Deficit up 17%

So let's "educate" the "needy" kids, and tell the smart ones that they can pay up or dig ditches. Your philosophy put into practice will ensure that America lags behind other parts of the world... and kids from other countries that come here to study. Government in action.
Indeed. He’s all about lowering everyone in the name of equality rather than raising everyone.
 
So let's "educate" the "needy" kids, and tell the smart ones that they can pay up or dig ditches. Your philosophy put into practice will ensure that America lags behind other parts of the world... and kids from other countries that come here to study. Government in action.
What are you talking about? Are you saying you hate Harvard? If only there was a school system that gave everyone equal access.
 
Last edited:
Then I have misunderstood your need vs merit bulletpoint.

Is merit based aid not scholastic scholarship?
Harvard gives financial assistance based solely on need not merit.
My daughters are on academic based scholarships (merit, not need). Of course GT is one of them guvment skools.
 
Harvard gives financial assistance based solely on need not merit.
My daughters are on academic based scholarships (merit, not need). Of course GT is one of them guvment skools.
Harvard has no scholastic scholarships based on academic achievement?
 
lol...I vaguely remember you rambling on about something nonsensical.

We need more Harvards.
  • Aid is based entirely on need, not merit.
Do you have to try to act dumb, or does it come naturally?

Do you remember all of your references to "reasonable and rational"? That's the "nonsense" you were appealing to, Myron.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: SpaceCoastVol
What?????????? Are you serious?
Yes, you are a ****ing hypocrite. You stole money out of some needy kids' pocket. The next J.A. Roebling might be slinging fries at Mc Ds now so your daughters can save their hypocrite father some dough.

Your idol Karl Marx is pizzed at you lother
 
lol.....Public education is great. Many students and their families do suck however. I could give you thousands of examples but will refrain.

Yeah you are having students entering universites not even knowing basic American history. My brother is a professor. Do you know what many young people are doing these days? They are using texting language to write papers. Many young students cannot sign their name in cursive. They expect college professors to coddle them like they have been in high school. My brother recently gave two students Fs because their work was terrible. The students went to his chair and he had to reverse the grade and pass them. Why? Because they said that in middle and high school you cannot fail.

Public education is terrible.

Yet Another Good Reason To Abolish The Department Of Education

Seven Ways the Department of Education Has Made Higher Ed Worse — The James G. Martin Center for Academic Renewal
 
Yeah you are having students entering universites not even knowing basic American history. My brother is a professor. Do you know what many young people are doing these days? They are using texting language to write papers. Many young students cannot sign their name in cursive. They expect college professors to coddle them like they have been in high school. My brother recently gave two students Fs because their work was terrible. The students went to his chair and he had to reverse the grade and pass them. Why? Because they said that in middle and high school you cannot fail.

Public education is terrible.

Yet Another Good Reason To Abolish The Department Of Education

Seven Ways the Department of Education Has Made Higher Ed Worse — The James G. Martin Center for Academic Renewal
Luther says that public education is great; it just fails due to parents, students, home life, etc... Let me translate that for you. That means public education is a failure. If a system fails to work in the real world, it is a failure. If a system fails to take its userbase into account, it is a failure.

Luther thinks that he is defending public education, but he's actually just referencing the things that it has been unable to overcome, thus the things that make it a failure.

Then he has the cajones to say that it's a failure, which obviously proves we don't need to replace it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SpaceCoastVol
Luther says that public education is great; it just fails due to parents, students, home life, etc... Let me translate that for you. That means public education is a failure. If a system fails to work in the real world, it is a failure. If a system fails to take its userbase into account, it is a failure.

Luther thinks that he is defending public education, but he's actually just referencing the things that it has been unable to overcome, thus the things that make it a failure.

Then he has the cajones to say that it's a failure, which obviously proves we don't need to replace it.
Then health care in America is a failure. Remember that was the original point. You can't say our health care is great, it's the people who suck (which one poster claimed and many agreed); without affording education the same consideration.
 
Advertisement

Back
Top