TrumPutinGate

Thanks for that reminder, I'll repay in kind:
Just a gentle reminder to our democratic friends, they need to be skeptical of every new daily Comey/Mueller accusation that comes down the pike. You should realize by now that there is a really good chance that they are lying.
Now that we have all been adequately reminded of how to proceed, we can take a few minutes to reflect on where we were, where we are, and where that trajectory may likely lead.
 
ND has been a little more snarky and on edge than usual. I've decided he makes a pretty good barometer for measuring the uneasiness of the redhatters and the proximity of the incoming storm.

You've shown such a history of successful prediction, I'm sure your interpretations will garner the respect of the board. Good on you, luther.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NorthDallas40
Now that we have all been adequately reminded of how to proceed, we can take a few minutes to reflect on where we were, where we are, and where that trajectory may likely lead.

Where we are, where we are, and what that trajectory means?

lol

You sure you're not listing your moral references?
 
For a bit of honesty, Do I personally believe that Trump is complicit with coordinating denials on all things related to meetings/potential dealings with Russians..

I do
 
  • Like
Reactions: luthervol
How about you?
Nope. And I’ll stick with that until evidence otherwise.

The premise for your statement relies on an acceptance of the Trump campaign en masse coordinating with the Russians. I reject that statement based on two years of investigation with animus... thus your statement isn’t really a debatable item to me.
 
For a bit of honesty, Do I personally believe that Trump is complicit with coordinating denials on all things related to meetings/potential dealings with Russians..

I do
What would be shocking is for anyone not to feel that way. What has Trump ever done to warrant any presumption of honesty and integrity?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Stew Cook
It means that much like the "alleged" crafting of a story about adoptions, as the subject of the meeting about "adoptions". The bases were covered similarly with any dealings with Russia.
What about the coordination of the Russian attorney at the supposed meeting with the dossier idiots just before and immediately after the meeting? Just normal behavior? The whole Trump Tower storyline is complete BS
 
  • Like
Reactions: Orange_Vol1321
Nope. And I’ll stick with that until evidence otherwise.

The premise for your statement relies on an acceptance of the Trump campaign en masse coordinating with the Russians. I reject that statement based on two years of investigation with animus... thus your statement isn’t really a debatable item to me.

Well, you have been consistent with wanting more than circumstance.
 
Nope. And I’ll stick with that until evidence otherwise.

The premise for your statement relies on an acceptance of the Trump campaign en masse coordinating with the Russians. I reject that statement based on two years of investigation with animus... thus your statement isn’t really a debatable item to me.
Trump Tower Meeting. To think it was on the up and up about adoptions is, quite frankly, naive at best idiotic at worst.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tvolsfan
What about the coordination of the Russian attorney at the supposed meeting with the dossier idiots just before and immediately after the meeting? Just normal behavior? The whole Trump Tower storyline is complete BS
Trump Tower Meeting. To think it was on the up and up about adoptions is, quite frankly, naive at best idiotic at worst.
🤷‍♂️
 
Nope. And I’ll stick with that until evidence otherwise.

The premise for your statement relies on an acceptance of the Trump campaign en masse coordinating with the Russians. I reject that statement based on two years of investigation with animus... thus your statement isn’t really a debatable item to me.
Or stated another way, Yes, of course, but I'm grasping to that fraying thread of hope that there will be no conclusive evidence.
I like the "en masse" injection. Those little subtle, hardly noticeable movements of the defense.
 
Or stated another way, Yes, of course, but I'm grasping to that fraying thread of hope that there will be no conclusive evidence.
I like the "en masse" injection. Those little subtle, hardly noticeable movements of the defense.
Actually no my statement stands as I typed it. Your dumbazz twisting of it is all on you Clouseau
 
  • Like
Reactions: Orange_Vol1321
You know in order for you to believe the whole TT meeting was a setup, you would also have to believe that the russian lawyer was in on it.
There’s absolutely information showing she met with the dossier idiots immediately before and after the meet. 🤷‍♂️
 
There’s absolutely information showing she met with the dossier idiots immediately before and after the meet. 🤷‍♂️

So are you saying her and the "goldman?" promoter were working at the direction of the dossier people? And you find that so much easier to believe than the russians were working for Russia.
 
Advertisement

Back
Top