luthervol
rational (x) and reasonable (y)
- Joined
- Apr 17, 2016
- Messages
- 48,136
- Likes
- 20,794
I have a hard time believing a guy who attended Harvard and Yale and who was a former naval prosecutor would so recklessly choose his words. There's dozens of ways to characterize his phrase and yet he chose that way. I guess, I'm one of the crazy ones, too.
It's much more covert than overt. Now overt, that would be fascinating.I find it fascinating. Trump is an overt racist, his supporters are overt racists, the balance of republicans are overt racists, yet all of them find it necessary to send each other secret racist code words through the media lest anyone find out.
That's some sound logic right there.I have a hard time believing any adult with an IQ above their shoe size, has to stretch credulity this far to arrive at “racist”.
And y’all wonder how Trump is in office, why? This **** right here is why he will almost assuredly be re-elected in 2020.
Well, now I know I'm right. Thanks for the confirmation, Squirts.I have a hard time believing any adult with an IQ above their shoe size, has to stretch credulity this far to arrive at “racist”.
And y’all wonder how Trump is in office, why? This **** right here is why he will almost assuredly be re-elected in 2020.
That's some sound logic right there.
Is this correct? "you lefties are crazy so we're going to elect a despicable buffoon in retaliation."
Do a few searches for the definition of "monkey up." This is the only one I found (from the dictionary of computing of all places): monkey up | Definition of monkey up by Webster's Online Dictionary. Obviously not applicable here.
Plenty of ways to say mess something up. Yet running against a black candidate he chose to use --and quite obviously so -- a phrase that includes "monkey" and which doesn't even exist in common parlance. Sorry, but this is not a stretch to say he was dog whistling with this.
"Mr. Bezos continues to pay many thousands of his Amazon employees wages that are so low that they are forced to depend on taxpayer-funded programs, such as food stamps, Medicaid and subsidized housing in order to survive," Sanders said in the video, stressing that taxpayers foot the bill for these benefits. "Frankly, I don't believe that ordinary Americans should be subsidizing the wealthiest people in the world because they pay their employees inadequate wages."
Kamala Harris wants you to help pay California people's rent
“In CA, rent for a typical one bedroom apartment at market rate is over $1,300. If you’re earning minimum wage in CA, which is $11, you would need to work at least two jobs to afford that apartment without being stretched to the limit. The Rent Relief Act would ease that burden,” she tweeted.
Wait, so Cal has countless laws that help account for the high prices of real estate in Cal but, Kamala wants a new law to help pay for rent, unbelievable.Kamala Harris wants you to help pay California people's rent
“In CA, rent for a typical one bedroom apartment at market rate is over $1,300. If you’re earning minimum wage in CA, which is $11, you would need to work at least two jobs to afford that apartment without being stretched to the limit. The Rent Relief Act would ease that burden,” she tweeted.
The percentage of people working two jobs is at historic lows, but sure.Kamala Harris wants you to help pay California people's rent
“In CA, rent for a typical one bedroom apartment at market rate is over $1,300. If you’re earning minimum wage in CA, which is $11, you would need to work at least two jobs to afford that apartment without being stretched to the limit. The Rent Relief Act would ease that burden,” she tweeted.
Liberal logic and she is a front runner for the dem nomination in 2020. They all have to see who can get to the left of crazy Bernie to get the nominationWait, so Cal has countless laws that help account for the high prices of real estate in Cal but, Kamala wants a new law to help pay for rent, unbelievable.
If a Harvard law grad can forget how many states there are, they can probably not give a thought to would an empty phrase offend someone.I have a hard time believing a guy who attended Harvard and Yale and who was a former naval prosecutor would so recklessly choose his words. There's dozens of ways to characterize his phrase and yet he chose that way. I guess, I'm one of the crazy ones, too.
That's some sound logic right there.
Is this correct? "you lefties are crazy so we're going to elect a despicable buffoon in retaliation."
You said "no" and then preceded to prove my point. Impressive.No, you lefties subverted the election system with your attempted coronation of another elitist socialist. Despicable, no deplorable is a better term, buffoon became the obvious choice. Yes, if he runs again he will win because you continue in the same vain never learning bigly.