Kavanaugh Confirmation

#1,710
#1,710
NEOCON said:
If only we could all bring that in depth world view to the table like you do then all would be better.

I sit in the shadow of your greatest oh wise one. Your words are like psalms rivaling the great King David himself.

We thank you for blessing this forum with your wisdom and allowing us to soak in the glory of your being.

Praise be to TennTom. Fearless leader of the halfwit Dems.
Click to expand...
You're so much like Happy-Meal-Go, only with some childish wit. He makes a lot of useless, unbalanced posts, too.
 
#1,711
#1,711
A man who has worked his way through the legal ranks, and exemplified impeccable acumen while doing so, is all the sudden a rapist?

Go ahead, block him.

If the reports are true about dims wanting to keep the lid on Trump releasing texts/details concerning the DOJ and FBI, in trade for pushing Kavanaugh through, I’d tell them to eat ****.

Expose them, let them smear/block Kavanaugh (****ty, but so be it...not like they aren’t already attempting it), lose the midterms in resounding fashion, appoint a staunch righty that would make Kavanaugh look like Ginsburg.

WIN-WIN-WIN! ✅

Liberals want to wreak havoc, we will make their world hell for decades to come. If Ginsburg would take her old ass on, the GOP may not lose another major election for YEARS to come, due to mass suicide.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 82_VOL_83 and BigOrangeD
#1,712
#1,712
evillawyer said:
She's not a witness to the event itself, but she is a witness to rebut the claim that this story was only concocted to defeat Kavanaugh's confirmation.
Click to expand...

To be fair, almost no one is not making that claim; particularly given we know she talked about this 2012.

What do you think about her lament about being expected to remember all the details?
 
  • Like
Reactions: marcusluvsvols and BigOrangeD
#1,713
#1,713
evillawyer said:
Kavanaugh has no legal entitlement to a SCOTUS seat. He's basically going through a glorified job interview. There will be no finding of facts or determinations of law. He will simply be given an up or down vote. The senate can vote for or against him based on his tie color. Stop acting like the man's on trial. He's not.
Click to expand...

Dems have put him on trial in the court of public opinion. His reputation is being challenged and tarnished so they can give their constituents a valid reason to oppose him. Claiming they shot him down because they believed he was a sexual predator plays better than the truth that it's partisan politics. They had no reasonable rationalization to stop his confirmation until this lady came forward.
 
#1,714
#1,714
NorthDallas40 said:
She isn’t a witness to a damn thing more than we are all witnesses to the **** show you libtards have turned this nomination into.
Click to expand...

So when a prisoner is called to testify about his cellmate confessing to a crime that the cellmate committed prior to being incarcerated the testifying prisoner is not a witness to anything?
 
#1,720
#1,720
Weezer said:
Dems have put him on trial in the court of public opinion. His reputation is being challenged and tarnished so they can give their constituents a valid reason to oppose him. Claiming they shot him down because they believed he was a sexual predator plays better than the truth that it's partisan politics. They had no reasonable rationalization to stop his confirmation until this lady came forward.
Click to expand...
There were plenty of valid reasons to oppose him before this came up.
 
#1,724
#1,724
volinbham said:
So everyone that K. told this didn't happen is a witness. Got it.
Click to expand...
But he told them after he had an clear interest in denying the allegation. What was her interest in telling people (privately) about an attempted sexual assault before he was up for anything?
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top