John Brennan

#201
#201
0nelilreb said:
This whole dumb and dangerous thing , how do you make this connection ? Don’t give me emotional bleeding heart crap . How in hell can you defend an ex intel hack that lied multiple times to congress , voted for communism during the Cold War and is actively employed at a left leaning media outlet ? Please tell me how that’s dumb or dangerous . Smh
Click to expand...
That's different because those were just misunderstandings... No civilians were hit with drone strikes either according to Saint Brennan. Just another misunderstanding.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BigOrangeD, AirVol and 0nelilreb
#203
#203
Grand Vol said:
Tom, I'll wait for you to make the argument that removing a security clearance and access to classified information one can't speak about, by long established law, somehow inhibits freedom of speech.

I'll grab a cup of coffee and watch your mental gymnastics on this one. I'd prefer the argument presented in a lady collegiate gymnast format though. They are far prettier than dudes spinning around on that horse thingy.
Click to expand...
Better make it a really big cup of coffee.
 
#206
#206
TennTom said:
Yeah, all of these experts in our national security apparatus are all clearly wrong and it's the petty, vindictive, inexperienced, pathologically lying clown that's right. Makes sense. Deep State!!
Click to expand...
I think your statement only makes sense to you. Brennan and Clapper are no longer part of out national security apparatus. But while they were part of it, they were pretty busy. Their actions not that of intelligence but petty and vindictive.

Enter Fusion, the DNC and Hillary to pay Steele to use sources inside Russia to create a dossier that was unverifiable. Brennan was responsible for bringing an unverified dossier to Harry Reid the majority leader at the time. Harry Reid then wrote a letter to get the dossier on the FBI's radar. In the meantime that very same dossier was being turned over by John mccain to the fbi, still unverifiable.
The insurance policy set in motion with Comey, strozk, page, McCabe and both ohrs who, with the exception of nellie, worked in that security apparatus. ( nellie worked for fusion.. What a coinkydink)

Post election enter mueller....15 months later....We have no indictment of trump, 19 Russians indicted who will never see the inside of an American courtroom. Manafort and gates were dirty long before this campaign and I hope they get nailed. 302's changed on Flynn. All to get at trump impeached, are you seeing a pattern here?

Did trump get peed on in Russia? I don't know. I would think it would be a true test of courage for a germaphobe to get peed on.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CABVOL, davethevol, Boston Vol and 12 others
#207
#207
NurseGoodVol said:
I think your statement only makes sense to you. Brennan and Clapper are no longer part of out national security apparatus. But while they were part of it, they were pretty busy. Their actions not that of intelligence but petty and vindictive.

Enter Fusion, the DNC and Hillary to pay Steele to use sources inside Russia to create a dossier that was unverifiable. Brennan was responsible for bringing an unverified dossier to Harry Reid the majority leader at the time. Harry Reid then wrote a letter to get the dossier on the FBI's radar. In the meantime that very same dossier was being turned over by John mccain to the fbi, still unverifiable.
The insurance policy set in motion with Comey, strozk, page, McCabe and both ohrs who, with the exception of nellie, worked in that security apparatus. ( nellie worked for fusion.. What a coinkydink)

Post election enter mueller....15 months later....We have no indictment of trump, 19 Russians indicted who will never see the inside of an American courtroom. Manafort and gates were dirty long before this campaign and I hope they get nailed. 302's changed on Flynn. All to get at trump impeached, are you seeing a pattern here?

Did trump get peed on in Russia? I don't know. I would think it would be a true test of courage for a germaphobe to get peed on.
Click to expand...
I like you. Stick around.
 
#214
#214
TennTom said:
"Decisions on security clearances should be based on national security concerns and not political views." There's a reason why this is so unprecedented. Because it's dumb, it's dangerous, and above all it's childishly petty. The fact that you all defend this isn't the least bit shocking though.
Logical fallacy.
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
 
#219
#219
Perhaps it would be better to seek out actual court documents and FOIA releases for information. Information from a " news" source that leant 4 reporters to Hillary's must talk to list for dispersing narratives during the campaign might make the coverage slightly skewed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tennvols77 and SLICKYINC
#223
#223
BigOrangeTrain said:
What makes these people patriots? And how is Trump stifling their free speech? How do they not have the freedom to say whatever they want?
Click to expand...
I think this and other threads disprove that point thouroughly. I keep count, I've been promised 22 times now that the apocolypse is imminent by something trump has done. Yet I wake everyday, the sun rises and sets, go to work, come home and I still don't have my promised apocalypse. I'm going to have a beverage and contemplate why they lie to me like that?
 
  • Like
Reactions: SLICKYINC and SpaceCoastVol
#224
#224
NurseGoodVol said:
A stand down order during beghazi gives him the right to that opinion. Very outspoken critic and rightly so.
Click to expand...

He was also the Saudi Arabia station chief that allowed the 9-11 hijackers passports, even though there were tons of red flags. I'm not comfortable with revoking security clearances for political reasons, but I'm not sure this guy is the one to protest. His record is abysmal and he is very likely a traitor.
 
  • Like
Reactions: davethevol, Rasputin_Vol, AirVol and 1 other person
#225
#225
red butler said:
He was also the Saudi Arabia station chief that allowed the 9-11 hijackers passports, even though there were tons of red flags. I'm not comfortable with revoking security clearances for political reasons, but I'm not sure this guy is the one to protest. His record is abysmal and he is very likely a traitor.
Click to expand...
Traitor? I highly doubt that.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement





Back
Top