TrumpPutingate III: the beginning of the end

#7,476
#7,476
orangeluvr said:
You and your pals on here support the minority opinion, the majority of Americans favor letting the investigation follow it's course and finding out the truth.Some of us can't handle the truth. If tRump is found innocent fine, if not, no one is above the law.
Click to expand...

Quoted for later reference. Let’s see how well this post ages. Lol.
 
#7,477
#7,477
Vol0725 said:
So who’s the FBI source who was allegedly spying on Trump campaign? Stefan Halper, maybe?

More on Stefan Halper and his Russian allegations.

Cambridge spy seminars hit by whispers of Russian links as three intelligence experts resign

A piece about Stefan Halper which will open your eyes.

Papadopoulos Met Cambridge Prof In London | The Daily Caller

What was Hakluyt’s role in the spying scandal on the Trump team?

Dearlove Connections – UK Intel Firm Hakluyt, Alexander Downer, Stefan Halper & Papadopoulos
Click to expand...
It's coming together slowly, but the pieces are falling in place.
 
#7,478
#7,478
NorthDallas40 said:
Yeah... I think you’re about to be really shocked on who the guilty are. Back to that “partisan blinder” statement! And “truth” has never really been a requirement for a good old fashion witch hunt. Might want to adjust your own blinders orangelubber.

Looking forward to Barry Hussein’s perp walk on conspiracy charges. Woohoo!
Click to expand...

So tribal you are! So a fellow repupub is trying to take down a fellow repub and the repub was appointed by a fellow repub, that's a witch hunt alright! :crazy:
The Benghazi investigation was a $7M, 4 year partisan witch hunt that produced zero indictments. So Faux"News" is bringing conspiracy charges on BO! :birgits_giggle: You tRuplicans are nucking futs! :eek:lol:
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#7,480
#7,480
orangeluvr said:
So tribal you are! So a fellow repupub is trying to take down a fellow repub and the repub was appointed by a fellow repub, that's a witch hunt alright! :crazy:
The Benghazi investigation was a $7M, 4 year partisan witch hunt that produced zero indictments. So Faux"News" is bringing conspiracy charges on BO! :birgits_giggle: You tRuplicans are nucking futs! :eek:lol:
Click to expand...

Psychological projection - Wikipedia

Lol.
 
#7,482
#7,482
orangeluvr said:
The post will age well b/c enforcing the rule of law which keeps this country civilized means absolutely no one is above the law lrregardless of name or party.
Click to expand...

Not the part of the quote I was saving and you know it orangelubber. Your tiny little brain will never EVER admit Trump is innocent even after that finding comes back.
 
#7,485
#7,485
orangeluvr said:
So tribal you are! So a fellow repupub is trying to take down a fellow repub and the repub was appointed by a fellow repub, that's a witch hunt alright! :crazy:
The Benghazi investigation was a $7M, 4 year partisan witch hunt that produced zero indictments. So Faux"News" is bringing conspiracy charges on BO! :birgits_giggle: You tRuplicans are nucking futs! :eek:lol:
Click to expand...

Benghazi was nothing compared to the Trump related investigations, yet republicans gleefully allowed it to go on and on maintaining Clinton's guilt the whole time despite a lack of evidence. (and they still bring it up like she's guilty of something)
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#7,486
#7,486
luthervol said:
Benghazi was nothing compared to the Trump related investigations, yet republicans gleefully allowed it to go on and on maintaining Clinton's guilt the whole time despite a lack of evidence. (and they still bring it up like she's guilty of something)
Click to expand...

Clinton wasn't being investigated in the Benghazi hearings, the event, what lead up to it and why the "misinformation" were being investigated. Nobody was being hauled in front of grand juries and no special prosecutor was appointed, the FBI wasn't even involved.

Also if the Obama administration including the State Department would have just been forthcoming the hearings would have been over in a month. So you cannot compare the two.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#7,487
#7,487
luthervol said:
Benghazi was nothing compared to the Trump related investigations, yet republicans gleefully allowed it to go on and on maintaining Clinton's guilt the whole time despite a lack of evidence. (and they still bring it up like she's guilty of something)
Click to expand...

Actually several of us think a non partisan Benghazi investigation never actually occurred and that is our primary compliant. Since we don’t think a real investigation occurred we agree it was a huge waste of time and resources.

And this is the EXACT stance your side already has lined up on the Trump collusion BS but we are going to gleefully beat you over the head with your own statements about how it was Republicans investigating Republicans thus we should have nothing to worry about.
 
#7,488
#7,488
hog88 said:
Clinton wasn't being investigated in the Benghazi hearings, the event, what lead up to it and why the "misinformation" were being investigated. Nobody was being hauled in front of grand juries and no special prosecutor was appointed, the FBI wasn't even involved.

