West Virginia Scouting Report

Who wrote this? It is as bias as anything I have read in a long time. Their defense has been and is one of the worst in the nation. At all positions just about they are awful. The DL from USC was retired and is a cripple. The Clemson DL is the only guy they have with a heartbeat. Everyone else is likely awful no reason to over think it. This may be the worst defense we play all year including Charlotte. They were dead last in rankings last year in their conference. Something like 109 out of 129 in the nation. They don't have good safeties. They don't have good football players on D period.

Their offense is good but somewhat overrated. 4th in conference last year. It is the Grier show. He runs around making plays while Dana drinks from a keg on the sideline. Dana drinks with media members and has thus one many over creating this year's hype. They are a 6-6 type of team in the Big 12.

A bad defense with good players? No way! impossible! How could they?!?

Washington had the 97th ranked Defense in 2014, that D had 3 1st round picks (Shaq Thompson, Danny Shelton, Marcus Peters) and a 2nd round pick (Kikaha). You can have good players and be a bad defense. WVU has some really good players on D, we are still bad.
 
A bad defense with good players? No way! impossible! How could they?!?

Washington had the 97th ranked Defense in 2014, that D had 3 1st round picks (Shaq Thompson, Danny Shelton, Marcus Peters) and a 2nd round pick (Kikaha). You can have good players and be a bad defense. WVU has some really good players on D, we are still bad.
Comparatively speaking... you don't. We don't compare you to Iowa State. We compare you to UF or even Ole Miss. We've spent considerable time this August arguing and hoping that grad transfers aren't really needed to start since they couldn't cut it at their previous stop. The exception being Kennedy who would have competed to start at Bama. You're hanging your hopes on two transfers that couldn't start for top tier programs. I'm sorry if that upsets you. It isn't saying that you don't have a "good" team with "good" players. But when we think "really good"... we're talking guys who would go on the first day of the NFL draft as Freshmen or Sophs. We're talking the kinds of players fielded by Bama, LSU, UF, UGA, TAM, Auburn... even MSU, Ole Miss, USC, and Mizzou at times.

That would be a good question for you. Mizzou doesn't have a "scary" D. Do you have a Terry Beckner Jr on your DL? A Derrick Barnett? A Myles Garrett?

I know I'm picking your nits and maybe parsing your words a little... but I've watched your D from last year. Long is a good LB. I don't see anyone else that's "scary".
 
Of the defensive players that transferred, only 4 would have played this year. Jordan Adams, Adam Shuller, Lamont McDougle, and maaaaaybe Kevin Williams. Adams came back. Shuller and McDougle are big losses for depth, but they were supposed team cancers. Kevin Williams was a complete unknown, though I was excited about him when we first recruited him. He had a great cut up.

Our depth is an issue, but it's always been an issue. We won 10 games and had a top 60 D with less depth than we have right now. It's worrisome, but I don't think it's gonna be an issue vs Tennessee.
Im glad you are not worried about Tennessee. Tennessee is a team with far more talent on the roster than WVU. According to 247, WVU has an average class rank of 41 over the last 5 years, Tennessee’s is 12.8. I’ll admit that I don’t see WVU as a cake walk. They have an impressive QB and receiving corps. Best in the country? Doubtful! That being said, it is arrogant to simply look at Tennessee’s record from last year and determine we are a cupcake team. We were injured and very poorly coached. The players have even made reference to the difference in practice this year. Will we be a SECCG or BCSCG contender? Highly doubtful! What we will do under Pruitt is come out to play power football, and I expect Tennessee’s offense to punch a poor WVU defense square in the jaw. Your lack of depth will be problematic. Will Tennessee win? I sure hope so, but, if not, I doubt we see WVU run away with it. Your first post was classy, but since then the quality is reminiscent of some other bogus WVU boards I’ve seen. Best of luck to you in the Big 12 this year, but I don’t see WVU as a contender on the national stage.
 
