Anti-Trump Hysteria and Silliness

#9,751
#9,751
BowlBrother85 said:
2) Use the tired, boring, worn out cliche "Can we impeach him for this?" This is an attempt at minimizing the act itself in a very flippant manner.
Click to expand...

Well, considering some of your party in Congress started talking impeachment even before he took office, it's a valid joke. I don't remember you saying anything about that.

Or when Maxine Waters suggested we had to impeach Trump to determine the crime. Where were you on that one?

No, I'll continue using it because it's funny and your side of the political spectrum went into an impeachment frenzy at everything the man did after he got elected and took office.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#9,752
#9,752
McDad said:
Ok. This looks dirty. But how is this different from every politician behaves in DC?
Click to expand...

What’s dirty about it? China rips off every IP under the sun. Maybe they are trying to clean up their act. My guess is similar results were had for other filings during this period. But that’s not as interesting.
 
#9,753
#9,753
DancingOutlaw said:
What’s dirty about it? China rips off every IP under the sun. Maybe they are trying to clean up their act. My guess is similar results were had for other filings during this period. But that’s not as interesting.
Click to expand...

I said it LOOKS dirty. Seems she may have had preferential treatment due to her dad's position.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#9,754
#9,754
McDad said:
I said it LOOKS dirty. Seems she may have had preferential treatment due to her dad's position.
Click to expand...

It also seems that Trump reversed a U.S. foreign policy as part of a quid pro quo arrangement in order to enrich a member of his own family ... which would indeed be an impeachable offence.

If a person has to ask what is wrong with that, I would ask what is wrong with you?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#9,757
#9,757
BowlBrother85 said:
It also seems that Trump reversed a U.S. foreign policy as part of a quid pro quo arrangement in order to enrich a member of his own family ... which would indeed be an impeachable offence.

If a person has to ask what is wrong with that, I would ask what is wrong with you?
Click to expand...

Seems...

But did he?

See? I suspect that Obama, Clinton, Cool and the gang all altered foreign policy and got rich in the Uranium One deal. I also suspect they all got rich from the Iran Nuclear deal. But I personally haven't spoken much about it because that's just appearances. I suspect that it's being seriously investigated in the background right now. And I suspect proof will be given.

Then I'll start talking about it quite a bit.

So, short of what "seems" to have happened...? Glad you've finally developed a conscience on the matter of gov't corruption, now that it's the opposite party in charge. And can you impeach him for it?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#9,759
#9,759
Orange_Crush said:
Seems...

But did he?

See? I suspect that Obama, Clinton, Cool and the gang all altered foreign policy and got rich in the Uranium One deal. I also suspect they all got rich from the Iran Nuclear deal. But I personally haven't spoken much about it because that's just appearances. I suspect that it's being seriously investigated in the background right now. And I suspect proof will be given.

Then I'll start talking about it quite a bit.

So, short of what "seems" to have happened...? Glad you've finally developed a conscience on the matter of gov't corruption, now that it's the opposite party in charge. And can you impeach him for it?
Click to expand...

And the corruption is abundant in the oval office, the house and senate, probably even SCOTUS.

Remember when Congress wanted to pass laws preventing reps from profiting on inside info?
 
#9,760
#9,760
BowlBrother85 said:
It also seems that Trump reversed a U.S. foreign policy as part of a quid pro quo arrangement in order to enrich a member of his own family ... which would indeed be an impeachable offence.

If a person has to ask what is wrong with that, I would ask what is wrong with you?
Click to expand...

Do you have ANY proof she was given preferential treatment?
 
#9,761
#9,761
BowlBrother85 said:
Trump has already sent 6 tweets before 7:30 am today... They're unfocused, repetitive and mostly very childish. Take a look at those tweets from the last hour and tell me that's a "very stable genius". lol
Click to expand...
Yet you read them. Why?

I haven't watched one second of CNNPMSNBC and I will bet you I could recite chapter and verse what they are saying.
 
#9,762
#9,762
BowlBrother85 said:
:eek:lol:

I saw this stat on Politico:

In just under 500 days in office, Trump has sent a little over 3,000 tweets. That is about 1 tweet every 4 hours. Holy s***!
Click to expand...

Fortunately for Trump, it's easy to Tweet from a golf cart and he spends more time on the golf course than most players on the PGA Tour.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#9,763
#9,763
TN Ribs said:
Fortunately for Trump, it's easy to Tweet from a golf cart and he spends more time on the golf course than most players on the PGA Tour.
Click to expand...

