Not that it matters, but here is my 2 cents worth.
1. CPF ran a wide open attack, with Manning. Spread the field, and let athletes create space, and let Manning distribute. The ground game was good, but not always the identity. CPF used the tools afforded him. Manning was the focus, and sometimes he let the moment overtake him. He had all the tools anyone could ever want. But was never able to pull off a Natty. Not all his fault. His numbers against UF were video game numbers. But no w's.
2. CPF ran a more traditional UT style offense, with Tee Martin, that was more in Coach Fulmer's comfort zone. The O-line and the backs were the strengths, and the identity of this team. Although the receivers were pretty awesome. Tee's passing game took on a different look. It was more downfield, off of play-action. His ability to use his legs helped move the chains, score td's and win the time of possession battle. In turn, that allowed Chavis to unleash HELL on defense. Very similar to Bama, for the last decade. Classic UT football.
Tee was an excellent game manager, and very cooly allowed the game to come to him. Afterall, he had a huge cache of weapons to choose from, a great defense, and probably the best o-line in the country.
He could've done more. But he was a selfless team player, and a quiet leader. I honestly never saw him get flustered or overly upset.
