BowlBrother85
1 star recruit
- Joined
- Sep 18, 2013
- Messages
- 41,971
- Likes
- 36,630
I wish UT had a "primary" rival where it was unquestionable for both sides. In Bama's case, UT is pretty much Vandy to them these days. They have owned the series forver. Same for UF. Bama's main rival is Auburn and UF's is Fl State or UGA. You could argue UT's only "real" rivals are Vandy and KY (weve played UK more than anyone else and youve got the basketball thing too).
You contradict yourself when you say that Tennessee vs Vandy and Kentucky are rivalries but Tennessee vs Alabama is not. The fact is that Tennessee vs Vandy and Kentucky are far more lopsided historically than Tennessee vs Alabama. Kentucky has beaten Tennessee TWICE since 1985 for crying out loud!
... and a rivalry doesn't just develop because a series is close but if that is the one and only criteria, then how is Georgia vs Tennessee not a rivalry? It is the closest series in the SEC with more than 45 series meetings (Tennessee currently holds the series lead at 23-22-2). Tennessee has also won two of the last three meetings. Since 1980, the series is dead even at 15-15. Since the SEC split into two divisions in 1992, the series is 14-12 in Tennessee's favor.
This thread deals with Georgia, and the fact is, that Tennessee has more than held their own with them going back as far as you want to go... and yes, they beat the hell out of us last year... but what about what we did to them in 2009 under Kiffin? Or 2007, when they were pretty good?
Last edited: