Kavanaugh Confirmation

This whole thing is scary.

That one person with no physical evidence can accuse someone of something like this from 25-30+ years ago and the person being accused has no way of defending themselves other their own word.
Sorry she stopped them from collecting semen on her bating suit.
 
Vietnam Blumenthal is an idot. He basically said that the real reason they are against him is because he might over turn Roe v Wade and the affordable care act.
 
I hear everyone saying that she was compelling. Do we destroy someone because somebody's testimony was compelling? Or do we base it on facts?

If the vote gets canned over this, an extremely dangerous precedent will be established. We could see the collapse of American society as we know it.
 
Question is if she or anyone spoke to a senator on her behalf after the 7th of August. Dr. Ford some how doesnt understand the question...
 
This whole thing is scary.

That one person with no physical evidence can accuse someone of something like this from 25-30+ years ago and the person being accused has no way of defending themselves other their own word.

The next step will be late accusations against a candidate a couple days before an election. And then the MSM will immediately say "he may not be guilty, but you can't vote for that person now with the vote in 2 days."
 
  • Like
Reactions: CagleMtnVol
I hear everyone saying that she was compelling. Do we destroy someone because somebody's testimony was compelling? Or do we base it on facts?

If the vote gets canned over this, an extremely dangerous precedent will be established. We could see the collapse of American society as we know it.
Some people voted for Trump for just that reason.
 
I hear everyone saying that she was compelling. Do we destroy someone because somebody's testimony was compelling? Or do we base it on facts?

If the vote gets canned over this, an extremely dangerous precedent will be established. We could see the collapse of American society as we know it.
Don’t be stupid dude
 
I hear everyone saying that she was compelling. Do we destroy someone because somebody's testimony was compelling? Or do we base it on facts?

If the vote gets canned over this, an extremely dangerous precedent will be established. We could see the collapse of American society as we know it.

What are the facts?
 
The next step will be late accusations against a candidate a couple days before an election. And then the MSM will immediately say "he may not be guilty, but you can't vote for that person now with the vote in 2 days."
I think we have done and seen it but how many people in jobs across the country will have accusations made simply because someone might not like you. "He didn't give me that promotion. I'll go to HR and he will destroy him!"
 
Advertisement

Back
Top