Amateur Hour Continues

  • Like
Reactions: Obsessed
  • Like
Reactions: tennvols77
Stacking the deck to insure the primary winner and stealing the election achieve the same eventuality. Trump. Thanks Dems.

Nothing was insured.

It's like Kentucky in basketball. Does it get calls in games that other teams don't get? Sure. Does that favoritism guarantee that it will go undefeated in the SEC? To the extent that there's no point in even watching games because of said officiating?

Nope.

Usually it wins simply because it's the better team, not because of the officiating. And sometimes they straight up get beat.
 
Nothing was insured.

It's like Kentucky in basketball. Does it get calls in games that other teams don't get? Sure. Does that favoritism guarantee that it will go undefeated in the SEC? To the extent that there's no point in even watching games because of said officiating?

Nope.

Usually it wins simply because it's the better team, not because of the officiating. And sometimes they straight up get beat.
I'll be damned, you really do actually watch sports.

 
There is peer reviewed papers with the “science” to back it up.

I find it awfully ignorant to think all children are the same and some meds cant cause adverse effects.
Vaccinations should be up to the parents.

"It all traces back to a study published in 1998 that falsely linked the MMR vaccine and autism.7 Even though the study has since been retracted and declared “utterly false” by the editor of the journal that published it,8 the damage was done and the myth persists.9 This is evident in the rising rates of vaccine refusals and how the idea has seeped into the public consciousness."


How to Tell Your Anti-Vaccine Patients the Truth About Vaccines
 
Is this real?

DuRM_A2UcAExYq9.jpg
 
There is peer reviewed papers with the “science” to back it up.

I find it awfully ignorant to think all children are the same and some meds cant cause adverse effects.
Vaccinations should be up to the parents.

Wakefield’s article linking MMR vaccine and autism was fraudulent
Clear evidence of falsification of data should now close the door on this damaging vaccine scare
“Science is at once the most questioning and . . . skeptical of activities and also the most trusting,” said Arnold Relman, former editor of the New England Journal of Medicine, in 1989. “It is intensely skeptical about the possibility of error, but totally trusting about the possibility of fraud.”1 Never has this been truer than of the 1998 Lancet paper that implied a link between the measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine and a “new syndrome” of autism and bowel disease.

Wakefield’s article linking MMR vaccine and autism was fraudulent | The BMJ
 
Advertisement





Back
Top