I resent the fact that the committee called the current allegations "credible"
How does an allegation get to be considered credible, what the hell is the burden of proof for credible these days?
Zero corroborations
Zero time
Zero date
Zero definite amount of people even there
Zero for 4 or 5 chances for the other people she named to even say K was there, period.
Zero physical evidence or paper trail.
How does that make a "credible" allegation?
Is that what constitutes a credible allegation against those senators?
If i made an accusation against 1 of them and presented zero evidence, would it be credible enough for the other senators to ask for an FBI investigation?
CONFIRM HIM NOW.
I would be flat pissed if i was K. Pissed.
Any Dem that came before me on the SC would get ripped a new 1, for a decade.