BigOrange15
Never Falter, Never Yield
- Joined
- Nov 3, 2009
- Messages
- 23,330
- Likes
- 36,897
Www.dn.govLink or STFU.
The only real personell situation issue I have is at QB. I am honest in this. I just do not think KC is a good QB at all, and I don't think he has any potential to mine either. I think the offense is going to look like 2005s with him at QB, only worse.I certainly don't want to go through another season watching that either, but do you really think that this staff went through all those motions to bring in a sub-par QB and are pushing him to be the starter for political reasons?
That would mean you probably don't have too high of an opinion of their overall ability to evaluate talent. Is that fair to say, or are you just having issues with the QB situation? I, for one, am not too high on JG at this point with him going into his third year in college and not being more settled, accurate, and consistent than he is at this point. I would assume both will play and we will see who gets it done when the lights come on...
When teams stack the box every game because they have no respect for the QB it will be 1/2 yard and a pile of isht.I agree. Can't have negative plays. That's why I think they'll go with the better game manager - the lower risk of the two. I think they'll look at 3 yards and a cloud of dust as a good play.
No i don’t. I think our offense is very simple (throw wise) and which QB isn’t all that important.
I think they will wait til the last second to keep wvu guessing.
That's when we go to a controlled passing game. If they stack the box I like our match-ups with our wide receivers against about everybody. That's been our problem the last several years, they didn't have to stack the box to stop the run. They could play a base defense and stop us. Didn't have to take risk of leaving a receiver one on one. I believe that changes this year.When teams stack the box every game because they have no respect for the QB it will be 1/2 yard and a pile of isht.