Im glad you are not worried about Tennessee. Tennessee is a team with far more talent on the roster than WVU. According to 247, WVU has an average class rank of 41 over the last 5 years, Tennessee’s is 12.8. I’ll admit that I don’t see WVU as a cake walk. They have an impressive QB and receiving corps. Best in the country? Doubtful! That being said, it is arrogant to simply look at Tennessee’s record from last year and determine we are a cupcake team. We were injured and very poorly coached. The players have even made reference to the difference in practice this year. Will we be a SECCG or BCSCG contender? Highly doubtful! What we will do under Pruitt is come out to play power football, and I expect Tennessee’s offense to punch a poor WVU defense square in the jaw. Your lack of depth will be problematic. Will Tennessee win? I sure hope so, but, if not, I doubt we see WVU run away with it. Your first post was classy, but sincere then the quality is reminiscent of some other bogus WVU boards I’ve seen. Best of luck to you in the Big 12 this year, but I don’t see WVU as a contender on the national stage.

I wasn't saying it won't be an issue vs Tennessee because of the quality of Tennessee. I was saying because it's week 1. Players should be relatively fresh and able to handle a hefty workload. Obviously, you still sub in DL like a Hockey team, but we should be relatively fine on numbers barring injuries.
 
  • Like
Reactions: vols4evah
I wasn't saying it won't be an issue vs Tennessee because of the quality of Tennessee. I was saying because it's week 1. Players should be relatively fresh and able to handle a hefty workload. Obviously, you still sub in DL like a Hockey team, but we should be relatively fine on numbers barring injuries.
It sounds like the weather isn't going to help you there. It will be over 90 and muggy in Charlotte according to current forecasts.
 
It sounds like the weather isn't going to help you there. It will be over 90 and muggy in Charlotte according to current forecasts.

Could end up hurting both defenses. Tennessee DB's will be doing a lot of chasing followed by a lot of hurry up. Both teams should be thoroughly blown up.
 
Could end up hurting both defenses. Tennessee DB's will be doing a lot of chasing followed by a lot of hurry up. Both teams should be thoroughly blown up.
UT appears to have more "bodies" than WVU. On D, I'm not sure either of us truly knows what we have... but UT appears to have more guys they can put on the field athletically. Plus, UT is going to want to run the ball at you between the tackles and use a controlled passing game. I think one of you guys pointed out that your O was boom or bust. Either 3 and out or a 4 play TD drive in less than 2 minutes. Those factors would seem to favor UT.
 
My saying at work when people ask me how the VOLS are going to do... "We are the team to beat!" (because they did)
 
Could end up hurting both defenses. Tennessee DB's will be doing a lot of chasing followed by a lot of hurry up. Both teams should be thoroughly blown up.
We will get to Grier..He will be doing a lot of running to stay right side up.....
Our DB's will have time to rest while we put 6 - 8 minute drives together marching down the field...
GBO
 
UT appears to have more "bodies" than WVU. On D, I'm not sure either of us truly knows what we have... but UT appears to have more guys they can put on the field athletically. Plus, UT is going to want to run the ball at you between the tackles and use a controlled passing game. I think one of you guys pointed out that your O was boom or bust. Either 3 and out or a 4 play TD drive in less than 2 minutes. Those factors would seem to favor UT.

Yeah, the offense was boom or bust. Luckily, that means it had "boom", which Tennessee's completely lacked. ;)
 
Yeah, the offense was boom or bust. Luckily, that means it had "boom", which Tennessee's completely lacked. ;)
Yeah. A minority of us here never bought into Jones or his system. He was a bad coach who thought of himself as an innovator and reinventor of football. Between his bad scheme, "techniques", poor development, and poor S&C UT's players weren't used well. Usually UT had 8 or even more guys from the 2 deep injured for any given game... including the early season ones.

The thing you keep seeming to ignore though... is that guys like Calloway, Jennings, Smith, et al are talented guys who haven't been coached well or played in a system that works well without a Dobbs to bail it out.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tennessee Waltz
Yeah. A minority of us here never bought into Jones or his system. He was a bad coach who thought of himself as an innovator and reinventor of football. Between his bad scheme, "techniques", poor development, and poor S&C UT's players weren't used well. Usually UT had 8 or even more guys from the 2 deep injured for any given game... including the early season ones.

The thing you keep seeming to ignore though... is that guys like Calloway, Jennings, Smith, et al are talented guys who haven't been coached well or played in a system that works well without a Dobbs to bail it out.

I'm not ignoring it. How could I. You're only the 40th person to remind me that you guys have a truly elite roster only hampered by dreadful coaching, and you will no doubt drop a hammer on us on the way to a dominant season.

But if I DARE say that WVU has the best receiving corp in the nation, i'm a nut.

