TrumPutinGate

#23,302
#23,302
McDad said:
Basically Bill Clinton with a bigger mouth and social media, then.
Click to expand...

If it weren't for the Clintons you guy would be setting around sucking on one thumb with the other one up your butts.

Move on, it's just not about them anymore.
 
#23,304
#23,304
Hunerwadel said:
If it weren't for the Clintons you guy would be setting around sucking on one thumb with the other one up your butts.

Move on, it's just not about them anymore.
Click to expand...
Lol. Ok.

Trump is LBJ with a bigger mouth and social media. Better?
 
#23,307
#23,307
lawgator1 said:
And so we come full circle. Right wing heads will explode if Cohen testifies that yes, Trump told him to say the Tower deal was kaput in February 2016, when it wasn't.
Click to expand...
Nah we’ll demand some form of actual evidence other than “Cohen said”

So when he actually says that without any evidence any if it’s actually refuted by evidence from say the SCO are you idiots gonna follow thru with another perjury charge or nah since he’s parroting your sides BS now?
 
#23,308
#23,308
NorthDallas40 said:
Nah we’ll demand some form of actual evidence other than “Cohen said”

So when he actually says that without any evidence any if it’s actually refuted by evidence from say the SCO are you idiots gonna follow thru with another perjury charge or nah since he’s parroting your sides BS now?
Click to expand...

At this rate, if Rudy says.. "Of course we coordinated with the Russians to hack the DNC, it's been in the news for a long time." Trump's base will not flinch.

Am I wrong?
 
#23,309
#23,309
Stew Cook said:
At this rate, if Rudy says.. "Of course we coordinated with the Russians to hack the DNC, it's been in the news for a long time." Trump's base will not flinch.

Am I wrong?
Click to expand...
I don’t know. You guys listen to Rudy more than I do. Do you think I take “Rudy says” as evidence?
 
#23,311
#23,311
Stew Cook said:
Honestly no, but I was curious if you had a notion.
Click to expand...
I don’t speak for the “base” and I’m sure there are ones who won’t believe any claim from the left... just like there are those on the far left that won’t accept anything from the right. Up to you if you want to dwell on those people only.

I used to claim being a moderate. I freely admit the two years of fiasco have pushed me farther right. And my answer to the continual “will you accept the SCO’s findings?” is also consistent I won’t accept the damn time of day from them since I view the appointment as unjust and unconstitutional.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NurseGoodVol
#23,312
#23,312
McDad said:
All 3 are at odds with your preferred system of governance. Unless i misunderstood and have made a mistake.
Click to expand...
Not at all. All 3 just have to exist within reasonable limits. There has always been and will always be a balance between the individual and society. We do not agree on where that balance lies, but that in no way means I do not value all three. That's sort of a silly accusation.
 
#23,314
#23,314
NorthDallas40 said:
I don’t speak for the “base” and I’m sure there are ones who won’t believe any claim from the left... just like there are those on the far left that won’t accept anything from the right. Up to you if you want to dwell on those people only.

I used to claim being a moderate. I freely admit the two years of fiasco have pushed me farther right. And my answer to the continual “will you accept the SCO’s findings?” is also consistent I won’t accept the damn time of day from them since I view the appointment as unjust and unconstitutional.
Click to expand...
Facts be damned....a true Trumper.
 
#23,315
#23,315
luthervol said:
Facts be damned....a true Trumper.
Click to expand...
If you’d idiots knock off “the end justifies the means” BS maybe you’d have some credibility. That’s another fact.

“We THINK this guy might have been speeding 20 miles back so we investigated his financial records to see how he could afford such a fast car and found many serious SEC fraud issues! Good thing we were on the job huh?”
 
  • Like
Reactions: Orange_Crush, 1972 Grad and ajvol01
#23,317
#23,317
NorthDallas40 said:
Nah we’ll demand some form of actual evidence other than “Cohen said”

So when he actually says that without any evidence any if it’s actually refuted by evidence from say the SCO are you idiots gonna follow thru with another perjury charge or nah since he’s parroting your sides BS now?
Click to expand...


If there's proof they spoke prior to the hearing in which Cohen lied, will you support impeachment?
 
#23,320
#23,320
luthervol said:
Not at all. All 3 just have to exist within reasonable limits. There has always been and will always be a balance between the individual and society. We do not agree on where that balance lies, but that in no way means I do not value all three. That's sort of a silly accusation.
Click to expand...
Marxism, or socialism, or communism is your preferred system?
 
#23,321
#23,321
lawgator1 said:
If there's proof they spoke prior to the hearing in which Cohen lied, will you support impeachment?
Click to expand...
Nope. I’ll bet they talked before the hearing. It’s the content of the discussion and you know it. The fact that they talked is indeed interesting and I’ve used that same argument on the TT meeting with the Russian lawyer and Simpson. But Cohen just talking to Trump? No it’s going to take more than that and you know it.
 
#23,323
#23,323
volfanhill said:
They haven’t been investigated? I thought Gowdy was going to take them down. Oh wait. I dislike the Clintons. They are scum. But they aren’t going to jail. At least they aren’t in the White House
Click to expand...
No they aren't. If i had their money and power I could get away with alot of sh!t too.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top