FBI Trump-hater Strozk to testify publicly

#252
#252
BowlBrother85 said:
Then name one action (not just a text) that Strzok took to follow through on his bias.
Click to expand...
Well obviously I can't Einstein. That is why this whole thing is a huge nothing but waste of time. The Dimwits have closed ranks and are gonna protect him. Just like he and others protected Hillary. He was a good soldier.

Ruined the FBI for awhile.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#253
#253
BowlBrother85 said:
Who had been investigating Carter Page for quite some time. "Spygate" never gained traction because there was never anything to it.

Once again, what action did Strzok take to hurt Trump?
Click to expand...

He was a high-ranking official in the FBI, who intentionally prioritized investigating members of the Trump campaign over the Weiner laptop with the damning Hillary emails. So, there was definite intent to harm Trump here, and it ended up actually backfiring in Trump's favor, which is absolutely hilarious!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#254
#254
zeppelin128 said:
So, as usual, you ignore anything that speaks badly toward your party and try to turn it around on others, when you were likely screeming any time Obama said hello.

You want to lecture Democrats on morality when your party and President supported a pedophile rapist in Alabama?


You are the biggest partisan, hypocritical shill on this board.
Click to expand...
No I think eviLG has that title.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#255
#255
zeppelin128 said:
So, as usual, you ignore anything that speaks badly toward your party and try to turn it around on others, when you were likely screeming any time Obama said hello.

You want to lecture Democrats on morality when your party and President supported a pedophile rapist in Alabama?


You are the biggest partisan, hypocritical shill on this board.
Click to expand...

"Allegedly". By the way what ever happened with that?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#257
#257
zeppelin128 said:
So, as usual, you ignore anything that speaks badly toward your party and try to turn it around on others, when you were likely screeming any time Obama said hello.

You want to lecture Democrats on morality when your party and President supported a pedophile rapist in Alabama?


You are the biggest partisan, hypocritical shill on this board.
Click to expand...


You don’t know your d**k from a toothpick.

I spend my time here chapping the ass of loons, like yourself. See above.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#258
#258
BowlBrother85 said:
But he didn't do much anyway. As I have pointed out many times, Mueller removed him from the special counsel's investigation a year ago, as soon as he became aware of the texts.
Click to expand...

And that was too late. Due to the timeline it’s all forever tainted and questionable. Strzok’s own hubris flushed it all down the toilet bowl. I’ll never accept the investigation wasn’t tainted regardless of what you say. And you’ll never accept it was tainted. Regardless the doubt has been firmly planted and that attacks the credibility of any result.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#259
#259
Matt2496 said:
He was a high-ranking official in the FBI, who intentionally prioritized investigating members of the Trump campaign over the Weiner laptop with the damning Hillary emails. So, there was definite intent to harm Trump here, and it ended up actually backfiring in Trump's favor, which is absolutely hilarious!
Click to expand...

That is just wrong. Strzok is on record agreeing with Comey's decision to publicly announce the reopening of the investigation into Hillary Clinton e-mails just 9 days before the election following the discovery of the Weiner laptop. Trump applauded this decision. It definitely helped him. To this day, Hillary thinks that is why she lost - not sure I agree with that but...
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#260
#260
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#261
#261
NorthDallas40 said:
And that was too late. Due to the timeline it’s all forever tainted and questionable. Strzok’s own hubris flushed it all down the toilet bowl. I’ll never accept the investigation wasn’t tainted regardless of what you say. And you’ll never accept it was tainted. Regardless the doubt has been firmly planted and that attacks the credibility of any result.
Click to expand...

People will believe what they want and figure out reasons to justify it later; if they feel the need to.... if that's what you're trying to say.
 
#262
#262
Squints said:
You don’t know your d**k from a toothpick.

I spend my time here chapping the ass of loons, like yourself. See above.
Click to expand...

You spend most of your time insulting people. Granted, I've done that before, but not in every single post, and I was man enough to apologize when I insulted someone.

We get it, you hate anyone outside of your narrow, foolish worldview. You model yourself after Trump. Party above country, narcissistic, bigly snowflake, and a pathological liar. Instead of actually debating things, you resort to adolescent insults for cheap likes. Stroke that ego, just like your daddy Trump.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#263
#263
BowlBrother85 said:
That is just wrong. Strzok is on record agreeing with Comey's decision to publicly announce the reopening of the investigation into Hillary Clinton e-mails just 9 days before the election following the discovery of the Weiner laptop. Trump applauded this decision. It definitely helped him. To this day, Hillary thinks that is why she lost - not sure I agree with that but...
Click to expand...