And he runs the free world to mad success while doing it. I agree. He's a talented guy. More talented than most of us ordinary folks.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#9,765
#9,765
BowlBrother85 said:
Obviously, these aren't the same trademarks she was approved for in the article I posted above.
Click to expand...

This seems to be correct. although what the actual trademarks were for neither really specifies. Hog references ones for clothes, handbags, and make-up, i think, BB's just says its trademark for the use of her likeness.

BB's article doesn't specify when she applied, just that it was after daddy was elected. but it also continues the lie that Trump's win in China happened after his election too. so they might be wrong there, I don't care enough to research, just reviewing the articles.
 
#9,766
#9,766
Orange_Crush said:
And he runs the free world to mad success while doing it. I agree. He's a talented guy. More talented than most of us ordinary folks.
Click to expand...

The vast majority of people in the US and the world disagree with you wholeheartedly. His approval rating is well below 50%, the numbers don't lie.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#9,768
#9,768
TN Ribs said:
The vast majority of people in the US and the world disagree with you wholeheartedly. His approval rating is well below 50%, the numbers don't lie.
Click to expand...
I think some have him at 49%. You could push him over the top. There is room under the Trump tent. Come join us!
 
#9,769
#9,769
TN Ribs said:
The vast majority of people in the US and the world disagree with you wholeheartedly. His approval rating is well below 50%, the numbers don't lie.
Click to expand...

Vast majority? Come on, I'd say that the vast majority of the world DGAF who our president is.
 
#9,770
#9,770
hog88 said:
Vast majority? Come on, I'd say that the vast majority of the world DGAF who our president is.
Click to expand...
That is an interesting point of discussion. I would say the vast majority of countries that don't matter don't gaf, but those that do matter do have an opinion. And the problem with it is that (ask anybody that has been overseas) they are flooded with "news" via CNN and that forms a big part of their opinion. Add to the fact that most European countries are socialistic in nature anyway and President Donald Trump will have a negative rating there. Now here is where I come in with MY opinion that I DGAF that the French, Germans, Italians etc etc etc think MY president is a rogue crazy man, because for the previous 8 years we had one that kissed their collective asses and we got run over by a train as a result.


We DID build that, and it's high time they remember it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#9,772
#9,772
SpaceCoastVol said:
Yet you read them. Why?

I haven't watched one second of CNNPMSNBC and I will bet you I could recite chapter and verse what they are saying.
Click to expand...

Also, in one of Trump's tweets early this morning, he seems to be saying that Robert Mueller (a Republican) and his team will be meddling with the mid-term elections... How else could you interpret this:

"The 13 Angry Democrats (plus people who worked 8 years for Obama) working on the rigged Russian Witch Hunt, will be MEDDLING with the mid-term elections, especially now that Republicans (stay tough) are taking the lead in Polls. There was no Collusion, except by the Democrats!"

He is bat s***, f***ing crazy!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#9,774
#9,774
BowlBrother85 said:
Also, in one of Trump's tweets early this morning, he seems to be saying that Robert Mueller (a Republican) and his team will be meddling with the mid-term elections... How else could you interpret this:

"The 13 Angry Democrats (plus people who worked 8 years for Obama) working on the rigged Russian Witch Hunt, will be MEDDLING with the mid-term elections, especially now that Republicans (stay tough) are taking the lead in Polls. There was no Collusion, except by the Democrats!"

He is bat s***, f***ing crazy!
Click to expand...
Yet you KEEP reading.

#Trumpiswinning
 
#9,775
#9,775
BowlBrother85 said:
Also, in one of Trump's tweets early this morning, he seems to be saying that Robert Mueller (a Republican) and his team will be meddling with the mid-term elections... How else could you interpret this:

"The 13 Angry Democrats (plus people who worked 8 years for Obama) working on the rigged Russian Witch Hunt, will be MEDDLING with the mid-term elections, especially now that Republicans (stay tough) are taking the lead in Polls. There was no Collusion, except by the Democrats!"

He is bat s***, f***ing crazy!
Click to expand...

Just stop with that. Nobody is a Republican or Democrat when they reach the heights of Director of the FBI, CIA, ext. They are establishment, political parties are meaningless in those positions.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement





Back
Top