TrumPutinGate

#23,702
#23,702
davethevol said:
And that still holds true. Wikileaks provided proof of illegal activities and has been disregarded by the media and the FBI.
Click to expand...

Tweet suggests though that he was upset the WikiLeaks material wasn't getting more traction, sorta like how you'd be upset if you planned and coordinated a big announcement and it wasn't well received.
 
#23,703
#23,703
Orange_Crush said:
Mine was no evade. It was pertinent to your question. Your question inferred that Trump/campaign went through foreign actors and knowingly interfaced with Russia while Hillary's campaign did not do so and unknowingly got info from Russia.

I'm questioning whether the former is true, and now I'll question if the latter is true, as by the time Hillary's campaign and Obama's justice department weaponized the dossier against Trump, they knew damn well the info came from Russia.
Click to expand...

Weaponized by Hillary's campaign and Obama’s justice department? One person's weaponiziation is another person's duty as an American, or literal job as an FBI director.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mick and luthervol
#23,705
#23,705
davethevol said:
Which is illegal how?
Click to expand...

Just a little bit of conspiracy.

Indictment: On or about October 4, 2016 ... STONE received an email from the high-ranking Trump Campaign official asking about the status of future releases by Organization 1. STONE answered that the head of Organization ... would release "a load every week going forward."
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mick and luthervol
#23,706
#23,706
I would like for the damaging information that Wiki Leaks had on Clinton to be released. I mean if we are going to indict a guy for knowing about the information and work with Russia in handling it. We at least should get to know the information.

Since we do know that the Clintons colluded with a foreign agent to falsify a docier in order to obtain a FISA warrant. Maybe that will be discovered at some point.
 
#23,707
#23,707
carlos86 said:
Just a little bit of conspiracy.

Indictment: On or about October 4, 2016 ... STONE received an email from the high-ranking Trump Campaign official asking about the status of future releases by Organization 1. STONE answered that the head of Organization ... would release "a load every week going forward."
Click to expand...


That is THE DEFINITION of collusion.
 
#23,708
#23,708
carlos86 said:
Just a little bit of conspiracy.

Indictment: On or about October 4, 2016 ... STONE received an email from the high-ranking Trump Campaign official asking about the status of future releases by Organization 1. STONE answered that the head of Organization ... would release "a load every week going forward."
Click to expand...
Conspiracy can be applied to anything because it’s such a broad charge. Are you in support of charging Hillary with conspiracy for hiring a firm to do opposition research on Trump and handing it over to Congress? Are you in favor of charging her with conspiracy and obstruction of justice for destroying her private servers and cell phones before the FBI could look at them?
 
#23,709
#23,709
Stew Cook said:
Weaponized by Hillary's campaign and Obama’s justice department? One person's weaponiziation is another person's duty as an American, or literal job as an FBI director.
Click to expand...

Funny that you didn't see the irony of that response.

And you didn't deny the fact that they all knew it was Russian sourced when leaked to the media to give the appearance of multiple sources of information when it was submitted to the FISA court to spy on Trump and smear him to the public?
 
  • Like
Reactions: NorthDallas40
#23,710
#23,710
Jxn Vol said:
I would like for the damaging information that Wiki Leaks had on Clinton to be released. I mean if we are going to indict a guy for knowing about the information and work with Russia in handling it. We at least should get to know the information.

Since we do know that the Clintons colluded with a foreign agent to falsify a docier in order to obtain a FISS warrant. Maybe that will be discovered at some point.
Click to expand...


No collusion!

Ok, collusion, but no fair you found out.
 
  • Like
Reactions: General Jack
#23,712
#23,712
Jxn Vol said:
I would like for the damaging information that Wiki Leaks had on Clinton to be released. I mean if we are going to indict a guy for knowing about the information and work with Russia in handling it. We at least should get to know the information.

Since we do know that the Clintons colluded with a foreign agent to falsify a docier in order to obtain a FISS warrant. Maybe that will be discovered at some point.
Click to expand...

Well, you would think so. iI's not like "Obama's guys" are heading up the Justice Department now.
 
#23,723
#23,723
Jxn Vol said:
I would like for the damaging information that Wiki Leaks had on Clinton to be released. I mean if we are going to indict a guy for knowing about the information and work with Russia in handling it. We at least should get to know the information.

Since we do know that the Clintons colluded with a foreign agent to falsify a docier in order to obtain a FISA warrant. Maybe that will be discovered at some point.
Click to expand...

Yall are dumber than Jared Kushner.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mick and Septic
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top