TrumPutinGate

#23,152
#23,152
NorthDallas40 said:
Nope. If Barr has basis to do so and thinks that’s the right answer he’s gonna win that argument. I absolutely believe the entire basis for this witch hunt, yes witch hunt, is fabricated. But it’s going now and Barr isn’t going to stop it nor do I believe he will ignore any factual findings.
Click to expand...

Cool
 
#23,155
#23,155
Why are people acting like this is some great vindication for Trump? We’re just in the same position we were in 3 days ago. And, doesn’t this indicate that Mueller is trying to be truthful and not part of some conspiracy to get Trump without evidence.
 
#23,157
#23,157
37L1 said:
You will come completely unglued if Muller ends up with nothing on Trump that will cause him to be removed from office.
Click to expand...
lol....he will not end up with nothing. However, I would be surprised and disappointed if he didn't come up with enough for all but the most insane redhatters to be forced to conclude he is a despicable person who should not be POTUS. I would then hang my hat on the fact that the continuation of a Trump presidency will only continue to weaken the right and strengthen the left. Trying to remain positive and an eternal optimist, I kind of view it as a win either way; even though I obviously and admittedly would prefer findings that lead to Trump's removal.

I still think he will resign.
 
#23,161
#23,161
tvolsfan said:
Why are people acting like this is some great vindication for Trump? We’re just in the same position we were in 3 days ago. And, doesn’t this indicate that Mueller is trying to be truthful and not part of some conspiracy to get Trump without evidence.
Click to expand...

It’s no vindication of Trump. The witch hunt for crimes goes on.

I just enjoy watching everyone put their faith in bogus reporting (yet again!!) and then watching the bubble pop.

It’s entertaining.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AirVol and 1972 Grad
#23,162
#23,162
luthervol said:
lol....he will not end up with nothing. However, I would be surprised and disappointed if he didn't come up with enough for all but the most insane redhatters to be forced to conclude he is a despicable person who should not be POTUS. I would then hang my hat on the fact that the continuation of a Trump presidency will only continue to weaken the right and strengthen the left. Trying to remain positive and an eternal optimist, I kind of view it as a win either way; even though I obviously and admittedly would prefer findings that lead to Trump's removal.

I still think he will resign.
Click to expand...
think = hope. Keep hope alive, luther. so far, that's all you've got.
 
#23,163
#23,163
luthervol said:
I thought it was a bullsht question.
Click to expand...
How you think is your problem, not ours.

You start schooling everyone else on the "probabilities" that supposedly drive everyone else's motives, and you expect not to be called on it? And you respond with your personal credulity as the standard of the probabilities we supposedly recognize and expect not to be called out as a bullsht answer?

The wonderful part was your inclusion of "rationality" as an ingredient in your fallacy of personal credulity.

You really do have delusions of grandeur, don't you?
 
  • Like
Reactions: AirVol, 37L1 and NorthDallas40
#23,164
#23,164
Orange_Crush said:
How you think is your problem, not ours.

You start schooling everyone else on the "probabilities" that supposedly drive everyone else's motives, and you expect not to be called on it? And you respond with your personal credulity as the standard of the probabilities we supposedly recognize and expect not to be called out as a bullsht answer?

The wonderful part was your inclusion of "rationality" as an ingredient in your fallacy of personal credulity.

You really do have delusions of grandeur, don't you?
Click to expand...
He’s used to dealing with adsolent brains wowed by his awesome intellect. Once he gets an adult giving him “holy cow you’re really full of **** aren’t you” it doesn’t fit his usual confirmation biased feedback he gets from his fawns.
 
#23,165
#23,165
NorthDallas40 said:
He’s used to dealing with adsolent brains wowed by his awesome intellect. Once he gets an adult giving him “holy cow you’re really full of **** aren’t you” it doesn’t fit his usual confirmation biased feedback he gets from his fawns.
Click to expand...
I'm not trying to be overly harsh, but if he's condescending everyone who disagrees with him as to what motivates us, and what probabilities we so obviously perceive, I think he owes us an explanation. And when it turns out to be himself, it's nothing more than self-gratifying, insulting bullsht. Though, he knew that when he posted the self-gratifying, insulting bullsht.
 
#23,166
#23,166
Orange_Crush said:
I'm not trying to be overly harsh, but if he's condescending everyone who disagrees with him as to what motivates us, and what probabilities we so obviously perceive, I think he owes us an explanation. And when it turns out to be himself, it's nothing more than self-gratifying, insulting bullsht. Though, he knew that when he posted the self-gratifying, insulting bullsht.
Click to expand...
Oh I’m being harsh on purpose and stand by my assertion of him. He claims to be in education so I’m gonna guess he runs his mouth there as much as he does here. And I’ll bet they fawn on his “obvious intellect” AKA bull ****.
 
#23,169
#23,169
Oh no... not ND and OC both. We always knew that as the investigation progressed watching the Trump apologists squirm would be entertaining, but we may have underestimated how much so.
 
#23,171
#23,171
Wow, reading back at the overreach on the bf story is funny. Then the sc statement on" factual inaccuracies". My cohorts at work were all a twitter that trump was finally going down. This is gonna be a major buzzkill for them.

Glad trumps trial in the press is going well. I'm still waiting for the indictment and the impeachment. Just solid evidence would be nice, instead of supposition, extrapolations, guesswork, unverifyable sources but then again that's what sells clicks.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NorthDallas40
#23,172
#23,172
luthervol said:
Oh no... not ND and OC both. We always knew that as the investigation progressed watching the Trump apologists squirm would be entertaining, but we may have underestimated how much so.
Click to expand...
Who's squirming? You just got rightfully called out with no response. I don't think you're in any position for a peacock strut. It looks more pea brained than what you think.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 37L1 and NorthDallas40
#23,174
#23,174
volinbham said:
Even though the statement was short it did say there were inaccuracies with claimed statements from Cohen to the SCO, inaccuracies with claims about documents and testimony given to the SCO.

That covers quite a bit. If it was just a minor inaccuracy about documentation (eg. have texts but not emails) or testimony (Cohen didn't use those exact words) I seriously doubt we'd have heard from Team Mueller. I think it's entirely reasonable to conclude that there are real problems with the story.

Even Dem analysts are backing off and concluding this one just wasn't the "ONE".
Click to expand...

BuzzFeed just reaffirmed it's reporting. Not saying they're right, but they're certainly not backing down.

 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top