Sark

#128
#128
volfannbama said:
You dont know much about investigations do you?
Also, a subpoena is not required to question someone.
Click to expand...
To call them to TESTIFY? As far as the rest, his name came up as a possible corroborating witness to a witness who was testifying as to what he personally witnessed. When you have hundreds of witnesses do you call every POTENTIAL witness to verify the account of whomever brought their name up? Or is that just in back**** Bama? 😉
 
  • Like
Reactions: BeecherVol
#130
#130
butchna said:
To call them to TESTIFY? As far as the rest, his name came up as a possible corroborating witness to a witness who was testifying as to what he personally witnessed. When you have hundreds of witnesses do you call every POTENTIAL witness to verify the account of whomever brought their name up? Or is that just in back**** Bama? 😉
Click to expand...
They didnt even question him. That has nothing to do with testifying. Cops never questioned him. Not even to see if he was an eye witness etc. His name was thrown out 3rd hand. So yes, when you are doing a major investigation you question every single potential witness. You also put them on the subpoena list to testify, whether you need them or not.
Prettt apparent that you dont know alot about investigations.
 
  • Like
Reactions: illvol
#131
#131
volfannbama said:
Again you dont know much about major investigations do you? A potential eye witness is a minnow? Lol
Click to expand...

Sandusky was toast and everybody around there knew what was coming if it ever got investigated. Thats why it wasnt hard to get him convicted. Then it became about who knew what and who else was going down with him.

Major investigations hammer to the top brass not small turds like him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: VolNExile and butchna
#132
#132
volfannbama said:
They didnt even question him. That has nothing to do with testifying. Cops never questioned him. Not even to see if he was an eye witness etc. His name was thrown out 3rd hand. So yes, when you are doing a major investigation you question every single potential witness. You also put them on the subpoena list to testify, whether you need them or not.
Prettt apparent that you dont know alot about investigations.
Click to expand...
Prettt? I think you talkin out your cop azz on this one. Don’t know why you felt the need to argue with me but you’re you. So they have a subpoena list of people they don’t intend to subpoena?
 
#133
#133
BeecherVol said:
Sandusky was toast and everybody around there knew what was coming if it ever got investigated. Thats why it wasnt hard to get him convicted. Then it became about who knew what and who else was going down with him.

Major investigations hammer to the top brass not small turds like him.
Click to expand...
Major investigation question all potential eye witnesses. To say otherwise is simply stupid.
 
#134
#134
butchna said:
Prettt? I think you talkin out your cop azz on this one. Don’t know why you felt the need to argue with me but you’re you. So they have a subpoena list of people they don’t intend to subpoena?
Click to expand...
My original statement was that they never even questioned him. That has zero to do with a subpoena.
 
#137
#137
volfannbama said:
Major investigation question all potential eye witnesses. To say otherwise is simply stupid.
Click to expand...

That's simply not true in every case and wasnt even remotely required in this case to get a conviction.

I know this from personal experience and having 2 family members for lawyers and good friend that is a LEO detective.
 
  • Like
Reactions: butchna
#138
#138
BeecherVol said:
That's simply not true in every case and wasnt even remotely required in this case to get a conviction.

I know this from personal experience and having 2 family members for lawyers and good friend that is a LEO detective.
Click to expand...
But they’re not Bama cops so GTFO. 😉
 
#141
#141
I have it on good authority from a highly unnamed and pseudo-confidential source that Lee Corso and Bill Callahan will soon be named dual OCs for our beloved Vols. The only snag in negotiations is that Corso wants to be able to continue his mascot-head routine for Gameday but Callahan thinks it will make them look bad.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FLVOL_79
#142
#142
BeecherVol said:
That's simply not true in every case and wasnt even remotely required in this case to get a conviction.

I know this from personal experience and having 2 family members for lawyers and good friend that is a LEO detective.
Click to expand...
So you have family and friends that work in leo and they told you that they wouldnt question a potential eye witness? Lol, yeah ok
 
  • Like
Reactions: illvol and MustafaRasta
#147
#147
BeecherVol said:
What's been your opinion of Pruiit and the OC hire?

Or should I just scan through a few threads.
Click to expand...
I dont have an opinion of Pruitt and the oc hire. I have no faith in the ut admin as a hire to handle the hire in a competent manner, because they have a history of not handling hires in a competent manner. So until they do, they dont.
Im also convinced they are not interested in building a winning program. So it has little to do with Pruitt.
 
#149
#149
volfannbama said:
I dont have an opinion of Pruitt and the oc hire. I have no faith in the ut admin as a hire to handle the hire in a competent manner, because they have a history of not handling hires in a competent manner. So until they do, they dont.
Im also convinced they are not interested in building a winning program. So it has little to do with Pruitt.
Click to expand...

So all of your comments in the various OC threads over the last few weeks have no opinion of Pruitt attached and are strictly about the UT admin?
 
  • Like
Reactions: VolNExile, butchna and Behr
#150
#150
I would say unbelievable, but its not anymore. I just smh and laugh.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement





Back
Top