Special counsel Mueller charges 12 Russian intelligence officers with hacking Democra

You really don't see that Trump could have voiced his unequivocal support for our intelligence community and held Russia accountable while also maintaining diplomatic relations?

I see that he could do it behind the scenes far more effectively than creating a soap opera simply for your enjoyment.
 
I see that he could do it behind the scenes far more effectively than creating a soap opera simply for your enjoyment.

If he was going to say anything at all in public, he should have made it clear that he trusted the assessment of his DNI above anyone else on this matter. That's all he really had to say. He didn't have to blast Putin to do that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
So how can “all of our intelligence agencies” validate a hack of a server that they’ve never been allowed to examine first hand? The only entity that’s been allowed to lay hands on the server is Crowdstrike.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
So how can “all of our intelligence agencies” validate a hack of a server that they’ve never been allowed to examine first hand? The only entity that’s been allowed to lay hands on the server is Crowdstrike.

Cmon guys honest question. Did anybody but Crowdstrike get to actually examine the server?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
So how can “all of our intelligence agencies” validate a hack of a server that they’ve never been allowed to examine first hand? The only entity that’s been allowed to lay hands on the server is Crowdstrike.


Its amazing what lengths you guys will go to support trump. Doesn't matter what qualifications the dissenting party have... you sway in the wind with the whims of a child.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people

I’m not aware of any other entity seeing it either.

So if that’s accepted can somebody explain to me how that attack can be validated by our intelligence agencies?

And the indictments recently laid on are based on documents from this hack?

So what is the providence of the information basing the indictments on here then?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
You really don't see that Trump could have voiced his unequivocal support for our intelligence community and held Russia accountable while also maintaining diplomatic relations?

He did support intelligence community. Said Putin gave a strong powerful argument that he’s innocent. Played peacemaker, not politics, in the public presser. Life goes on. Yawn.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
Its amazing what lengths you guys will go to support trump. Doesn't matter what qualifications the dissenting party have... you sway in the wind with the whims of a child.

Are you aware of anybody having access to the servers? Knock off the ad hominem and just focus on the question.

If the server was not directly examined then what is the Providence of any data claimed to come from it?

“Crowdstrike told us this is what they found. Looks legit.”

If that is the stance are you satisfied with that explanation as the basis for indictments?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
Are you aware of anybody having access to the servers? Knock off the ad hominem and just focus on the question.

If the server was not directly examined then what is the Providence of any data claimed to come from it?

“Crowdstrike told us this is what they found. Looks legit.”

If that is the stance are you satisfied with that explanation as the basis for indictments?

One of the key elements at Crowdstrike has an axe to grind with Russia too
 
He did support intelligence community. Said Putin gave a strong powerful argument that he’s innocent. Played peacemaker, not politics, in the public presser. Life goes on. Yawn.

No, he didn't!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

He cast doubt on the conclusion of the IC just like he always does!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
One of the key elements at Crowdstrike has an axe to grind with Russia too

I have no idea if they do or don’t. I’d say it’s moot. Completely irrelevant.

Why is so much being chest pounded on the outrage of this hack when our own cyber people have been denied access to the hardware?

And if that data is a part of the basis for the indictments then they are completely suspect.

Why is this conveniently just ignored.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Did your “!” key jam?

LOL! Nope that was deliberate and you are seeing things that simply aren't there. Trump was casting doubt on the conclusion drawn by his own DNI - Dan Coats. Basically, he placed the credibility of Putin on par with the credibility of Coats. That was some weak a$$ leadership.
 
LOL! Nope that was deliberate and you are seeing things that simply aren't there. Trump was casting doubt on the conclusion drawn by his own DNI - Dan Coats. Basically, he placed the credibility of Putin on par with the credibility of Coats. That was some weak a$$ leadership.

You should have kept that that dildo from the bank lockbox.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
I must admit I don’t fully understand the outrage today. Most of the people who have twisted themselves into a pretzel wouldn’t vote for Trump regardless of what happened today with Russia. What would the reaction have been had Trump told Russia to go eat a bag of d**** and then armed the Ukraine with a missile defense system? I will wait and see what comes from the meeting before I turn into John McCain, who would bomb every country on the Earth if given the chance.
 
I must admit I don’t fully understand the outrage today. Most of the people who have twisted themselves into a pretzel wouldn’t vote for Trump regardless of what happened today with Russia. What would the reaction have been had Trump told Russia to go eat a bag of d**** and then armed the Ukraine with a missile defense system? I will wait and see what comes from the meeting before I turn into John McCain, who would bomb every country on the Earth if given the chance.

I think you are underestimating the amount of this outrage that is coming from the right. Have you ever seen Newt Gingrich be that critical of Trump before? I haven't and Trump made his wife the Ambassador to the Vatican. Gingrich is about as Pro-Trump as you get on television these days.

Finally, Trump didn't have to tell Putin to eat a bag of d****. All he had to say was that he completely trusted the assessment of his DNI, Dan Coats. Instead, he made it sound like he believed Putin's denial.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Advertisement

Back
Top