BowlBrother85
1 star recruit
- Joined
- Sep 18, 2013
- Messages
- 46,816
- Likes
- 41,503
Let me ask you out of control mouthbreathers a couple of questions...
1. What did you expect Trump to say while on the podium with Putin? Call him a liar in front of the world media? Go over and punch him in the face?
Possibly say what he said and deal with it when he gets home and consults with his Cabinet?
2. Why are you ignoring the fact Putin stated he would allow questioning of the 12 under indictment? Even if it's an empty promise, we still have to follow through with said avenue. The ball will be in Mueller's court over that one.
3. Anything else you'd like to whine about before the day is over?
And "innocent" doesn't mean "didn't do it". Just as our intelligence community concluded at Nuremberg that the Nazi hierarchy was guilty of crimes against humanity but couldn't stand trial for it (they were dead except for Goerring) ... our intelligence community has also concluded that Russia interfered in the 2016 election.
Your defense of this is tribalism in it's purest form. Trump took the stance that Russia didn't interfere and you have a need to defend that stance regardless of anything else.
"Our investigation is still ongoing. We will work with the Russian government, as well as domestic and our allies' agencies, in this matter. We will not tolerate any interference in our political process."
Something to that effect, in his own speaking manner of course.
He's getting roasted by Republicans in Congress and even Fox News. Honestly it was one of his better press conferences on the whole, but he really screwed up throwing our IC under the bus. And it just further feeds the narrative that Trump is about Trump, not his country.
As I said today and many times before, I have GREAT confidence in MY intelligence people. However, I also recognize that in order to build a brighter future, we cannot exclusively focus on the past as the worlds two largest nuclear powers, we must get along! #HELSINKI2018
-- Donald Trump
Putin could not have said it better himself.
As I said today and many times before, I have GREAT confidence in MY intelligence people. However, I also recognize that in order to build a brighter future, we cannot exclusively focus on the past as the worlds two largest nuclear powers, we must get along! #HELSINKI2018
-- Donald Trump
Putin could not have said it better himself.
I used to think you had a modicum of intellectual honesty to you. But now you are falling into line with the rest of the Trump defenders-at-all costs.
Does this not bother you? Are alarm bells not going off for you here? You think this is some sort of grand diplomatic strategy? Come on, you know better. Don't be ashamed to admit this is exactly what it appears to be -- Putin owns Trump.
The last indictments mueller filed, the folks showed up and he looked like a idiot.
Yes. I can see it happening again.
Another domino falls ......
US charges Russian national with being a foreign agent - CNNPolitics
Inching ever closer to Trump.
Mueller made it a lot worse this time. To prove his new stuff would require outing intelligence sources; we've deliberately not prosecuted known spies in the past to prevent that. Just the fact that he's made the claim tells Russia and everyone else that we've penetrated their system and they need to correct it. We were successful in WW2 by having hacked the German and Japanese coding systems and keeping them from knowing it while we reaped the rewards. Mueller is the one Trump should be having for lunch because Mueller just gave Russia the playbook.
A month before Donald Trump clinched the Republican nomination, one of his closest allies in Congress House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy made a politically explosive assertion in a private conversation on Capitol Hill with his fellow GOP leaders: that Trump could be the beneficiary of payments from Russian President Vladimir Putin. Theres two people I think Putin pays: Rohrabacher and Trump, McCarthy (R-Calif.) said, according to a recording of the June 15, 2016, exchange, which was listened to and verified by The Washington Post. Rep. Dana Rohrabacher is a Californian Republican known in Congress as a fervent defender of Putin and Russia.
House Speaker Paul D. Ryan (R-Wis.) immediately interjected, stopping the conversation from further exploring McCarthys assertion, and swore the Republicans present to secrecy.
Before the conversation, McCarthy and Ryan had emerged from separate talks at the Capitol with Ukrainian Prime Minister Vladi*mir Groysman, who had described a Kremlin tactic of financing populist politicians to undercut Eastern European democratic institutions.
News had just broken the day before in The Washington Post that Russian government hackers had penetrated the computer network of the Democratic National Committee, prompting McCarthy to shift the conversation from Russian meddling in Europe to events closer to home.
Some of the lawmakers laughed at McCarthys comment. Then McCarthy quickly added: Swear to God.
Ryan instructed his Republican lieutenants to keep the conversation private, saying: No leaks. . . . This is how we know were a real family here.
No he did not, nor was that his intent.
He said he had confidence in Coates, as well as his intelligence people.
Mueller made it a lot worse this time. To prove his new stuff would require outing intelligence sources; we've deliberately not prosecuted known spies in the past to prevent that. Just the fact that he's made the claim tells Russia and everyone else that we've penetrated their system and they need to correct it. We were successful in WW2 by having hacked the German and Japanese coding systems and keeping them from knowing it while we reaped the rewards. Mueller is the one Trump should be having for lunch because Mueller just gave Russia the playbook.
Aren't you part of the context party. He love Wikileaks for making the Dims look stupid while he campaigned against the Dims. Do try and make the light bulb come on and see the connection.
You say that just as you ignored the context of that post you quoted. I was responding to another poster who asked what good the hacking of the DNC could do for Trump's campaign. It gave him ammunition to use against Hillary Clinton at his campaign rallies, obviously.
Obviously... it didnt work. Did it? She won the popular vote. Correct?
Yes, he did.
"All I can do is ask the question - my people came to me, Dan Coats came to me and some others, they said they think it's Russia. I have President Putin he just said it's not Russia. I will say this, I don't see any reason why it would be but I really want to see the server but, I have confidence in both parties." He later called Putin's denial of meddling "extremely strong and powerful" - Donald J. Trump (July 16, 2018 in Helsinki, Finland while standing next to Vladimir Putin)
He clearly took Putin's word over that of Dan Coats. He said as much today.
You say that just as you ignored the context of that post you quoted. I was responding to another poster who asked what good the hacking of the DNC could do for Trump's campaign. It gave him ammunition to use against Hillary Clinton at his campaign rallies, obviously.