Stidham looked like a tackling dummy at the end. He would take one look and then crumple into the fetal position. Have posted before I have never like Mahlzahn's O. Too simplistic as well stud DT QB and timing dependent. SEC DC's figured it out a few years ago. Keep their D out on the field like UGA did us with ball control and wear them down. Beat Auburn.
USCe does not win that game without rain and lightening intervention. Mizzou lost the game, USCe did not win that game. USCe is really beatable if you stop Deebo. None of their players dominate other than him. Their OC reminded me of Helton. That's not a good thing. Wake up Helton, beat USCe.
UK's QB and receivers were not ready for prime time. The QB had the deer in the headlights look - he was intimidated with the game and environment. His receivers did nothing to help him when he scrambled out of the pocket. Make the QB feel pressured, contain him, stop Snell - stop UK. It will take our lines playing big boy football, but our skill players and ST's are better overall.
Mizzou's D is really bad, especially the secondary at 3-4 positions. Their receivers are mediocre as well. Focus on Lock and the RB with pressure. Don't take the foot off the scoring accelerator. Beat Mizzou.
No analysis needed for Vandy. Just focus and win.
IMO that's how they go about winning 5 SEC games to finish out the schedule. It's on the roster and coaches to believe, strain, and execute. I do not "expect" us to win any of them except Vandy. I just know if they decide to man up and play to win for 60 minutes they have a reasonable shot to win all five. The real condition of the roster and any weak links in coaches will be clearly revealed from this point on. They've had their week off to regroup, take stock of where they are, and revise their plans for improvement. I count Charlotte and Vandy as wins. Need two more to gain the extra bowl prep practices. Will see how it goes.