TrumpPutingate III: the beginning of the end

#8,702
#8,702
evillawyer said:
Seems like a good way to get corruption out of political campaigns. Make them "no go" zones for law enforcement.
Click to expand...

Dan is a bigger loser than Hillary.

He was the Republican Party nominee for Maryland's 6th Congressional District in the 2014 elections, which he lost to Democratic incumbent John Delaney. Bongino was also the Republican Party nominee in Maryland's 2012 election for the United States Senate, which he lost to incumbent Democrat Ben Cardin. He was a primary candidate for Florida's 19th congressional district in 2016, placing third in the Republican primary
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#8,703
#8,703
volinbham said:
left out this quote
Click to expand...




Yes. At the time it had nothing to do with Trump.


Now?



You bet it does!!


Trump administration =


200w.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#8,704
#8,704
Mick said:
Dan is a bigger loser than Hillary.

He was the Republican Party nominee for Maryland's 6th Congressional District in the 2014 elections, which he lost to Democratic incumbent John Delaney. Bongino was also the Republican Party nominee in Maryland's 2012 election for the United States Senate, which he lost to incumbent Democrat Ben Cardin. He was a primary candidate for Florida's 19th congressional district in 2016, placing third in the Republican primary
Click to expand...

I don’t offten agree with you Mick but on this I do. Bongino is a clown who tries to deal in half truths. He is not to be taken seriously. I feel bad for those who lap him up. Just as much as I do those who think there is some real link between trump and russia
 
#8,705
#8,705
volfanhill said:
I don’t offten agree with you Mick but on this I do. Bongino is a clown who tries to deal in half truths. He is not to be taken seriously. I feel bad for those who lap him up. Just as much as I do those who think there is some real link between trump and russia
Click to expand...

That's fair. One day we may agree on the Trump/Russia thing one way or the other.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#8,708
#8,708
Mick said:
Helpful how? They wouldn't have been running around screaming foul.
Click to expand...

I don't know. Maybe he was saying that The info they gave him shouldn't have been held back the way it was. Maybe he thought it would be better for the country if they would have had a reason to not run around screaming foul. Your guess is as good as mine.
 
#8,710
#8,710
Mick said:
Dan is a bigger loser than Hillary.

He was the Republican Party nominee for Maryland's 6th Congressional District in the 2014 elections, which he lost to Democratic incumbent John Delaney. Bongino was also the Republican Party nominee in Maryland's 2012 election for the United States Senate, which he lost to incumbent Democrat Ben Cardin. He was a primary candidate for Florida's 19th congressional district in 2016, placing third in the Republican primary
Click to expand...

Wrong. Hillary's legacy is going to be right up there with Napoleons defeat at Waterloo sans Napoleons previous actual success.
 
#8,711
#8,711
FLVOL_79 said:
Wrong. Hillary's legacy is going to be right up there with Napoleons defeat at Waterloo sans Napoleons previous actual success.
Click to expand...

I was talking about elections lost but you are right Dan Bongino will not be remembered in the history books. Your grandchildren can learn all about the election of the biggest con in recorded history and how it lead to collapse of civilized American society.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#8,712
#8,712
Mick said:
I was talking about elections lost but you are right Dan Bongino will not be remembered in the history books. Your grandchildren can learn all about the election of the biggest con in recorded history and how it lead to collapse of civilized American society.
Click to expand...

Hillary didn't win if you haven't heard?
 
#8,713
#8,713
volfanjustin said:
So its changed in the last week?
Click to expand...




In full context he's saying, at least in that comment, that the initial informant contacts were designed to determine if the Russians were working some of those campaign officials, but not Trump.


A bit later, information came in from many, many sources that in fact Trump, himself, his family, and certainly high up campaign officials, were in contact with the Russians, some apparently benefiting financially from that.


We know that Manafort in particular was. Looks like Flynn was under their spell, too. The first question is to what extent they had their hooks into Trump or those so close to him he knew about it. The next question is whether it was a basis for interfering in the election. The next question is whether there is something else, i.e. blackmail of Trump, at issue. And the final question is whether, aware that these things were issues, Trump took steps to prevent investigation of it.


