lawgator1
Senior Member
- Joined
- Aug 8, 2005
- Messages
- 74,886
- Likes
- 44,271
There's a lot of difference between calling people out for encouraging classless behavior and acknowledging crazy.Shall I recount to you the hundreds of posts in this forum over the last week -- or the many thread titles -- which attribute political threats and violence to Democrats, as a political party?
There's a lot of difference between encouraging classless behavior and somebody mailing pipe bombs.
ReminderA good argument can be made that the former is in large part a result of the latter.
Again, need I quote all of the GOPers who attacked HRC or any other Dem for suggesting confrontation with GOPers, and saying they were to blame for anything that got out of hand?
Sorry, but this is out of hand. And at least on the face of it sure seems like a result of a political agenda.
That's a classic logical fallacy. Post hoc ergo propter hoc.A good argument can be made that the former is in large part a result of the latter.
Again, need I quote all of the GOPers who attacked HRC or any other Dem for suggesting confrontation with GOPers, and saying they were to blame for anything that got out of hand?
Sorry, but this is out of hand. And at least on the face of it sure seems like a result of a political agenda.
Exactly! I am willing to accept that he was being sincere earlier when he condemned this and spoke in favor of unity. Now, that goes out the window if he takes to the stage tonight and goes on a tangent about the fake news media, doesn't cut off the "CNN Sucks!" chants and says things such as "Knock the crap out of 'em will ya! I will pay your legal bills!"I disagree. He can turn a corner here, if he wants to. If it is sincere and not read off the teleprompter, and if he sticks to it, it can both work and be a credit to him.
We will find out.
I Soros wasn’t. I thought some were. Maybe not. Regardless, anyone finding these packages I’m sure would prefer they don’t blow up.The Soros thing they said was likely hand delivered. If the same group is doing all of these, presumably none were mailed. Even if not, the timing is awfully suspicious if its independent actors, which I doubt.
I don't agree with that, but if I did you have to blame the other side as well to remain logically consistent. You have to say that it was Bernie Sanders' fault (or something similar like he "created the environment for") that guy shot Steve Scalise.A good argument can be made that the former is in large part a result of the latter.
Again, need I quote all of the GOPers who attacked HRC or any other Dem for suggesting confrontation with GOPers, and saying they were to blame for anything that got out of hand?
Sorry, but this is out of hand. And at least on the face of it sure seems like a result of a political agenda.
I don't know what you're talking about. I haven't made any comments on the manner in which they were built. All I read is that authorities stated they "appear" to be pipe bombs. Does that mean they only have the appearance of one, or that they are actually functioning pipe bombs?Why does it matter that there are better ways to build one?
The point is, someone, or someones, built and delivered them at all.
I don't agree with that, but if I did you have to blame the other side as well to remain logically consistent. You have to say that it was Bernie Sanders' fault (or something similar like he "created the environment for") that guy shot Steve Scalise.
I don't know what you're talking about. I haven't made any comments on the manner in which they were built.
All I read is that authorities stated they "appear" to be pipe bombs. Does that mean they only have the appearance of one, or that they are actually functioning pipe bombs?
There's a big difference between Donald saying people should be "thrown out" of his rallies or Maxine calling for conservatives to be "confronted" in public and shooting a representative on a baseball field or mailing a pipe bomb to a politician.Both sides should cut out the rhetoric which even remotely suggests violence as a means to solve our differences. Blaming one or the other doesn't work well because "the other" can always point back to the reverse situation.