Did you pull this out of your ass? Because I'm reading the IG report's section on Comey's public statement right now and I see nothing about Strzok influencing Comey's decisions.

If anything, everyone around Comey were advising him not to come forward with this revelation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#264
#264
zeppelin128 said:
You spend most of your time insulting people. Granted, I've done that before, but not in every single post, and I was man enough to apologize when I insulted someone.

We get it, you hate anyone outside of your narrow, foolish worldview. You model yourself after Trump. Party above country, narcissistic, bigly snowflake, and a pathological liar. Instead of actually debating things, you resort to adolescent insults for cheap likes. Stroke that ego, just like your daddy Trump.
Click to expand...

Nope, I’ve tried several times to be amicable with you and you refused.

You want to act a punk, I will treat you as such. I don’t give a damn if we’re geographically similar in upbringing or not, you’re a socialist, **** talking mouth breather.

I have no respect for a kid who spins more than a record. If you don’t like that, STHU and keep stepping.

I used to pity kids like you; I now laugh.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people
#265
#265
zeppelin128 said:
No one has ever, ever, ever, said anything bad about their boss or future boss, but then proceeded to do their job professionally regardless.
Click to expand...

I think you miss the point. Strzok was/is an FBI agent. He should never have engaged in activities that put him in this position. His obvious bias tainted everything he touched. You can argue how it effected the overall investigation, but there really isn't an argument that his involvement creates a question of impropriety. This isn't like any other job. This is the highest law enforcement bureau in the land, and he engaged in highly questionable actions. And he wasn't the only one.

I'm not saying this makes Trump innocent. I question that whole investigation for other reasons, but even Dems should be outraged at these texts. Supporting him makes them look shady as hell because his words and his bias speak for themselves. IF Trump is guilty, they shouldn't want anything tainting this investigation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 6 people
#266
#266
Weezer said:
I think you miss the point. Strzok was/is an FBI agent. He should never have engaged in activities that put him in this position. His obvious bias tainted everything he touched. You can argue how it effected the overall investigation, but there really isn't an argument that his involvement creates a question of impropriety. This isn't like any other job. This is the highest law enforcement bureau in the land, and he engaged in highly questionable actions. And he wasn't the only one.

I'm not saying this makes Trump innocent. I question that whole investigation for other reasons, but even Dems should be outraged at these texts. Supporting him makes them look shady as hell because his words and his bias speak for themselves. IF Trump is guilty, they shouldn't want anything tainting this investigation.
Click to expand...

So no person in government can have an opinion? This is essentially what you are saying.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#267
#267
Matt2496 said:
Did you pull this out of your ass? Because I'm reading the IG report's section on Comey's public statement right now and I see nothing about Strzok influencing Comey's decisions.

If anything, everyone around Comey were advising him not to come forward with this revelation.
Click to expand...

Peter Strzok co-wrote the initial draft of the Comey letter that re-opened the Clinton e-mail probe. This letter formed the basis of what Comey sent to Congress, supporting the reopening of the investigation once the e-mails were discovered on Weiner's laptop.

I can't provide a link but just Google "Strzok Drafted Comey Letter" and you will find links to both CNN and Fox News in the first two links. That should make it clear enough that Strzok's actions were not biased. He helped Trump win the election with that letter.
 
Last edited:
#269
#269
1972 Grad said:
It's what he does. That's why I don't engage with him, other than to congratulate him on being the #1 sh!t stirrer on the forum.
Click to expand...

You don't engage me because you get tired of having to pull my foot out of your ass.

Old man.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#270
#270
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#273
#273
zeppelin128 said:
So no person in government can have an opinion? This is essentially what you are saying.
Click to expand...

Suppose a judge was in the klan and he was presiding over the trial of a black man. During the trial, he sent messages to his paramour about how he despised the man on trial.

I'm sure you'd never accept his explanation that he never acted on his bias in his professional duties.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5 people
#274
#274
I agree w this. If he’s cheating w Lisa Page I can’t imagine what his wife looks like...
[twitter]1007995918279413760[/twitter]
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people
#275
#275
zeppelin128 said:
So no person in government can have an opinion? This is essentially what you are saying.
Click to expand...

I'm saying no one in a position of investigating politicians should make their opinions so public. He sent the texts on his FBI phone. Not very intelligent. And what he said went beyond a simple opinion. He implied he was ready to take action. This is no where near as simple as you would like it to be.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement





Back
Top