Why would anybody want to be the OC here

#128
#128
Johnnyreb#VFL said:
We need to hire someone and tell him your only goal this season is to beat Vandy, similar to how we did with Shoop and Florida
Click to expand...
Neyland was hired to beat Vandy and he did, which turned out pretty good for the VOLs for a number of years. It will likely work againt if we add Alabama, Florida, and Georgia to the list. A new day is dawning with Tennessee football.
 
#129
#129
Why so negative? Chandler is a really talented back. Also, JG at his “absolute best” was national player of the week. The line is bad and the defense is still developing, but our situation is not near as bad as you see it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: k-town_king
#130
#130
Why would anybody want to be OC at Tennessee?

Because there's no place like Neyland when it's rocking!
587461690-university-of-tennessee-wallpaper-desktop.jpg

AgonizingSpanishEeve-max-1mb.gif
 
#131
#131
HonestVol24 said:
I’ve been trying to keep up with the OC search as much as possible. As a career move, what’s the pros of taking this job? God awful line. Slow over rated receivers who are bad route runners and can’t do much besides a quick slant or throw it up fade routes and hope for the best. No depth at any position. Best running back gets hurt often and wouldn’t see the field at bama or Georgia. Qb is mediocre at his absolute best. Can’t read a defense, see a blitz coming, ball always comes out late but tough as nails. Knowing the line is bad and freshman can’t win upfront in the sec means the offense will be bad next year no matter who the coach is. Why would a coach come to a school with no weapons to play with, no line, no qb (unless jt is secretly great). No matter the coach we hire or the recruits we bring in we’re going to be bad on offense next year and our crazy fans will want to run the OC out of town like we did to Helton this year before he got hired away. It’s a no win situation with everything to lose. Seems like a bad career move to me. Whoever we get will have nothing to play with next year and our fan base who doesn’t understand sec football and stability will be ready to fire whoever it is after the first game. Im in no way saying Helton was a good OC or bad because he never had any talent to play with and you’re pretty limited in what you can do when your gun has no bullets.
Click to expand...
Simply to come here and make you eat your words. Great coaches turn chicken $#!T into chicken salad with average players. Plus you seem to think that a great OC won’t lure great players itching to get on the field early.
 
#134
#134
larjoranj said:
Well, it's partly real. Yes, that dude was taking an ice bath in Norway. I swapped his head out for Freeze's and I added the girl with the UT hat. So it's a doctored real pic :cool:
Click to expand...

He has several videos on YouTube where he is iceskating, cuts a hole in theice with a chainsaw and takes a swim.



This is the guy in the picture you are referring to.
 
#135
#135
HonestVol24 said:
You missed my point. I’ll try to be more simple for you. How do you recruit and develop when you get ran off after one year of having a bad offense because you are coaching someone else’s players that aren’t any good? Did you not watch what our fans acted like pertaining to Helton? We basically ran him off because he couldn’t shoot a gun that had no bullets. That’s my point. Next year will be the same regardless, not to mention everybody wants freeze so whoever we hire will be scrutinized from the jump.
Click to expand...

You're already making it simple by rehashing the context of 20 other threads identical to this one. We are all aware of the suckage, but what's the point of bringing it up over and over like you are enlightening everyone with some new found information. Volman360's alter ego?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sara Clark, Orangeredblooded, 82_VOL_83 and 1 other person
#136
#136
UT_Dutchman said:
You're already making it simple by rehashing the context of 20 other threads identical to this one. We are all aware of the suckage, but what's the point of bringing it up over and over like you are enlightening everyone with some new found information. Volman360's alter ego?
Click to expand...
Honesty....bringing it to you from VN for 79 posts and 4 months.






Dear 8lb 6oz baby Jesus, put a 1000 post limit on starting threads.
 
#140
#140
HonestVol24 said:
Why did our “stud receivers” have terrible numbers, not make the all sec first or second team, and not on any draft boards. Because Calloway and Jennings are slow af. Anybody with eyes can see that. But you’re probably one of the fans that called slow ass tkj a stud too 🙄
Click to expand...

Terrible numbers? Hell, we barely passed. Total yards isn't the focus, it is efficiency. They caught and did their part. That's all they can do when we run so much.

Speed aint everything (ask malone). They'll be NFL players in 2 years, so there's that.
 
#142
#142
It is threads such as this one that make me wish there were limitations on who can start one.
 
#143
#143
HonestVol24 said:
I’ve been trying to keep up with the OC search as much as possible. As a career move, what’s the pros of taking this job? God awful line. Slow over rated receivers who are bad route runners and can’t do much besides a quick slant or throw it up fade routes and hope for the best. No depth at any position. Best running back gets hurt often and wouldn’t see the field at bama or Georgia. Qb is mediocre at his absolute best. Can’t read a defense, see a blitz coming, ball always comes out late but tough as nails. Knowing the line is bad and freshman can’t win upfront in the sec means the offense will be bad next year no matter who the coach is. Why would a coach come to a school with no weapons to play with, no line, no qb (unless jt is secretly great). No matter the coach we hire or the recruits we bring in we’re going to be bad on offense next year and our crazy fans will want to run the OC out of town like we did to Helton this year before he got hired away. It’s a no win situation with everything to lose. Seems like a bad career move to me. Whoever we get will have nothing to play with next year and our fan base who doesn’t understand sec football and stability will be ready to fire whoever it is after the first game. Im in no way saying Helton was a good OC or bad because he never had any talent to play with and you’re pretty limited in what you can do when your gun has no bullets.
Click to expand...

What happened to all of those chest-thumping recruiting rankings? Same guys, right?
 
#145
#145
vfl_gbo said:
Why is that exactly? Why do you hate America and freedom of speech?
Click to expand...
If people are going to start a thread, they do so realizing people are going to give opinions. No one said you had to like my opinion or agree with it. I still think the thread sucks, JMO!

**edit** Because we live in America, I get to voice my opinion freely! :)
 
#146
#146
greazy1722 said:
Great Post I literally said the same thing the other what Top flight or up and coming OC wants to come here..
Click to expand...

It's a dumb question though.

It's very lucrative position for one.

Helton left because her got promoted. Not because it was a "bad gig".

This is a useless thread.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sara Clark
#147
#147
Sara Clark said:
If people are going to start a thread, they do so realizing people are going to give opinions. No one said you had to like my opinion or agree with it. I still think the thread sucks, JMO!

**edit** Because we live in America, I get to voice my opinion freely! :)
Click to expand...

But apparently the original poster does not. In your own words, I wish there were limitations on people who could start threads. So the only threads that can be started or ones you agree with?

The guy voiced his opinion and you went out of your way to making negative comment. That's more of a commentary on you.
 
#148
#148
vfl_gbo said:
But apparently the original poster does not. In your own words, I wish there were limitations on people who could start threads. So the only threads that can be started or ones you agree with?

The guy voiced his opinion and you went out of your way to making negative comment. That's more of a commentary on you.
Click to expand...
No, it has nothing to do with starting a thread "I don't agree with." You are making ignorant assumptions and turning this in to a "weirdo" conversation.
 
#150
#150
Sara Clark said:
No, it has nothing to do with starting a thread "I don't agree with." You are making ignorant assumptions and turning this in to a "weirdo" conversation.
Click to expand...

It is threads such as this one that make me wish there were limitations on who can start one.

This is what you said...... But somehow I'm ignorant and didn't understand what you met? Okaaaaaay. Nice..
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement



Back
Top