Bombs found at Clinton and Soros Homes

And those are the things that kept Obama from getting elected as president right? Oops.

No, I was just providing examples of the type of disinformation I was talking about.

You sure are worked up about that post I made a couple of hours ago. It was not intended to be as serious as you took it. Next time I will ask the question of you before calling you out with an assumption. My apologies. I cannot have your heart attack on my conscience. ;)
 
But but but they love freedom of speech. And they support that constitutional right. And they're happy to let their ideas compete in the marketplace against the opposing sides ideas. At least that's what ive been told.

They love and defend freedom of speech as long as the speech agrees with them.
 
**** Obama? You must be new around these parts.

If a famous actor had said that at an awards show while Obama was President they would have immediately been labelled a racist and lost work. No one would have accepted it as a statement against his politics. It wouldn't even be considered. CNN would have instantly ran a story about how racism sparked the outburst.

That's the world Democrats are creating. Disagree with a black Democrat, you must be racist. Disagree with a female Democrat, you must be sexist. These are the types of narratives being pushed by MSM. Seriously, so much of what I see and read promotes this idea that if you are not a Democrat, you must be a racist, sexist, hatemongering homophobe, and if you dare speak out against a Dem for any reason, you will be hit with these labels. And I'm not saying the GOP doesn't try to play the name game as well, but they are so far behind in this particular strategy it equates to them calling people "doo-doo-heads". Comes across as extremely pathetic.

As long as this tactic continues to be employed, how can we ever expect civil discourse?
 
But but but they love freedom of speech. And they support that constitutional right. And they're happy to let their ideas compete in the marketplace against the opposing sides ideas. At least that's what ive been told.

Again, I have no qualms about the competition between ideas. I don't like the idea that outsiders are trying to influence our elections by peddling disinformation on a fairly large scale.
 
If a famous actor had said that at an awards show while Obama was President they would have immediately been labelled a racist and lost work. No one would have accepted it as a statement against his politics. It wouldn't even be considered. CNN would have instantly ran a story about how racism sparked the outburst.

That's the world Democrats are creating. Disagree with a black Democrat, you must be racist. Disagree with a female Democrat, you must be sexist. These are the types of narratives being pushed by MSM. Seriously, so much of what I see and read promotes this idea that if you are not a Democrat, you must be a racist, sexist, hatemongering homophobe, and if you dare speak out against a Dem for any reason, you will be hit with these labels. And I'm not saying the GOP doesn't try to play the name game as well, but they are so far behind in this particular strategy it equates to them calling people "doo-doo-heads". Comes across as extremely pathetic.

As long as this tactic continues to be employed, how can we ever expect civil discourse?

Damn, I think that happened and now he is president.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MercyPercy
No, I was just providing examples of the type of disinformation I was talking about.

You sure are worked up about that post I made a couple of hours ago. It was not intended to be as serious as you took it. Next time I will ask the question of you before calling you out with an assumption. My apologies. I cannot have your heart attack on my conscience. ;)
No need to apologize. Im not worked up. I was just trying to make you feel bad for going all Septic up in here.

Maybe if you had seen the ads and the pop culture hog and I have through the years, this meme business and its influence on the election would be as ridiculous to you as it is to us.
 
No need to apologize. Im not worked up. I was just trying to make you feel bad for going all Septic up in here.

Maybe if you had seen the ads and the pop culture hog and I have through the years, this meme business and its influence on the election would be as ridiculous to you as it is to us.

But I have seen too many people believe this garbage.
 
Again, I have no qualms about the competition between ideas. I don't like the idea that outsiders are trying to influence our elections by peddling disinformation on a fairly large scale.
The disinformation has always been present. Does it really matter if it comes from inside or outside of our system?
 
CNN anchor Chris Cuomo shared a touching moment with colleague Don Lemon after the cable news network's New York office was sent a pipe bomb

5397224-6315439-image-a-1_1540460334603.jpg
 
And those are the things that kept Obama from getting elected as president right? Oops.

People didn't vote for him because of one or more of those things, this belief is anecdotal, but if we're being honest - we know... 100% chance people on this very forum still believe one or more of those things.

I think the difference here is that you have a much higher threshold of where you believe the average trump supporters rational thought lies. You may not be influenced by Beelzebub arm wrestling a Jewish carpenter with a caption touting trumps honesty as a thing to marvel - but complete idiots are.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: MercyPercy
You know something we don't?

No. But if the bomber is really a pro Trump dude, I would think that Peter Fonda would have been target number one.

Remember this?

Actor Peter Fonda delivered a profane Twitter rant against President Trump’s immigration policies Wednesday morning, saying the president’s 12-year-old son Barron should be taken from his mother and placed in a “cage with pedophiles.”

Mr. Fonda, the younger brother of actress and liberal activist Jane Fonda, was responding to Tuesday’s joint White House press briefing with Sarah Huckabee Sanders and Homeland Security Secretary Kristjen Nielsen. In a now-deleted tweet, the “Easy Rider” star said Ms. Nielson should be put in a cage naked and “whipped by passersby while being filmed.”

In subsequent tweets that have also since been deleted, Mr. Fonda said Ms. Sanders’ children should be taken away and the president’s youngest son should be stripped from first lady Melania Trump and put in a cage with pedophiles.
 
No. But if the bomber is really a pro Trump dude, I would think that Peter Fonda would have been target number one.

Remember this?

Actor Peter Fonda delivered a profane Twitter rant against President Trump’s immigration policies Wednesday morning, saying the president’s 12-year-old son Barron should be taken from his mother and placed in a “cage with pedophiles.”

Mr. Fonda, the younger brother of actress and liberal activist Jane Fonda, was responding to Tuesday’s joint White House press briefing with Sarah Huckabee Sanders and Homeland Security Secretary Kristjen Nielsen. In a now-deleted tweet, the “Easy Rider” star said Ms. Nielson should be put in a cage naked and “whipped by passersby while being filmed.”

In subsequent tweets that have also since been deleted, Mr. Fonda said Ms. Sanders’ children should be taken away and the president’s youngest son should be stripped from first lady Melania Trump and put in a cage with pedophiles.

Jeezus Rain man. No one remembers that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MercyPercy
Any guesses on who will be the next recipient of a fake bomb?

First, from what I read, these are not "fake." Just crude and not likely to work. But they do contain explosives and shrapnel.

Second, please, by all means, join in the Fox/Trump echo chamber of its no big deal because they didn't go off. I think the lack of merit of your thinking is best displayed when you make dumbazz comments like that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mick
Again, I have no qualms about the competition between ideas. I don't like the idea that outsiders are trying to influence our elections by peddling disinformation on a fairly large scale.
a 400,000 vs 6,500,000,000 fairly large scale? or .0006% scale? https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...a-doozy/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.7b2c32e39cb9
or maybe a 400,000 vs 218,930,000,000 scale? .0001% U.S. advertising spending 2015-2021 | Statista

on what metric were the Russians a fairly large scale vs US advertising?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Obsessed and McDad
People didn't vote for him because of one or more of those things, this belief is anecdotal, but if we're being honest - we know... 100% chance people on this very forum still believe one or more of those things.

I think the difference here is that you have a much higher threshold of where you believe the average trump supporters rational thought lies. You may not be influenced by Beelzebub arm wrestling a Jewish carpenter with a caption touting trumps honesty as a thing to marvel - but complete idiots are.

Are there complete idiots on both sides of thepolitical spectrum?
 
Advertisement

Back
Top