volinbham
VN GURU
- Joined
- Oct 21, 2004
- Messages
- 70,373
- Likes
- 64,360
Cabvol wasn't being sarcastic. I should have addressed him.Why shouldn't I believe CABVOL? The accusation seems credible and people have deleted accounts and returned with other names. OBV was a poster here but hasn't been seen in a while. It all adds up. The real question is why would you question CABVOL. #cabstoo
Clearly sarcasm is lost on you.
So not getting a SCOTUS appointment is ruining someone's career?
If that was his career goal, then yes.
And in doing so they've attempted to tarnish his reputation.
Maybe this happened, but maybe it didn't. No proof exists. Just an accusation. And let's not pretend truth is what is being sought. Dems are not looking for truth. It's a purely political attempt to subvert the system.
The masses don't even know who Kavenaugh is. They just know something political is happening.
I don't think anybody will necessarily break Republican. I DO think it will provide the GOP with something to fundraise off of and motivate the base to show up and hold onto the Senate.So why would they break in favor of the Republicans if it's just viewed as "something political." Don't both sides have the argument that the other side is engaging in politics? The Dems say the Republicans are trying to ram this through so they can get him confirmed before they potentially lose the senate; the Republicans say the Dems are stalling this in the hopes of taking back the senate and blocking the confirmation.
Yes, people usually want an FBI investigation when they don't care about the truth. Given that lying to the FBI is a felony, I doubt they're calling in the FBI if they don't care about the truth.
Yes, people usually want an FBI investigation when they don't care about the truth. Given that lying to the FBI is a felony, I doubt they're calling in the FBI if they don't care about the truth.
They’ve had 10 weeks to investigate this guy, ask questions, present these accusations, etc. I hardly think this constitutes “ramming him through”.So why would they break in favor of the Republicans if it's just viewed as "something political." Don't both sides have the argument that the other side is engaging in politics? The Dems say the Republicans are trying to ram this through so they can get him confirmed before they potentially lose the senate; the Republicans say the Dems are stalling this in the hopes of taking back the senate and blocking the confirmation.
On the other hand they've also had this info on Dr. Ford for about 6 weeks. So they've also had time to check this story out. But they'll say this is too fast and the lemmings all agree in unison.They’ve had 10 weeks to investigate this guy, ask questions, present these accusations, etc. I hardly think this constitutes “ramming him through”.
I don’t think the democrats can take a chance to nominate a male SCJ for at least the next generation.
Don't play stupid. You know full well that's just another excuse to delay confirmation hearings. I know your persona on here requires you be a partisan hack, but please tell me you're intelligent enough to see this for what it is.
What impact does an investigation have on whatever Dr. Ford might recount about the incident?Took the FBI all of three days to do the investigation of Thomas in response to Anita Hill's concerns.
What impact does an investigation have on whatever Dr. Ford might recount about the incident?
Until she actually makes a specific accusation and offers some details, this is the political equivalent of asking "Do you still beat your wife?"
Took the FBI all of three days to do the investigation of Thomas in response to Anita Hill's concerns.