volatil
Villains
- Joined
- Dec 12, 2009
- Messages
- 42,084
- Likes
- 100,405
How is that screwing it up? They need to play whoever gives them the best chance to win now. It’s a new system so really we can’t even offer up an educated opinion on who will play/fit better
When Koepka has done what Jack, Tom Watson and Tiger have done, and becomes a "has been", then I'll be cheering for him when he's that close in a major. (Does anyone remember Tom Watson a few years back in the British open? I'm sure Stewart Cink is a nice guy, but only his family members wanted him to win that)Poor Koepka. Never had any danger from a has been, and the crowd gives him nothing when he wins.
Why? Why not play the guy that gives you the best chance to win for the next two or three years? Just seems really short sighted of the staff. Plus i think KC is terrible. JG at least has upside and it sounds like he’s improving.How is that screwing it up? They need to play whoever gives them the best chance to win now. It’s a new system so really we can’t even offer up an educated opinion on who will play/fit better
Why? Why not play the guy that gives you the best chance to win for the next two or three years? Just seems really short sighted of the staff. Plus i think KC is terrible. JG at least has upside and it sounds like he’s improving.
In my eyes, it looks like they’re playing “their guy” instead of the one that’s more talented. Hope it works out but I don’t think it will long term. Our QBs next year will be McBride, shrout, and Maurer.
Because in ONE practice KC got more reps?Why? Why not play the guy that gives you the best chance to win for the next two or three years? Just seems really short sighted of the staff. Plus i think KC is terrible. JG at least has upside and it sounds like he’s improving.
In my eyes, it looks like they’re playing “their guy” instead of the one that’s more talented. Hope it works out but I don’t think it will long term. Our QBs next year will be McBride, shrout, and Maurer.
I've been watching golf since Davis Love III was dominating the circuit. Tiger benefited from weak competition his whole career. Until now. The Young guns don't know the "Tiger affect" and they probably never will.No wonder you keep saying Tiger is a has been...you were too young to see when he dominated the tour for over a decade. Today was just a glimpse of what he used to do consistently for a long long time.
Why? Why not play the guy that gives you the best chance to win for the next two or three years? Just seems really short sighted of the staff. Plus i think KC is terrible. JG at least has upside and it sounds like he’s improving.
In my eyes, it looks like they’re playing “their guy” instead of the one that’s more talented. Hope it works out but I don’t think it will long term. Our QBs next year will be McBride, shrout, and Maurer.
Poor Koepka. Never had any danger from a has been, and the crowd gives him nothing when he wins.
Wouldn’t surprise me if KC put himself ahead with his performance today.
Taylor is a starting CB 100%
Bryce Thompson can play.
We are more than fine at RB and WR.
Whys that? did he manage that much better? is that the attribute the staff is prioritizing?
Had a top notch offensive line and two elite running backs and couldn’t keep his job. You really want me to believe he’s in a better situation to succeed here? I’m not buying that for a minute. I say terrible because if he were mediocre he would probably still be at Stanford.There’s no way you can watch KC play at Stanford and look at his stats and say he’s “terrible”. That’s just not logical. Underwhelming, mediocre fine but come on.
Idk why people are so caught up on the long term. If JG isn’t good enough for the coaches now that they choose to play a 1 year rental over him then it doesn’t matter. We need to win now worse than every. Do you know how hard it is to recruit and create mommentum off a 4-8 year
He will lose you games if he can’t hit deep and intermediate passes. Teams will key in on short passes and try to stuff the runI see KC as a guy that’s not gonna win games for you individually, but he’s not going to lose games for you by making bad decisions. He’s what Pruitt probably wants, a game manager.
Had a top notch offensive line and two elite running backs and couldn’t keep his job. You really want me to believe he’s in a better situation to succeed here? I’m not buying that for a minute. I say terrible because if he were mediocre he would probably still be at Stanford.
And we have a top 15 class with lots of spots so it isn’t that hard. I would rather us have a slow, steady rebuild than risk it all on year one.