TrumpPutingate III: the beginning of the end

#8,851
#8,851
15578962_604106673118669_1687120535790745364_n.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people
#8,853
#8,853
The Trump Crime Syndicate is being investigated by Mueller and Trumplicans heads explode because they cannot accept that reality.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#8,855
#8,855
lawgator1 said:
They know it's true. They are just in massive denial.
Click to expand...

I've never been a fan of Trump. I make no special pleas on his behalf.

All of this TrumPutin fantasy was started because Hillary lost. It's no more complicated than that.

That you've taken the bait just demonstrates how dumb you are.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 9 people
#8,859
#8,859
#8,860
#8,860
ajvol01 said:
Reddit, huh?

You have no idea what is happening.

Better prepare yourself - it's not going to be pleasant.

It all starts with the IG report on Thursday.
Click to expand...

Ok buddy. Can't wait.

From everything I've read, the IG report will be tough on Comey, but not in a way that's favorable to Trump. It'll basically show him breaking with FBI protocol, but not in ways that assisted Hillary. Just another case of blue balls for you guys who lap up every kooky, right-wing conspiracy theory that Gateway pundit (and now Reddit) serves up.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#8,864
#8,864
evillawyer said:
This should give vol0725 hope. Try hard enough and you too can get your conspiracy theory into the mouth of Trump himself. Hilarious. From a Reddit thread to Trump.

'Oconus lures': Evolution of a conspiracy theory, from Reddit to the White House - ABC News
Click to expand...

Lol ABC may be the fakest of fake news. First in that article they called trumps claim unsubstantiated. Then a few paragraphs lower they talk about the timeline of the informants deployment.

Lol which is it abc?
 

Attachments

  • 88B9A815-74C4-4118-A5E7-89974E66B423.jpeg
    88B9A815-74C4-4118-A5E7-89974E66B423.jpeg
    115.1 KB · Views: 1
  • BCFD9A70-657F-437C-9A73-3DBB7D8533DF.jpeg
    BCFD9A70-657F-437C-9A73-3DBB7D8533DF.jpeg
    96.9 KB · Views: 0
#8,865
#8,865
Politico reports that Trump usually rips up papers when he’s done with them, and tosses them in the trash or on the floor – a process some people described as his “filing system.” This does not jibe with the Presidential Records Act, which stipulates that basically every piece of paper the president touches must be shipped off to the National Archives to be preserved for posterity. But instead of saying “Mr. President, you need to stop tearing up these documents because it’s illegal, and also deeply weird,” White House staffers decided it was easier to collect the scraps of paper and have a whole team of government employees tape them back together.

Trump Loves Tearing Papers, Staffers Tape Them Back Together

Would it be better for national security to preserve documents and emails or to destroy them if they contain sensitive information?
 
#8,866
#8,866
Mick said:
Politico reports that Trump usually rips up papers when he’s done with them, and tosses them in the trash or on the floor – a process some people described as his “filing system.” This does not jibe with the Presidential Records Act, which stipulates that basically every piece of paper the president touches must be shipped off to the National Archives to be preserved for posterity. But instead of saying “Mr. President, you need to stop tearing up these documents because it’s illegal, and also deeply weird,” White House staffers decided it was easier to collect the scraps of paper and have a whole team of government employees tape them back together.

Trump Loves Tearing Papers, Staffers Tape Them Back Together

Would it be better for national security to preserve documents and emails or to destroy them if they contain sensitive information?
Click to expand...

I guess its still better that violating a law you signed by intentionally destroying documents and records by the 10s of thousands.

Crisis at the National Archives | RealClearPolitics
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#8,867
#8,867
evillawyer said:
Ok buddy. Can't wait.

From everything I've read, the IG report will be tough on Comey, but not in a way that's favorable to Trump. It'll basically show him breaking with FBI protocol, but not in ways that assisted Hillary. Just another case of blue balls for you guys who lap up every kooky, right-wing conspiracy theory that Gateway pundit (and now Reddit) serves up.
Click to expand...

But shows the firing was justified so no obstruction.

So to being you up to speed
No collusion
No obstruction

What else you got?
 
#8,869
#8,869
Mick said:
You do know globalist are a bunch of rich fers, right? How much do you think Putin is worth? A buck fifty?
Click to expand...

another episode of political gymnastics. I do so love seeing the sides swap on that term "globalist".

its a fine and dandy word when Obama is promising to be more flexible and gives out reset buttons and gives pieces of countries to Russia. But when Trump talks good about Russia suddenly its a bad word.
 
#8,870
#8,870
Mick said:
Decent article that completely left out George W. admins rampant destruction of emails.
Click to expand...

and George Washington throwing away some fan mail.

seems like the staff is taking care of the problem. waste of everyone's time. but that's what the government is for.
 
#8,872
#8,872
hog88 said:
What does GB have to do with Obama violating a law he signed?
Click to expand...

Don't you find it noteworthy that HRC was not Sec. of State when the bill was signed therefore is not guilty of a crime and what is claimed by you that Obama destroyed?

And about GW those emails were also under the 1950 Federal Records Act.
 
Last edited:
#8,873
#8,873
Mick said:
Don't you find it noteworthy that HRC was not Sec. of State when the bill was signed therefore is not guilty of a crime and what is claimed by you that Obama destroyed?

And about GW those emails were also under the 1950 Federal Records Act.
Click to expand...

Point to where I mentioned Hillary.

You're a wee bit defensive this morning.
 
#8,874
#8,874
volfanjustin said:
But shows the firing was justified so no obstruction.

So to being you up to speed
No collusion
No obstruction

What else you got?
Click to expand...

The obstruction inquiry will focus on Trump's intent. It certainly helps his case if there was an objectively valid basis to fire Comey, but the real question still is what intent motivated the firing. And there's lots of evidence that Trump acted with a corrupt intent. You should also realize that the IG report may rely on facts that Trump was not privy to at the time he fired Comey. Thus, he can't invoke those facts to show his motive was pure.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#8,875
#8,875
hog88 said:
Point to where I mentioned Hillary.

You're a wee bit defensive this morning.
Click to expand...

You are the one defensive. I asked if you if it was "noteworthy" that she was not SOS at that time. You make claims that Obama didn't follow the law but offer nothing but that accusation.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top