Bassmaster_Vol
June=#LifeMonth
- Joined
- Jun 14, 2016
- Messages
- 54,656
- Likes
- 230,936
Those 538 numbers on the House don't look good for the DNC.
Or maybe polling methodology needs to be changed. Look at Rasmussen. They were second best in the Presidential polling, after they changed their model, and look like they will be very accurate tonight. I have posted the story before about how they changed their model.
For reference, in 2010 the GOP gained 63 seats in the House to gain control and gained 6 seats in the Senate (still minority party). In 2014, the GOP gained an additional 13 seats in the House for their largest majority in 100 years and 9 seats in the Senate to take control.
Dems looking at about 25 in the House which would put them at 220 - 215 and losing 2 or 3 in the Senate. That is not a wave in any form or fashion.
Dems only need to get to 218 for a majority in the House though.For reference, in 2010 the GOP gained 63 seats in the House to gain control and gained 6 seats in the Senate (still minority party). In 2014, the GOP gained an additional 13 seats in the House for their largest majority in 100 years and 9 seats in the Senate to take control.
Dems looking at about 25 in the House which would put them at 220 - 215 and losing 2 or 3 in the Senate. That is not a wave in any form or fashion.
They are polling the wrong people sounds like to me lelNo, the regular polls were very close to correct on popular vote, but again, there is some undercurrent going on of people who are saying they are voting one way, or are undecided, and it's just not true. That plus the polling targeting is off and is missing that group that are locked in for Trump/always red.
Yes the national polls got it close to correct. But that’s not how our system works. So again they should probably relook at that for presidential elections. Furthermore Rasmussen has gotten polling very accurate compared to their peers. I know you don’t like them but get over it. They have fundamentally changed how they do it.No, the regular polls were very close to correct on popular vote, but again, there is some undercurrent going on of people who are saying they are voting one way, or are undecided, and it's just not true. That plus the polling targeting is off and is missing that group that are locked in for Trump/always red.