TrumPutinGate

#23,002
#23,002
Orange_Crush said:
Is Trump using Mueller's investigators as a source?

So, you and Mick's logic is that Mueller's denial supports the BF article? I'm not sure I understand what you're seeking to gain from this excluded middle fallacy.
Click to expand...

I was just stating some facts, make of it what you will.

If Mueller denies something, it's the gospel?
 
#23,005
#23,005
Stew Cook said:
I was just stating some facts, make of it what you will.

If Mueller denies something, it's the gospel?
Click to expand...

"Posting facts" like the heroin debate, where you posted facts that hardly any heroin is caught at the southern border, and almost 100% of heroin in the US comes from south and central america, so most heroin coming into the country is smuggled from somewhere besides our southern border?

You don't seem to be posting facts that help yourself.

His denial definitely undermines the article. I'm asking what logic you and Mick are seeking to establish. Are you trying to make the argument that Mueller's denial somehow helps support the article? Or that is Mueller doesn't deny every incorrect article, his denials mean nothing?

That seems to be the logic you two are trying to pass off here.
 
#23,006
#23,006
Orange_Crush said:
"Posting facts" like the heroin debate, where you posted facts that hardly any heroin is caught at the southern border, and almost 100% of heroin in the US comes from south and central america, so most heroin coming into the country is smuggled from somewhere besides our southern border?

You don't seem to be posting facts that help yourself.

His denial definitely undermines the article. I'm asking what logic you and Mick are seeking to establish. Are you trying to make the argument that Mueller's denial somehow helps support the article? Or that is Mueller doesn't deny every incorrect article, his denials mean nothing?

That seems to be the logic you two are trying to pass off here.
Click to expand...

You thinking that I was trying to pass off logic, in this instance, is what I find amusing.
 
#23,008
#23,008
DC_Vol said:
Not mutually exclusive. In fact, one could be the direct result of the other.
Click to expand...
So I think you’re referring to the SCO statement on the buzzfeed false narrative. Yes those are related. The post you’re quoting is refuting his implication that thus the lack of an SCO rebuttal of all the other claims mist mean they are true.
 
#23,011
#23,011
NorthDallas40 said:
So I think you’re referring to the SCO statement on the buzzfeed false narrative. Yes those are related. The post you’re quoting is refuting his implication that thus the lack of an SCO rebuttal of all the other claims mist mean they are true.
Click to expand...

Updated the portion of the post I was responding to. I can see how it may not have been clear.
 
#23,013
#23,013
NorthDallas40 said:
So I think you’re referring to the SCO statement on the buzzfeed false narrative. Yes those are related. The post you’re quoting is refuting his implication that thus the lack of an SCO rebuttal of all the other claims mist mean they are true.
Click to expand...
That comment really got to you didn't it? "Makes sense".
 
#23,016
#23,016
ajvol01 said:
I'm not talking about the Buzzfeed story from yesterday.

Just a gentle reminder to our liberal friends they need to be a tad more patient/skeptical with every new daily Trump bombshell that comes down the pike.
Click to expand...
Thanks for that reminder, I'll repay in kind:
Just a gentle reminder to our republican friends, they need to be just a tad more skeptical of every new daily Trump/Giuliani denial that comes down the pike. You should realize by now that there is a really good chance that they are lying.
 
#23,019
#23,019
luthervol said:
Thanks for that reminder, I'll repay in kind:
Just a gentle reminder to our republican friends, they need to be just a tad more skeptical of every new daily Trump/Giuliani denial that comes down the pike. You should realize by now that there is a really good chance that they are lying.
Click to expand...
Thanks for that reminder, I'll repay in kind:
Just a gentle reminder to our democratic friends, they need to be skeptical of every new daily Comey/Mueller accusation that comes down the pike. You should realize by now that there is a really good chance that they are lying.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 37L1 and NorthDallas40
#23,021
#23,021
0nelilreb said:
The back read in this thread is hillarious. Have you guys actually thought about what you are doing ? You are defending BUZZFEED. The desire for anything AntiTrump has brought you to a place of having to defend a Buzzfeed article . 😂
Click to expand...
Nbc gave them 200M the last two years. NBC money is Soros money.

National Enquirer is more credible. Atleast they will tell you we're a gossip magazine.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ajvol01 and DC_Vol
#23,022
#23,022
0nelilreb said:
The back read in this thread is hillarious. Have you guys actually thought about what you are doing ? You are defending BUZZFEED. The desire for anything AntiTrump has brought you to a place of having to defend a Buzzfeed article . 😂
Click to expand...

I'm not sure if anyone really is, at this point.. I qualified my speculating with "alleged"

I've not been serious in anything I've said in this thread over the last hour or so.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top