Rasputin_Vol
"Slava Ukraina"
- Joined
- Aug 14, 2007
- Messages
- 72,056
- Likes
- 39,847
I'm trying to put myself in the shoes of "reasonable" fear of death or bodily harm. Since it's the brain of the shooter where the decision was made, and that brain was responding to his condition and perception, isn't that where "reasonable" should be judged?
I described the situation he was in. The video shows it. My question per your attribute of "two seconds" in the decision process seems, well, reasonable to expect an answer.
Should the man automatically not be afraid anymore, after being violently assaulted, because he has the expectation that the attacker wouldn't pull a gun after backing away...or after a predetermined time?
First off, some reading for you to make what I'm saying clear:
I had to add that in for the people such as yourself. In one of my earlier posts I specifically mentioned the ADA turning these parking spots into entitlements for what would generally be lazy, overweight sloths... with a handful of truly handicapped people sprinkled in between.
And even if it is the law, do you need citizens or the police wasting their time trying to enforce this?
that entitlement actually comes from private doctors, I guess government ones could do it too, but the vast majority are going to be private individuals. When my dad had a temporary ADA tag he had to prove it with a doctors note before the government issued him a pass.
and the law isn't FOR the lazy, its FOR those who actually need it. the ones that actually can't make it over a curb. Just because it is taken advantage of doesn't invalidate the law itself.
Correct you cannot tell.
True, not all have safeties (such as revolvers, which then has to be cocked).There are internal safeties to prevent non-trigger-pull discharge (e.g., dropping the gun---the gun may have slammed hard against the asphalt and his body weight and forced safety engagement)...Also, there's grip safety which amounts to a "dead man switch" -- if the grip safety is not held down, the trigger is disengaged and the gun won't fire...point is, we don't have all the facts yet.
Absent any visible weapon* would be a component of "reasonable". Otherwise, again, we may as well just start purging and argue "I was scared and assumed the possibility of a weapon" if anybody asks why you shot someone.
*Now maybe if dude reached in his pocket and pulled out a big black cell phone and they guy fired I'd wager that would become part of the discussion.
First off, some reading for you to make what I'm saying clear:
I had to add that in for the people such as yourself. In one of my earlier posts I specifically mentioned the ADA turning these parking spots into entitlements for what would generally be lazy, overweight sloths... with a handful of truly handicapped people sprinkled in between.
And even if it is the law, do you need citizens or the police wasting their time trying to enforce this?
Florida's 'stand your ground' law under scrutiny after father killed over parking spot
Blame to go around everywhere.
1. Too many handicapped spots for a bunch of lazy, overweight sloths
2. Hoodrat displaying typical ghetto head bobbing, gum smacking, attitude over clearly parking in handicapped space
3. Old entitled baby boomer geezer with a gun trying to throw his weight around and Barney Fife a situation
4. Hoodwolf/white knight boyfriend coming out to defend hoodrat's honor and just escalates a verbal confrontation into an assault
This entire country is a dumpster fire. Where is our soul?
and the law isn't FOR the lazy, its FOR those who actually need it. the ones that actually can't make it over a curb. Just because it is taken advantage of doesn't invalidate the law itself.
I didn't say it was "for" the lazy, nor am I suggesting that since it is being taken advantage of, that it invalidates the law.
Let me say it one more time so that you can understand:
It should be a courtesy.
Nothing more. Nothing less. But now, you get entitled individuals like this guy (or likely far less as aggressive as this guy) that feel like they can confront people over an arbitrary parking spot. Or, feel compelled to call the police overy a parking spot.
It's that sort of mentality in this country that hits at the very heart of this entire shooting incident. A parking spot is not worth having laws written for it, nor worthy of police action, nor worthy of confronting people, nor worthy of back talking and chicken necking with a stranger, nor worth losing your life over.
I hope you are talking about the no placard/plate lazy azzhats that feel entitled to take the space from someone who truly needs it and has the state issued docs to park there.
If not, please provide the name of the state DMV that lists lazy and or overweight sloth as meeting the criteria for a handicapped placard/plate.
Most states consider drivers disabled if they:
Dont have full use of one or both arms.
Cant walk a set number of feet without stopping to rest. Some states set this number as low as 50; others, as high as 200.
Cant walk without using a cane, crutch, brace, prosthetic device, wheelchair, or the assistance of another person.
Have a Class III or Class IV cardiac condition, as set by the American Heart Association.
Must have portable oxygen to walk.
Have a visual acuity of 20/200 or less in the better eye with correcting lenses.
Have a visual acuity of 20/200 but with a limited field of vision in which the widest diameter of the visual field subtends an angle of 20 degrees or less.
I didn't say it was "for" the lazy, nor am I suggesting that since it is being taken advantage of, that it invalidates the law.
Let me say it one more time so that you can understand:
It should be a courtesy.
Nothing more. Nothing less. But now, you get entitled individuals like this guy (or likely far less as aggressive as this guy) that feel like they can confront people over an arbitrary parking spot. Or, feel compelled to call the police overy a parking spot.
It's that sort of mentality in this country that hits at the very heart of this entire shooting incident. A parking spot is not worth having laws written for it, nor worthy of police action, nor worthy of confronting people, nor worthy of back talking and chicken necking with a stranger, nor worth losing your life over.
Not sure if it is wrong. It is a minority opinion though. I will say that.