- Joined
- Nov 23, 2012
- Messages
- 77,872
- Likes
- 115,697
The natural tendency for forests is to burn. At a certain age for a given tract it has to happen to clear the undergrowth, place nutrients back in the soil, and clear the way for better growth of timber and foliage for wildlife. It also kills many pests and is the best way to combat invasive species.
The options are either let nature run its course (bad idea around populated areas), controlled low-fire burns (perfect unless there is a drought), or allow loggers to select-cut (takes care of the undergrowth that causes fire issues, but causes soil erosion issues and damage to standing timber if not done properly).
There is no one correct solution, everything has a negative. A balanced, thoughtful approach is needed. That typically involves all three that I posted above.
Yeah, tell that to the chowder heads that oppose interference at all. Or the politicians that voted for the Wilderness Protection areas. Because they tend to be the first in line saying "someone needs to do SOMETHING!" when these fires break out in areas they helped "protect" before.

