Kavanaugh Confirmation

I was wondering what you thought of Ks testimony yesterday after you said you believed Ford as soon as she read her opening . Being a dem and a woman .
If he hadn't lied under oath, I would say to go ahead and vote. He lied about his past and two other women came forward.. Let the FBI investigate or just go ahead and nominate another Republican.
 
I like how the dims are trying to spin the lack of an FBI investigation even though they knew about this a month and half before it was released and could have had that investigation..OOPS.
 
Evil and Dems keep telling us this is just a job interview and is NOT A TRIAL. All the arguments about an FBI investigation are being grounded in what happens in trials.

So which is it?

If it's just a job interview, you make a judgment based on what you hear. They've heard.
It's a trial interview
 
Kavanaugh lied under oath about the meaning of Boofing and Devil's triangle.. Also, a man involved in such things might possibly be drunk enough to do what Ms. Ford says he did.

Why not an investigation? I don't want a sexual molester on the Supreme court, REpublican or Democrat.

Please Ma'am, Tell us the TRUE meanings please. You seem to be an EXPERT! Oh, pictures are a MUST.
 
If he hadn't lied under oath, I would say to go ahead and vote. He lied about his past and two other women came forward.. Let the FBI investigate or just go ahead and nominate another Republican.
What lies? And explain how you know he was lying. Thanks.
 
If he hadn't lied under oath, I would say to go ahead and vote. He lied about his past and two other women came forward.. Let the FBI investigate or just go ahead and nominate another Republican.
Perjury is not something politicians let slide. It's the perfect "gotcha". If he lied under oath, is anyone bringing perjury charges?
 
It actually shows she is exaggerating, which goes to her credibility. The problem is, she really didn't provide any facts, not really to where her credibility could be used to weigh her testimony. There is basically no information or facts, the only facts she really has provided is there was "a party/gathering", she was assaulted/assisted by 1 or 2 people(?), yet none of that can be collaborated. She is a bad witness because she really isn't a witness to anything, not really. What she did provide has been more or less shot down by 5 people, so her credibility has nothing to do with it, not really.

The worse part about the flying bit as she got caught red-handed doubling down on the lie, which is she said congress wouldn't take her testimony in California, then she shut the F up. LOL

The whole thing sounds made up, why, no facts. Its like an alien abducted her with a holobeam. LOL
I don't think she was ever assaulted by anyone. Before her testimony I was willing to give her the benefit of the doubt. After yesterday I think it's a complete fabrication.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 82_VOL_83
Kavanaugh lied under oath about the meaning of Boofing and Devil's triangle.. Also, a man involved in such things might possibly be drunk enough to do what Ms. Ford says he did.

Why not an investigation? I don't want a sexual molester on the Supreme court, REpublican or Democrat.
Could you please provide your proof that his answers were lies?
 
As long as Toobin is crying and moaning you know we’re on the right path.
Someone on Twitter pointed out yesterday how much of a joke it is for CNN to call Toobin their "Chief Legal Analyst." Such a title implies that he's unbiased, just there to call balls and strikes. He is presented as the umpire in a baseball game, but he sits there and critiques a team's batting order, says the bullpen decision in the 7th inning was stupid, and says the team's cleanup hitter is overrated.

That's fine if he wants to do that, but don't call him an umpire. I don't mind opinions in news, even ones I disagree with. Just don't be disingenuous about it. Calling opinions facts drives me crazy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: McDad
Advertisement

Back
Top