This isn't really directed at you, btw. You've been cool. Just in general.
 
Strict Ed,

Stay on Volnation after Sept 1st.

I think WVU and our own division will suprised at the team we field this year.

Our front 7 is a prototype 3-4 personal size n speed wise. Our O-Line and RBs will be one of the better ones you play all season.

WVU has a good exxciting team. But this is a bad match-up for them
 
Strict Ed,

Stay on Volnation after Sept 1st.

I think WVU and our own division will suprised at the team we field this year.

Our front 7 is a prototype 3-4 personal size n speed wise. Our O-Line and RBs will be one of the better ones you play all season.

WVU has a good exxciting team. But this is a bad match-up for them

If we lose, I'll come back. I will not if we win. I cannot stand homers after a loss. That goes for WVU fans as well. Never give the winning team credit. It's always something you did instead of something that was done to you.

Not to mention, I don't really like talking smack. I've only really even talked smack on here in defense. I understand that to some people, when your team loses, it ruins your week. i'm not gonna come on and brag about my team beating yours when you're on the edge of throwing your computer at the wall.

But if we lose, I'll come on. I swear.
 
USC, Ohio State, Alabama, Notre Dame, Michigan, Texas, and maaaaybe Oklahoma and Miami are the schools that I've heard considered Blue Bloods. Clemson is kind of a new school blue blood. Florida, Georgia, Florida State, Nebraska, etc. are 2nd tier, but not blue blood.

Just wanted to nitpick your terminology. "Blue blood" by definition connotes a long-standing or historical affiliation, such as being a member of an aristocratic or noble family. Part of the point of the term is to make a distinction from the nouveau riche, so it's contradictory to say that Clemson is "a new school blue blood"; there just is no such thing.

I think JP was correct in that Tennessee's status as a blue blood depends on where you draw the line. But it's not really a quantitative matter of how many teams should get to be called blue blood — is it the top 5? top 10? Rather, I think you would have to make a subjective judgment on the historic prominence of a program, and there are potentially blue blooded programs who have been out of championship contention for much longer than Tennessee. I'll leave all those arguments for someone else.

I think maybe "blue chip" might be a better term for what you're talking about, as it refers to a more immediate valuation. Blue chip programs would indicate current (or even relatively recent) prominence and relevance, something Tennessee hasn't really had for a while, although the other schools on your list have.
 
I'm not ignoring it. How could I. You're only the 40th person to remind me that you guys have a truly elite roster only hampered by dreadful coaching, and you will no doubt drop a hammer on us on the way to a dominant season.

But if I DARE say that WVU has the best receiving corp in the nation, i'm a nut.

This isn't really directed at you, btw. You've been cool. Just in general.
Maybe better wording would have been "dismissing it"? UT has been through some bad years. I don't know what they'll do. I don't know if they were close enough development wise for Pruitt to turn them around this quick. My only point is that UT has talent that you shouldn't just hand wave.
 
Just wanted to nitpick your terminology. "Blue blood" by definition connotes a long-standing or historical affiliation, such as being a member of an aristocratic or noble family. Part of the point of the term is to make a distinction from the nouveau riche, so it's contradictory to say that Clemson is "a new school blue blood"; there just is no such thing.

I think JP was correct in that Tennessee's status as a blue blood depends on where you draw the line. But it's not really a quantitative matter of how many teams should get to be called blue blood — is it the top 5? top 10? Rather, I think you would have to make a subjective judgment on the historic prominence of a program, and there are potentially blue blooded programs who have been out of championship contention for much longer than Tennessee. I'll leave all those arguments for someone else.

I think maybe "blue chip" might be a better term for what you're talking about, as it refers to a more immediate valuation. Blue chip programs would indicate current (or even relatively recent) prominence and relevance, something Tennessee hasn't really had for a while, although the other schools on your list have.

You're right.
 
There has been significant back and forth in this thread, and in large part I would attribute much of that to the Tennessee faithful chomping at the bit to see something that isn't the Butch Jones show in eight days. I can't lie, that I am in that group. However, aside from knowing that we have talent and potential on our team, I don't think I'm wrong to say that we really don't know what we have until they strap on the pads and hit the field. We don't know what the offense is going to look like, because none of the players have played in a power running scheme since they hit campus. Our defense has not run a 3-4, and we don't really know how that transition is going to look.

