Please let this be true!

#26
#26
I think Septic just likes arguing and trolling the hell out of people on here by saying outlandish things even he doesn't believe. I'm sure he giggles when he gets a rise out of some folks on here.

That's just the way he is.

So in other words, his username is full of shat?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#28
#28

This is much more like what Fox News wants to happen rather than something that actually will. If I had to guess right now, I would say that Michael Bloomberg will be the Democratic party nominee in 2020. He is far from what the Democratic establishment considers ideal but they want to win and he matches up well with Trump in most categories in which Trump likes to boast... Things can change though. We are still a year away from having a good idea of who all will be in the race.

The future leadership of the DNC has been discussed in this thread as well, the House is very murky but I would bet money that either Kamala Harris or Corey Booker succeeds Chuck Schumer in the Senate.
 
#29
#29
This is much more like what Fox News wants to happen rather than something that actually will. If I had to guess right now, I would say that Michael Bloomberg will be the Democratic party nominee in 2020. He is far from what the Democratic establishment considers ideal but they want to win and he matches up well with Trump in most categories in which Trump likes to boast... Things can change though. We are still a year away from having a good idea of who all will be in the race.

The future leadership of the DNC has been discussed in this thread as well, the House is very murky but I would bet money that either Kamala Harris or Corey Booker succeeds Chuck Schumer in the Senate.

So you believe that going more extreme is best for Dems?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#34
#34
That is oversimplifying. You guys do this a lot.

Not for Dems. Identity politics is all you guys care about. Demographics drive everything.

Feelings over facts.

Like this..

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/black-female-leaders-blast-schumer-pelosi-failing-defend/story?id=56382314

https://www.google.com/amp/s/abcnews.go.com/amp/Politics/black-female-leaders-blast-schumer-pelosi-failing-defend/story%3fid=56382314

The dumb ***** called to have conservatives targeted for harassment in their every day lives. Restaurants, gas stations, you name it. Harass, harass, harass. Now Dem party leaders are getting crap from other Dems. Why? Because she’s black. Disregard what Maxine had said. The repubs has “unwarranted attacks”. Look the other way. She’s black and that’s all that matters.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 5 people
#35
#35
I think Septic just likes arguing and trolling the hell out of people on here by saying outlandish things even he doesn't believe. I'm sure he giggles when he gets a rise out of some folks on here.

That's just the way he is.

giphy.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#37
#37
Not really.


Yes, completely.



Its been said here countless times, including by Republicans, that they did not vote FOR Trump, they just voted AGAINST Clinton.


Quit pretending like the Dems are the only ones that vote against people, as opposed to for them. Very few Republicans I know actually like Trump. Most are worried every day that he will embarrass them even more by further stupidity.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5 people
#40
#40
Yes, completely.

Its been said here countless times, including by Republicans, that they did not vote FOR Trump, they just voted AGAINST Clinton.

Quit pretending like the Dems are the only ones that vote against people, as opposed to for them. Very few Republicans I know actually like Trump. Most are worried every day that he will embarrass them even more by further stupidity.

Yes, quite a few people voted against Hillary rather than for Trump.

However, I'd say more voted for him because he had a message and a platform (even if he hasn't completely stuck to it yet) instead of "just gonna continue what the other guy did."

Que the "racist, homophobic, misogynist, etc" comments at this point. Don't let me down, LG.

Regardless, I'd dare say a lot of centrist Democrats will even admit they don't have a clue what her platform was. Nor do they have the first clue what the DNC is running on in 2018 other than "because we aren't Trump."
 
#42
#42
Yes, completely.



Its been said here countless times, including by Republicans, that they did not vote FOR Trump, they just voted AGAINST Clinton.


Quit pretending like the Dems are the only ones that vote against people, as opposed to for them. Very few Republicans I know actually like Trump. Most are worried every day that he will embarrass them even more by further stupidity.

That's weird because all the Republicans I know love Trump and view him as the most conservative President since Reagan.

Plus, the #neverTrump movement started by Republicans (during the primaries) was an utter failure anyway. If so many Republicans hate Trump, how did he win the Republican primaries in overwhelming fashion?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#45
#45
Who will be the first demorat to say they are running for president? Any guesses?

Bloomberg isn't pouring $80 million of his own money into Democratic campaigns all over the country right now just for the hell of it ... He is going to run and he wants a Democratic majority in the House when he does it.

... and unlike Trump; Bloomberg really is liquid enough to self fund his own Presidential campaign and he will follow through on doing it.
 
#47
#47
Please, Baby Jesus, let her run...again.

On one side the "Mute" button does wonders for the screech, but it's pretty much impossible to judge when the video is coming or gone to avoid having to see the hag ... again and again and again. Why do dims pick such incredibly offensive "human" beings that a lobotomy seems like a rational option?
 
#49
#49
Thank you.

It’s a checklist.

Democrat nominee requirements for 2020:

Not white
Cant open a jar of pickles
Does pushups on knees
Extensive barista experieince
Does not have public seizures
Does not talk like a robot
More insane than sane
Doesnt pass out in 70 degree weather
Gender fluid
Pseudo communist
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#50
#50
Let her run!
Let her run!

Why is this so important to you guys? You are acting like it's a sure thing that Hillary Clinton would even get the party nomination in the unlikely event that she ran. What happened to her the one time she faced stiff competition in the Democratic primary? It was in 2008, and she lost badly to Barack Obama. The only recent precedent (and I'm only going back to 1960 when I say "recent") for a failed party nominee garnering a party nomination for a 2nd time is Richard Nixon and he was much younger in 1968 than Hillary Clinton will be in 2020 and far more popular in his party at the time as well.
 

VN Store



Back
Top