Kavanaugh Confirmation

#4,378
#4,378
Mick said:
I suppose if one of your daughters came to you and said she was sexually assaulted that you would call her a liar.
Click to expand...

Neither of K's accusers even spoke to their parents to begin with though.

If her parents are still alive (which chances are at least one of them are), they could corroborate the details of her story.
 
#4,379
#4,379
Stew Cook said:
I realize people have been conditioned to dislike this or that person. Do you want to argue that he isn't effective, or that he lacks morality? Now let's apply the same standard to nearly any politician. For whatever reason, some believe Avanatti must be shamed above and beyond any other attorney.

Not missing your point, but I wouldn't think twice about using him, if my needs dictated such.
Click to expand...

I’m not conditioned other than to pay attention to my instincts about people . I don’t miss many times when I do that instead of ignoring them . My instincts after listening and watching him many times, scream he’s a sleaze ball that will do anything or say anything for the right amount of $$$
 
#4,380
#4,380
Septic said:
The setting is irrelevant to the fact that old sexual allegations are being used to derail the wants of partisan foes. I'm not suggesting one is acceptable and one isn't, but for the right to pretend that the left invented this tomfuqery is disingenuous.
Click to expand...

The Supreme court is the one branch of government that shouldn't be politicised. It's definitely different that a political campaign.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Matt2496
#4,382
#4,382
txbo said:
The Supreme court is the one branch of government that shouldn't be politicised. It's definitely different that a political campaign.
Click to expand...

I agree with this.

Sadly, there's plenty of politicization on both sides regarding the Supreme Court.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Septic
#4,384
#4,384
0nelilreb said:
I’m not conditioned other than to pay attention to my instincts about people . I don’t miss many times when I do that instead of ignoring them . My instincts after listening and watching him many times, scream he’s a sleaze ball that will do anything or say anything for the right amount of $$$
Click to expand...

The money thing, I agree. But that's not unique among lawyers.
 
#4,385
#4,385
0nelilreb said:
No I would ask her for the story , encourage her to give me all the details because that’s what the police will ask her and reassure her that everything will be ok no matter what .
Click to expand...
Now you are in the he said/she said debate. Who would you believe if she told you 30 years later. Would you require her to present witnesses or a semen soaked dress or would your bias get in the way of believing, without proof, your little girl?
 
#4,386
#4,386
Stew Cook said:
I was going off the accounts being described by Raj Shah, he seemed very careful to describe them that way.
Click to expand...

I'm going by what their actual statements are - there's more there than "I don't recall". I don't know who Raj Shah is but everyone who's "analyzing" this brings their own interpretation. The statements are the most direct evidence.
 
#4,387
#4,387
0nelilreb said:
I’m not conditioned other than to pay attention to my instincts about people . I don’t miss many times when I do that instead of ignoring them . My instincts after listening and watching him many times, scream he’s a sleaze ball that will do anything or say anything for the right amount of $$$
Click to expand...

He's trying to be the male Gloria Allred for the left.
 
  • Like
Reactions: volfanjustin and SpaceCoastVol
#4,389
#4,389
volinbham said:
I'm going by what their actual statements are - there's more there than "I don't recall". I don't know who Raj Shah is but everyone who's "analyzing" this brings their own interpretation. The statements are the most direct evidence.
Click to expand...

White House aide/spokesman.
 
#4,390
#4,390
txbo said:
The Supreme court is the one branch of government that shouldn't be politicised. It's definitely different that a political campaign.
Click to expand...


Merrick Garland called.

1*CZwduK0VQReY6sCYSa4udg.gif
 
#4,391
#4,391
Mick said:
Now you are in the he said/she said debate. Who would you believe if she told you 30 years later. Would you require her to present witnesses or a semen soaked dress or would your bias get in the way of believing, without proof, your little girl?
Click to expand...

Labeling every unwanted advance as sexual assault doesn't help my or anyones daughters.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BigOrangeD
#4,392
#4,392
As I predicted, the unbelievable (and completely gratuitious) claim by Kavanaugh that he was a virgin throughout HS and for many years thereafter, is starting to look like a big ol' lie. This tweet from a freshman year friend at Yale.

 
#4,395
#4,395
evillawyer said:
As I predicted, the unbelievable (and completely gratuitious) claim by Kavanaugh that he was a virgin throughout HS and for many years thereafter, is starting to look like a big ol' lie. This tweet from a freshman year friend at Yale.

Click to expand...


People don't lie about being a virgin?
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top