SweetasSoda
Captain of the Cheerleaders
- Joined
- Jul 28, 2018
- Messages
- 22,989
- Likes
- 141,172
Exactly this. Think it's great for recruiting.I think Pruitt's statements could have been partially for recruiting. He's telling recruits that the 25 guys coming in are the kind of guys he wants on the field next year. And he's putting some of the current guys on notice. The players were commenting on it, so it must be obvious to the team who's not performing at the level expected.
I have a theory that I think will be somewhat unpopular. I think Pruitt doesn't really specifically care about total wins or bowls this season. I think he wants to win, but I think he is going to force these kids to play his brand of ball all season as a tryout for who he will replace. I don't think he will put them in ridiculous positions but I don't think he will play to their strengths specifically either.
My examples include running up the gut on multiple 4th and 1's in multiple games when there is literally zero to indicate it will be successful. Sticking our guys in man against one of the most prolific offenses in the game. Then specifically saying in post game that we don't have the horses to play man but that's how you should play them. In no uncertain terms stating that about 12 guys on your team are legit SEC players.
Pros (from Pruitt's perspective)
Sets expectations, culture, and identity
Gets guys to quit to make room
Sets bar low for progress (ex: gain one short yardage 1st down)
Pressure to step up or step out should create iron sharpens iron philosophy
Potential downsides
Could cost us a win here or there by playing too rigid (we did at least throw on 1st down against Bama)
Could drive guys to quit/transfer in higher numbers than he can actually fill
Could disengage some good players that we'll need to compete this year and next
Could create culture where guys are playing tight instead of loose and backfire culturally
My 2 cents
Butch catered to some players which lead to bad chemistry and morale.
Pruitt seems to be running at mach 3 to the other Gaurd rail. I think the best approach is somewhere in the middle.
I have a theory that I think will be somewhat unpopular. I think Pruitt doesn't really specifically care about total wins or bowls this season. I think he wants to win, but I think he is going to force these kids to play his brand of ball all season as a tryout for who he will replace. I don't think he will put them in ridiculous positions but I don't think he will play to their strengths specifically either.
My examples include running up the gut on multiple 4th and 1's in multiple games when there is literally zero to indicate it will be successful. Sticking our guys in man against one of the most prolific offenses in the game. Then specifically saying in post game that we don't have the horses to play man but that's how you should play them. In no uncertain terms stating that about 12 guys on your team are legit SEC players.
Pros (from Pruitt's perspective)
Sets expectations, culture, and identity
Gets guys to quit to make room
Sets bar low for progress (ex: gain one short yardage 1st down)
Pressure to step up or step out should create iron sharpens iron philosophy
Potential downsides
Could cost us a win here or there by playing too rigid (we did at least throw on 1st down against Bama)
Could drive guys to quit/transfer in higher numbers than he can actually fill
Could disengage some good players that we'll need to compete this year and next
Could create culture where guys are playing tight instead of loose and backfire culturally
My 2 cents
Butch catered to some players which lead to bad chemistry and morale.
Pruitt seems to be running at mach 3 to the other Gaurd rail. I think the best approach is somewhere in the middle.
jeremy pruitt, kirby smart, and nick saban would be my top 3. They have deep pockets so no telling.Health could lead to Urban Meyer's exit, Paul Finebaum says
So, if Urban leaves Ohio State as he did Florida, I wonder who they go after?
I bet watching film with Pruitt is a hoot.I think Pruitt's statements could have been partially for recruiting. He's telling recruits that the 25 guys coming in are the kind of guys he wants on the field next year. And he's putting some of the current guys on notice. The players were commenting on it, so it must be obvious to the team who's not performing at the level expected.
fifyThere is hatred for an institution that is impersonal
Then there is hatred for players
Personally I draw a very clear line for myself. I hate Alabama with great disdain, but will not categorically extend that to a wide body of individuals based on their affiliation. Some interns are dirtbags, others are outstanding individuals
Personally, I regard Hurts and Tag highly... and still hate me some Bama
USC will be the litmus test for the rest of this season. I also think it will be indicative of what we can expect from Pruitt's coaching. We have equal or superior talent to them, and I challenge anyone to show me otherwise. I believe we have the better D coordinator. Many say we play better on the road, not sure if true, but whatever.
Yes they had a bye but we just got our lunch money stolen and then dad laughed at us and told us it was because we were soft and to toughen up.
I expect our team to be playing with some mean.
It just seems that way. Guy is a baller and has been committed for awhile. We need these types like Carvin who are playing a year early because of necessity. Most could use a redshirt year to bulk up and learn the scheme.He's from the state the school resides in. And we all know no good players come from that state
Teams back then were tougher and had less injuries or played through them. That can be said the further back you go.It’s tough to compare teams between eras.
Multiple people have commented about how big and roided up that Nebraska team is but a team like Alabama of Georgia would dwarf that 95 squad. I’m sure they were big for mid-90s football but the athletes today are simply much bigger, faster, and stronger.
I am not sucked into anything really, but I believe we have enough talent to compete with USC. We will see though.Don’t get sucked in too far on thinking we have more talent. We have talented players but they have better depth than we do. We will be a significant underdog for a reason - our roster is very thin.
I am with you... I would love to beat one of this @sswipe's teams.I know the rivalry doesn’t have the historical merit but ever since muschamp got af SC... they may be my most hated conference foe. Least shocking story all year was muschsmlp coming to the defense of DJ durkin for the culture he created at Maryland
Can agree. But when your coach is comparing sidelines with Bama he is comparing a roster full of 5* studs not some 3* coachable guys. We can definitely take a small highly ranked class but, our coach said publicly we will take Max even with just 4 seniors.Mixed feelings on the last part there. Obviously we've gotta land some studs to get back to being a powerhouse, but we've gotta get back to being competitive every week first.
I think it's possible to field nationally relevant teams every year if you're recruiting top 15. Just like we Butch was top 7 two years in a row and couldn't do s*** with it. The really important thing, IMO, is making sure the large majority of guys you're landing can be developed. Plus, recruiting rankings can be wonky sometimes. Clemson has landed a few really small classes the past 4-5 years that were ranked 10-15 but were 2nd or 3rd in the country in average recruit ranking.
Assuming we can land Wright I like the way our class is shaping up so far, considering where the program is at the moment. My only big concern is that I think we really need at least one instant impact type interior DL and I'm not sure we've got one of those.
If you think our OL is equal or superior to ANYONE, maybe you should challenge yourself to see otherwise.USC will be the litmus test for the rest of this season. I also think it will be indicative of what we can expect from Pruitt's coaching. We have equal or superior talent to them, and I challenge anyone to show me otherwise. I believe we have the better D coordinator. Many say we play better on the road, not sure if true, but whatever.
Yes they had a bye but we just got our lunch money stolen and then dad laughed at us and told us it was because we were soft and to toughen up.
I expect our team to be playing with some mean.