OFFENSE:
On offense, I think we have a good foundation to build upon in the OL. From left to right we can reasonably assume we will see some combination of Trey Smith (LT), Ryan Johnson, Jerome Carvin, Riley Locklear (LG), Brandon Kennedy (C), Johson, Carvin, Locklear (RG), and Drew Richmond, Chance Hall (RT). Now, I have heard reports of Calbert and Marcus Tatum, and I expect both to likely play in the opener.

Behind the line, RB should be a solid group, although the coaches seem to think that Chandler is a bit small - I still think he starts and gets a bulk of the carries. That said, Tim Jordan and Madre London will round out a RB by committee, and the carries may be spread more evenly or they might ride the guy with a hot hand if one emerges.

QB? Much like the RB's, I think that Guarantano starts but that we see Keller Chryst also. I hope that they find a QB and stick with him, but I do not expect that Jeremy Pruitt - of the Saban school - will be extremely forgiving if JG goes out there and lobs a couple interceptions, of which he has thrown several during practices and scrimmages.

And the WR's are a talented bunch that has shown flashes but lacks consistency. Jauan Jennings is a tough as nails player, but he hasn't played a game in almost a calendar year. I love him as a player, and I hope that he gives WVU's defensive backs hell, because we all know that he is a physical blocker that just flat out plays ball. Marquez Callaway can make flashy plays, but outside of the GT game last year, he disappeared in several games. Brandon Johnson is a solid possession guy with relatively sure hands, but he has yet to show that he can hit home runs. Then there is Josh Palmer, who has been lauded in two preseasons now, but his dropped balls last year still make me want to beat my head into the wall.

Then you have the coaching questions on Offense. How will Tyson Helton call a game? We really don't know. I am expecting a 60-40 run to pass ratio, but I have no clue. I think many are of the opinion that we ground and pound and they try to dink and dunk in the passing game. I'll be happy with that, because I think it matches what should be our strength against the weakness of a WVU defense that was no good last year against the run and which is built to stop a pass happy Big 12 conference.

DEFENSE:

Defense is a big question mark as well, though we know that we have some talent at two position groups. Defensive line has solid athletes in the starting rotation, Alexis Johnson, Shy Tuttle, and Kyle Phillips were all highly regarded players coming out of their recruitment. Tuttle was a stud prior to injury, but has been set back for two seasons now. Alexis Johnson was never in really solid shape last season, largely because he didn't get to practice in fall camp last year while he sat out for what was ultimately a dismissed domestic violence charge. And Kyle Phillips was fundamentally sound last year, but has never lived up to his five star billing. Emmitt Gooden should be a plug and play guy at DT, but from his Last Chance U tape, he makes some dumb decisions (I think I counted at least four late hit penalties in just what they showed from their games). Outside of those four, we don't really know what is there...Matthew Butler? Deondre Johnson? Eric Crosby? (I'm not even sure that two of those are still playing DL. WVU has a veteran O-line that is seemingly built to pass block, and I can see our guys having some success against them stopping the run and hopefully harrying Grier to help out our secondary.

Linebacking corps should be where we hang our hat on defense. All three of Bituli, Sapp, and Kirkland are solid starters, and potentially a couple of NFL guys in that mix. They can all run, and have experience. Hopefully we can keep Kirkland healthy throughout the season, but I fully expect him to play in this game. This unit should stuff WVU's run, and hopefully can cover the pass when asked. On the edges, Darrell Taylor is a solid football player who has speed and a nose for the QB. He should find some success rushing the passer, because we anticipate that WVU throws a LOT in this game. I'm still in a wait and see with Kongbo who has in no way lived up to his recruiting rating to this point. Yet again we've been told he looks like Adonis and is ready to make an impact. I'll personally believe it when I see it. Overall, however, the LB should be the strength of the defense.

This brings us to the secondary. Who knows? At Safety, Warrior is a starter on most SEC squads, but behind him Abernathy and Kelly can be liabilities at times. Trevon Flowers has been heralded as a player with potential but he's a freshman. Alontae Taylor is apparently penciled in as a starter at Corner, with Baylen Buchanen on the other side. That is a dearth of experience. I love Taylor's upside, and Buchanen can be solid, I believe, but he's on the shorter side. Then Shamburger playing Nickel is another position change. Now, Jeremy Pruitt is a secondary specialist, and I believe that this unit will be far better coached between him and Terry Fair, however this is the weakness of our defense against the strength of WVU's offense.