Frankly, the last one I think is pretty much established by the Lester Holt interview. But I know that no matter what you will never accept any of it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#8,714
#8,714
lawgator1 said:
And the final question is whether, aware that these things were issues, Trump took steps to prevent investigation of it.


Frankly, the last one I think is pretty much established by the Lester Holt interview. But I know that no matter what you will never accept any of it.
Click to expand...

Yep, Trump is culpable. Lock his ass up and award Lester Holt the Presidential Medal of Freedom for liberating our country from the fascist regime known as Trump.

You could go around like this, but it appears it is already occupied....

QC-856.jpg
 
#8,715
#8,715
lawgator1 said:
In full context he's saying, at least in that comment, that the initial informant contacts were designed to determine if the Russians were working some of those campaign officials, but not Trump.


A bit later, information came in from many, many sources that in fact Trump, himself, his family, and certainly high up campaign officials, were in contact with the Russians, some apparently benefiting financially from that.


We know that Manafort in particular was. Looks like Flynn was under their spell, too. The first question is to what extent they had their hooks into Trump or those so close to him he knew about it. The next question is whether it was a basis for interfering in the election. The next question is whether there is something else, i.e. blackmail of Trump, at issue. And the final question is whether, aware that these things were issues, Trump took steps to prevent investigation of it.


Frankly, the last one I think is pretty much established by the Lester Holt interview. But I know that no matter what you will never accept any of it.
Click to expand...

You are right I don’t accept your liberal fairytale but I will give you the rest of Gowdys statement since you all keep overlooking it.

“As of now President Trump is not the focus of the investigation”

Also now obstruction has went out of the window with the report saying Comey went rouge, his firing is now proved to be justified.
 
#8,717
#8,717
volfanjustin said:
You are right I don’t accept your liberal fairytale but I will give you the rest of Gowdys statement since you all keep overlooking it.

“As of now President Trump is not the focus of the investigation”

Also now obstruction has went out of the window with the report saying Comey went rouge, his firing is now proved to be justified.
Click to expand...


Why the qualifier?
 
#8,720
#8,720
Department of Justice and FBI officials are planning another secret briefing for congressional leaders about investigators' use of confidential sources in the early stages of the Russia investigation.

Officials are expected to meet early next week with the leaders of the full House and Senate and the chambers' intelligence committees — the "Gang of Eight" — a senior Justice Department official said.

Feds, DOJ Prepare 3rd Secret Briefing On Confidential Sources For Hill Bosses : NPR
 
#8,722
#8,722
The special counsel’s accusation this week that Paul Manafort, President Trump’s former campaign chairman, tried to tamper with potential witnesses originated with two veteran journalists who turned on Mr. Manafort after working closely with him to prop up the former Russia-aligned president of Ukraine, interviews and documents show.

The two journalists, who helped lead a project to which prosecutors say Mr. Manafort funneled more than $2 million from overseas accounts, are the latest in a series of onetime Manafort business partners who have provided damaging evidence to Robert S. Mueller III, the special counsel investigating Russian meddling in the 2016 election. Their cooperation with the government has increasingly isolated Mr. Manafort as he awaits trial on charges of violating financial, tax and federal lobbying disclosure laws.

With Mueller Closing In, Manafort’s Allies Abandon Him - The New York Times
 
#8,725
#8,725
Obviously, Romney isn't following luther's countdown.

Romney predicts a Trump win in 2020 | Fox News

Mitt Romney addressed a closed-door tech summit in Utah on Thursday, telling the room he thinks President Donald Trump -- the man he once called a “phony” and a “fraud” -- will “solidly” win re-election in 2020, reports said.

Romney, a former Massachusetts governor, now running for a U.S. Senate seat in Utah, told a group of GOP donors that Trump will “easily” be the party’s nominee and go on to beat his Democratic rival, Politico reported.

"I think that not just because of the strong economy and the fact that people are going to see increasingly rising wages, but I think it's also true because I think our Democrat friends are likely to nominate someone who is really out of the mainstream of American thought and will make it easier for a president who's presiding over a growing economy," Romney said.
Click to expand...
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement





Back
Top