butchna
Sit down and tell me all about it...way over there
- Joined
- Jan 6, 2013
- Messages
- 106,953
- Likes
- 224,824
Um, bigger budget, better facilities, better tradition, ability to recruit better players, ability to win championships with those players. It isn’t close. Just because we suck right now does not mean that it is a comparable job.
Pruitt had to sweeten the pot to pry him away from his brother. That would get sour if he put a poison pill in fine print. I believe it was assumed that Helton would flourish this season and would eventually be in demand for his own show...2-3 years time. The flourishing part didn’t exactly happen, but he’s on a list. Pruitt made $1.3 mil at Bama and didn’t pay a crimson cent to jump to another SEC school...as a HC. If he had tried to bounce to be a DC, he would have had to pony up. So you believe he’d have the stones to ask differently of his first hire? It’s wise not to look for examples...they don’t exist...for a reason.
It seems more like like dudes can't, or won't learn to me.This. I know the talent hasn’t been there, but there really seemed to be zero improvement at that spot. On the momentum-crushing sack following Vandy’s missed field goal and the Jordan 19 yard run, Tatum got beat inside badly but looked at the left guard like he was supposed to have help. If that’s what really happened and we’re still having those kind of miscommunications in game 12, that’s not just inferior talent getting run over, that seems like poor position coaching.
Check the budgets. Not close. They can’t recruit as well as us. Even tho we suck right now, we will finish well ahead of them in recruiting.This isn't the 90s anymore. Most every SEC school has excellent facilities, a giant budget, etc. Tennessee might be a slightly better job, but at the current state of the program, it is more likely to tarnish your resume than boost it. You have to come and work miracles to do well.
Why? Because our team sucks? Is MSU a better job then? How about Purdue? That SC team has gone down to the wire with us this year and last during two of our worst years ever, and it’s the better job? By no measure is it the better job.Right now, at this moment. SC is the better job for an OC. Sorry.
You tell me why it isn’t true. Compare the budgets for example. Compare the history. Compare the ability to recruit talent. There is no measure where SC is a comparable job to TN
Why? Because our team sucks? Is MSU a better job then? How about Purdue? That SC team has gone down to the wire with us this year and last during two of our worst years ever, and it’s the better job? By no measure is it the better job.
Why? Because our team sucks? Is MSU a better job then? How about Purdue? That SC team has gone down to the wire with us this year and last during two of our worst years ever, and it’s the better job? By no measure is it the better job.
Ryan Hilinski - Football Recruiting - Player Profiles - ESPNCheck the budgets. Not close. They can’t recruit as well as us. Even tho we suck right now, we will finish well ahead of them in recruiting.
Just because our team sucks doesn’t mean it’s not a better job. MSU is better than us to. That a better job than TN? This is a dumb argument
About the same honestly, but they have a better OL. Hence why they barely beat us. Again. That doesn’t mean it’s the better job anyway. Players change. Next year we could have Hurts in here at QB and well add Keyton and a host of other playmakers that SC couldn’t dream of landing. Then who would you rather OC for. Just because they are slightly better than us now doesn’t make them the better job. That’s like saying that when Texas was struggling that any team who was playing better than them is a better job. It’s not. TN and Texas offer things that lowly schools like SC could never offerWould you rather call plays for our personnel right now or SC's?
Except by all accounts, Pruitt has told people he was pleased with the offense Helton was calling. Doesn't exactly scream "deflection" to me.
It would have been reported and it wasn’t. Because there was no buyout. So you’re a saying a “proven commodity” is less likely to get locked in financially than an unproven variety? FACT is that there are no examples of an assistant paying out they azz to advance their careers. Don’t know don’t care what the language is in their contracts...it becomes irrelevant during nut cutting time.Again, if you don’t know this to be true about Helton’s contract, then please stop asserting it as fact. It just confuses things. If you do know for a fact what Helton’s contract says, then please confirm that.
Pruitt, like Aranda, was one of the most proven commodities in football when he signed his Alabama contract, which is a different situation than Helton was in (not that the situations need to be different for the contract terms to be different). Are you even sure that Pruitt didn’t have a buyout, or are you just assuming there too?