On defense, we really have no clue how the team's transition to a 3-4 will go, but I think we have a solid unit solely based upon the coaching upgrade. Will they be keyed in for game 1 against a team that is receiving ALL the hype as having a stellar offense? I don't know, and if we're being honest, none of us do.

I think our special teams units will be lackluster, and I honestly don't know enough outside of Cimaglia made some kicks and missed some kicks to make a prediction. Expect our punting to be drastically less good then last year.

Over all, I think that this is a winnable game for our squad, but I know that I am seeing the world through orange tinted glasses to some extent. The above is a realistic breakdown of our roster, in my opinion - because I wrote it - but I am open to be surprised. We could get smoked with their passing attack, it could be a close gritty game, or we could run roughshod over them. We'll just have to see it between the lines. I hope to be pleasantly surprised by a squad with far more talent then they showed last season when the team understandably quit on Butch Jones.
 
There has been significant back and forth in this thread, and in large part I would attribute much of that to the Tennessee faithful chomping at the bit to see something that isn't the Butch Jones show in eight days. I can't lie, that I am in that group. However, aside from knowing that we have talent and potential on our team, I don't think I'm wrong to say that we really don't know what we have until they strap on the pads and hit the field. We don't know what the offense is going to look like, because none of the players have played in a power running scheme since they hit campus. Our defense has not run a 3-4, and we don't really know how that transition is going to look.

OFFENSE:
On offense, I think we have a good foundation to build upon in the OL. From left to right we can reasonably assume we will see some combination of Trey Smith (LT), Ryan Johnson, Jerome Carvin, Riley Locklear (LG), Brandon Kennedy (C), Johson, Carvin, Locklear (RG), and Drew Richmond, Chance Hall (RT). Now, I have heard reports of Calbert and Marcus Tatum, and I expect both to likely play in the opener.

Behind the line, RB should be a solid group, although the coaches seem to think that Chandler is a bit small - I still think he starts and gets a bulk of the carries. That said, Tim Jordan and Madre London will round out a RB by committee, and the carries may be spread more evenly or they might ride the guy with a hot hand if one emerges.

QB? Much like the RB's, I think that Guarantano starts but that we see Keller Chryst also. I hope that they find a QB and stick with him, but I do not expect that Jeremy Pruitt - of the Saban school - will be extremely forgiving if JG goes out there and lobs a couple interceptions, of which he has thrown several during practices and scrimmages.

And the WR's are a talented bunch that has shown flashes but lacks consistency. Jauan Jennings is a tough as nails player, but he hasn't played a game in almost a calendar year. I love him as a player, and I hope that he gives WVU's defensive backs hell, because we all know that he is a physical blocker that just flat out plays ball. Marquez Callaway can make flashy plays, but outside of the GT game last year, he disappeared in several games. Brandon Johnson is a solid possession guy with relatively sure hands, but he has yet to show that he can hit home runs. Then there is Josh Palmer, who has been lauded in two preseasons now, but his dropped balls last year still make me want to beat my head into the wall.

Then you have the coaching questions on Offense. How will Tyson Helton call a game? We really don't know. I am expecting a 60-40 run to pass ratio, but I have no clue. I think many are of the opinion that we ground and pound and they try to dink and dunk in the passing game. I'll be happy with that, because I think it matches what should be our strength against the weakness of a WVU defense that was no good last year against the run and which is built to stop a pass happy Big 12 conference.

DEFENSE:

Defense is a big question mark as well, though we know that we have some talent at two position groups. Defensive line has solid athletes in the starting rotation, Alexis Johnson, Shy Tuttle, and Kyle Phillips were all highly regarded players coming out of their recruitment. Tuttle was a stud prior to injury, but has been set back for two seasons now. Alexis Johnson was never in really solid shape last season, largely because he didn't get to practice in fall camp last year while he sat out for what was ultimately a dismissed domestic violence charge. And Kyle Phillips was fundamentally sound last year, but has never lived up to his five star billing. Emmitt Gooden should be a plug and play guy at DT, but from his Last Chance U tape, he makes some dumb decisions (I think I counted at least four late hit penalties in just what they showed from their games). Outside of those four, we don't really know what is there...Matthew Butler? Deondre Johnson? Eric Crosby? (I'm not even sure that two of those are still playing DL. WVU has a veteran O-line that is seemingly built to pass block, and I can see our guys having some success against them stopping the run and hopefully harrying Grier to help out our secondary.