Also if the Obama administration including the State Department would have just been forthcoming the hearings would have been over in a month. So you cannot compare the two.
Click to expand...

I honestly didn't pay the whole thing much attention. I heard the far right screaming about Clinton's guilt and assumed it was just another in the long string of conspiracies fabricated to damage her. It seems I was right.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#7,489
#7,489
luthervol said:
I honestly didn't pay the whole thing much attention. I heard the far right screaming about Clinton's guilt and assumed it was just another in the long string of conspiracies fabricated to damage her. It seems I was right.
Click to expand...

It damaged her badly. She can't even walk stairs anymore.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#7,490
#7,490
luthervol said:
Who's excusing the behavior? Not me.

I said if it's true and unwarranted and unjustified, lock them all up for life. (that doesn't sound like excusing the behavior to me).

On the other hand, if it's true, and was warranted and justifiable, then so be it. It needed to be done and I'm glad they did it. Impeach Trump and lock him and whoever else is deserving up for life.

Let's see the facts. After all, that's YOUR rallying cry.
Click to expand...

I'm all for waiting on actual facts, but gathering evidence should be done in a legal manner. Planting a mole in an opponents campaign smacks of impropriety. You say if it was "justifiable". It's not justifiable. An investigation might have been justifiable. Planting a mole is not.

IF you read my previous posts, you'll not I stress IF quite a few times in regard to the allegation. I also stress that I hope it's not true, because I know it's wrong for either party to do. You've made it clear you feel things are only wrong when the action is taken by a Republican. Some people don't have ethics ruled by partisanship.
 
#7,491
#7,491
luthervol said:
I honestly didn't pay the whole thing much attention. I heard the far right screaming about Clinton's guilt and assumed it was just another in the long string of conspiracies fabricated to damage her. It seems I was right.
Click to expand...

As north alluded to, there wasn't an investigation. The question of why in the hell the Ambassador was there in the first place was never asked. If they were actually investigating that should have been the first question asked.

It was all political theater that even those on the right like me got pissed at.
 
#7,492
#7,492
luthervol said:
I honestly didn't pay the whole thing much attention. I heard the far right screaming about Clinton's guilt and assumed it was just another in the long string of conspiracies fabricated to damage her. It seems I was right.
Click to expand...

Yes, the four American deaths, including that of the Ambassador, were totally fabricated just to damage Hillary and her political hopes.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#7,494
#7,494
Sorry if the last post comes across a little snappy, but 4 Americans were killed, and the suggestion that looking for answers as to the why was a political hit job on Hillary is something that still pushes buttons for me. It deserved a fair investigation, and why those people were hung out to dry deserves to be answered. Whether or not it was Hillary's fault is irrelevant. Why it happened is not.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#7,496
#7,496
Weezer said:
Sorry if the last post comes across a little snappy, but 4 Americans were killed, and the suggestion that looking for answers as to the why was a political hit job on Hillary is something that still pushes buttons for me. It deserved a fair investigation, and why those people were hung out to dry deserves to be answered. Whether or not it was Hillary's fault is irrelevant. Why it happened is not.
Click to expand...

That was never answered because if it was there would be people headed to prison. Or should be headed to prison but we have a select few that are above the law.
 
#7,497
#7,497
Weezer said:
Yes, the four American deaths, including that of the Ambassador, were totally fabricated just to damage Hillary and her political hopes.
Click to expand...

I'm in no way making light of the four deaths. Just as with the four killed in Niger, it's tragic. There were obviously missteps along the way and things that could have been done differently in hindsight. There may have even been some degree of cover up after each of the two incidents.

I just always felt the far right was trying to use the tragedy to their political advantage and to further demonize Clinton. But like I said, I didn't follow the story very closely.
 
#7,499
#7,499
evillawyer said:
Wall Street Journal: Suspected FBI Mole Planted in Trump Campaign

This link should be free. Summarizes her points
Click to expand...

Seems like she's engaged in A LOT of speculation. For example, she assumes that if there was a source in the Trump campaign, that source was placed there by the FBI. Even assuming that someone within the Trump campaign was feeding the FBI intel, it seems just as possible that this person became concerned about what was happening and contacted the FBI in the same way the Australians contacted the FBI about Papadopoulis (spelling?).
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#7,500
#7,500
evillawyer said:
Seems like she's engaged in A LOT of speculation. For example, she assumes that if there was a source in the Trump campaign, that source was placed there by the FBI. Even assuming that someone within the Trump campaign was feeding the FBI intel, it seems just as possible that this person became concerned about what was happening and contacted the FBI in the same way the Australians contacted the FBI about Papadopoulis (spelling?).
Click to expand...

No, not anywhere near as possible.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement





Back
Top