Linebacking corps should be where we hang our hat on defense. All three of Bituli, Sapp, and Kirkland are solid starters, and potentially a couple of NFL guys in that mix. They can all run, and have experience. Hopefully we can keep Kirkland healthy throughout the season, but I fully expect him to play in this game. This unit should stuff WVU's run, and hopefully can cover the pass when asked. On the edges, Darrell Taylor is a solid football player who has speed and a nose for the QB. He should find some success rushing the passer, because we anticipate that WVU throws a LOT in this game. I'm still in a wait and see with Kongbo who has in no way lived up to his recruiting rating to this point. Yet again we've been told he looks like Adonis and is ready to make an impact. I'll personally believe it when I see it. Overall, however, the LB should be the strength of the defense.

This brings us to the secondary. Who knows? At Safety, Warrior is a starter on most SEC squads, but behind him Abernathy and Kelly can be liabilities at times. Trevon Flowers has been heralded as a player with potential but he's a freshman. Alontae Taylor is apparently penciled in as a starter at Corner, with Baylen Buchanen on the other side. That is a dearth of experience. I love Taylor's upside, and Buchanen can be solid, I believe, but he's on the shorter side. Then Shamburger playing Nickel is another position change. Now, Jeremy Pruitt is a secondary specialist, and I believe that this unit will be far better coached between him and Terry Fair, however this is the weakness of our defense against the strength of WVU's offense.

On defense, we really have no clue how the team's transition to a 3-4 will go, but I think we have a solid unit solely based upon the coaching upgrade. Will they be keyed in for game 1 against a team that is receiving ALL the hype as having a stellar offense? I don't know, and if we're being honest, none of us do.

I think our special teams units will be lackluster, and I honestly don't know enough outside of Cimaglia made some kicks and missed some kicks to make a prediction. Expect our punting to be drastically less good then last year.

Over all, I think that this is a winnable game for our squad, but I know that I am seeing the world through orange tinted glasses to some extent. The above is a realistic breakdown of our roster, in my opinion - because I wrote it - but I am open to be surprised. We could get smoked with their passing attack, it could be a close gritty game, or we could run roughshod over them. We'll just have to see it between the lines. I hope to be pleasantly surprised by a squad with far more talent then they showed last season when the team understandably quit on Butch Jones.

Solid Post IMO! In short we dont KNOW anything but have the talent to whip some mountaineers :)
 
There has been significant back and forth in this thread, and in large part I would attribute much of that to the Tennessee faithful chomping at the bit to see something that isn't the Butch Jones show in eight days. I can't lie, that I am in that group. However, aside from knowing that we have talent and potential on our team, I don't think I'm wrong to say that we really don't know what we have until they strap on the pads and hit the field. We don't know what the offense is going to look like, because none of the players have played in a power running scheme since they hit campus. Our defense has not run a 3-4, and we don't really know how that transition is going to look.

OFFENSE:
On offense, I think we have a good foundation to build upon in the OL. From left to right we can reasonably assume we will see some combination of Trey Smith (LT), Ryan Johnson, Jerome Carvin, Riley Locklear (LG), Brandon Kennedy (C), Johson, Carvin, Locklear (RG), and Drew Richmond, Chance Hall (RT). Now, I have heard reports of Calbert and Marcus Tatum, and I expect both to likely play in the opener.

Behind the line, RB should be a solid group, although the coaches seem to think that Chandler is a bit small - I still think he starts and gets a bulk of the carries. That said, Tim Jordan and Madre London will round out a RB by committee, and the carries may be spread more evenly or they might ride the guy with a hot hand if one emerges.

QB? Much like the RB's, I think that Guarantano starts but that we see Keller Chryst also. I hope that they find a QB and stick with him, but I do not expect that Jeremy Pruitt - of the Saban school - will be extremely forgiving if JG goes out there and lobs a couple interceptions, of which he has thrown several during practices and scrimmages.

And the WR's are a talented bunch that has shown flashes but lacks consistency. Jauan Jennings is a tough as nails player, but he hasn't played a game in almost a calendar year. I love him as a player, and I hope that he gives WVU's defensive backs hell, because we all know that he is a physical blocker that just flat out plays ball. Marquez Callaway can make flashy plays, but outside of the GT game last year, he disappeared in several games. Brandon Johnson is a solid possession guy with relatively sure hands, but he has yet to show that he can hit home runs. Then there is Josh Palmer, who has been lauded in two preseasons now, but his dropped balls last year still make me want to beat my head into the wall.

Then you have the coaching questions on Offense. How will Tyson Helton call a game? We really don't know. I am expecting a 60-40 run to pass ratio, but I have no clue. I think many are of the opinion that we ground and pound and they try to dink and dunk in the passing game. I'll be happy with that, because I think it matches what should be our strength against the weakness of a WVU defense that was no good last year against the run and which is built to stop a pass happy Big 12 conference.

DEFENSE:

Defense is a big question mark as well, though we know that we have some talent at two position groups. Defensive line has solid athletes in the starting rotation, Alexis Johnson, Shy Tuttle, and Kyle Phillips were all highly regarded players coming out of their recruitment. Tuttle was a stud prior to injury, but has been set back for two seasons now. Alexis Johnson was never in really solid shape last season, largely because he didn't get to practice in fall camp last year while he sat out for what was ultimately a dismissed domestic violence charge. And Kyle Phillips was fundamentally sound last year, but has never lived up to his five star billing. Emmitt Gooden should be a plug and play guy at DT, but from his Last Chance U tape, he makes some dumb decisions (I think I counted at least four late hit penalties in just what they showed from their games). Outside of those four, we don't really know what is there...Matthew Butler? Deondre Johnson? Eric Crosby? (I'm not even sure that two of those are still playing DL. WVU has a veteran O-line that is seemingly built to pass block, and I can see our guys having some success against them stopping the run and hopefully harrying Grier to help out our secondary.

Linebacking corps should be where we hang our hat on defense. All three of Bituli, Sapp, and Kirkland are solid starters, and potentially a couple of NFL guys in that mix. They can all run, and have experience. Hopefully we can keep Kirkland healthy throughout the season, but I fully expect him to play in this game. This unit should stuff WVU's run, and hopefully can cover the pass when asked. On the edges, Darrell Taylor is a solid football player who has speed and a nose for the QB. He should find some success rushing the passer, because we anticipate that WVU throws a LOT in this game. I'm still in a wait and see with Kongbo who has in no way lived up to his recruiting rating to this point. Yet again we've been told he looks like Adonis and is ready to make an impact. I'll personally believe it when I see it. Overall, however, the LB should be the strength of the defense.

This brings us to the secondary. Who knows? At Safety, Warrior is a starter on most SEC squads, but behind him Abernathy and Kelly can be liabilities at times. Trevon Flowers has been heralded as a player with potential but he's a freshman. Alontae Taylor is apparently penciled in as a starter at Corner, with Baylen Buchanen on the other side. That is a dearth of experience. I love Taylor's upside, and Buchanen can be solid, I believe, but he's on the shorter side. Then Shamburger playing Nickel is another position change. Now, Jeremy Pruitt is a secondary specialist, and I believe that this unit will be far better coached between him and Terry Fair, however this is the weakness of our defense against the strength of WVU's offense.

On defense, we really have no clue how the team's transition to a 3-4 will go, but I think we have a solid unit solely based upon the coaching upgrade. Will they be keyed in for game 1 against a team that is receiving ALL the hype as having a stellar offense? I don't know, and if we're being honest, none of us do.

I think our special teams units will be lackluster, and I honestly don't know enough outside of Cimaglia made some kicks and missed some kicks to make a prediction. Expect our punting to be drastically less good then last year.

Over all, I think that this is a winnable game for our squad, but I know that I am seeing the world through orange tinted glasses to some extent. The above is a realistic breakdown of our roster, in my opinion - because I wrote it - but I am open to be surprised. We could get smoked with their passing attack, it could be a close gritty game, or we could run roughshod over them. We'll just have to see it between the lines. I hope to be pleasantly surprised by a squad with far more talent then they showed last season when the team understandably quit on Butch Jones.

Great post, man. I was actually going to ask about Gooden, since he seemed to be a sure signee for WVU, but then flipped to the Vols. And you're right, his LCU appearances didn't really do him too many favors.
 
Advertisement



Back
Top