TrumpPutingate III: the beginning of the end

Yes, I understand that. Trump was running for President as part of a political party opposite of the sitting President. Do you understand the conflict of interest involved? Do you understand Trump was running against someone who was a part of that administration. If you cannot see the impropriety, you're blind.

Well, that is the most likely explanation. Manafort had been under investigation by the FBI for quite some time. I don't see any conflict of interest in the FBI continuing their monitoring of him after he became Trump's campaign manager. Of course, this is assuming a lot as well. It is pointless to speculate until we learn more...
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Looking at a timeline, Manafort was part of Trump's campaign for 5 months. He was campaign manager for like two.
 
Well, that is the most likely explanation. Manafort had been under investigation by the FBI for quite some time. I don't see any conflict of interest in the FBI continuing their monitoring of him after he became Trump's campaign manager. Of course, this is assuming a lot as well. It is pointless to speculate until we learn more...

But speculation is what you and your liberal friends do so well. What's the matter? Is it not okay to speculate when the shoe's on the other foot? :eek:hmy:
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5 people
But speculation is what you and your liberal friends do so well. What's the matter? Is it not okay to speculate when the shoe's on the other foot? :eek:hmy:

This is so true. The inertia of this thread is driven by a select group of posters who devour each new morsel of gossip and each new unproven allegation and speculate the hell out it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
Luther, if it were to come out that the FBI, under Obama, planted a mole in Trump's campaign, how would that make you feel? Seems every bit as bad as Watergate, worse even. The difference is who could you actually pursue for charges? I'm not sure there's anyone. The idea of it turning out to be true is kind of mindboggling. As mindboggling as a Presidential candidate colluding with a foreign power to rig an election. Glad I'm not the type to believe pure speculation.

Think of it this way the Russians planted a mole in the Trump camp. That mole just happen to be under a FISA warrant.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
The reason was they were hoping to help Hillary win. And they still failed.

Seriously, you have to know what you're saying is complete horse ****. There is not enough "reason" in the world for a Democratic President to okay the placing of a mole in a Republican's Presidential campaign. It's so bad, I'm really hoping it's not true. That you would try to make an excuse is pretty damn sad.
You talk about reason and sticking to the facts and then turn around and say it was done to help Hilary like that is a fact. It's not even logical.

I'll say it again, it is far more probable that a mole was planted because of some reason related to Trump and his associates, than as a way to help Hilary.

If you're right, lock up everyone involved for life. If I'm right, impeach Trump (and maybe lock him and his associates up for life.).
 
At least eight alt-right website domain names were registered to Columbus Nova, the company that paid hundreds of thousands of dollars to President Donald Trump's personal attorney Michael Cohen, according to internet records reviewed by CNN.

The domains, which include alternate-right.com, alt-rights.com and alternate-rt.com, were created in August 2016 during the presidential campaign season. That same month, CNN and other news outlets reported on the rising profile of the alt-right movement and its white nationalist connections.
Records show an employee, Frederick Intrater, whose brother Andrew Intrater is the CEO of Columbus Nova, used his company email address to register the web domains, and listed Columbus Nova as the registrant organization, along with the company's address.

Alt-right web domain names registered to company that paid Cohen - CNNPolitics
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
You talk about reason and sticking to the facts and then turn around and say it was done to help Hilary like that is a fact. It's not even logical.

I'll say it again, it is far more probable that a mole was planted because of some reason related to Trump and his associates, than as a way to help Hilary.

If you're right, lock up everyone involved for life. If I'm right, impeach Trump (and maybe lock him and his associates up for life.).

The Hillary comment was a joke. I assumed by starting the second part with "seriously" it would be made clear I was jabbing you a little. Going forward, would you prefer I not assume you intelligent enough to figure that out? :p
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
Also, theorize all you want, I still find it inappropriate IF it happened. Certain areas should have been off limits knowing the impropriety it represented.
 
What if it happened as a result of the FBI investigation into Manafort? That would be acceptable.

No, absolutely not. They should have notified the Trump campaign Manafort was under investigation.

If they planted a mole in the Trump campaign it dwarfs anything the Russians are accused of.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
Well, that is the most likely explanation. Manafort had been under investigation by the FBI for quite some time. I don't see any conflict of interest in the FBI continuing their monitoring of him after he became Trump's campaign manager. Of course, this is assuming a lot as well. It is pointless to speculate until we learn more...

:lolabove:
 
The Hillary comment was a joke. I assumed by starting the second part with "seriously" it would be made clear I was jabbing you a little. Going forward, would you prefer I not assume you intelligent enough to figure that out? :p

Probably a safe assumption, given your humor. (that's a joke)

You said "Seriously, you have to know what you're saying is complete horse****" Is that also part of the joke? I realize it comes after "seriously", but how could anyone know that was complete horse****? It's more plausible than the alternative explanation.
 
Probably a safe assumption, given your humor. (that's a joke)

You said "Seriously, you have to know what you're saying is complete horse****" Is that also part of the joke? I realize it comes after "seriously", but how could anyone know that was complete horse****? It's more plausible than the alternative explanation.

It's complete horse **** for you to excuse the behavior because it was the administration of a Democrat doing it to a Republican. If it was a Republican administration doing it to a Democrat, you'd be in conniptions. To be clear, I'm saying you are allowing political bias to blind you to just how wrong this type of action would be. Well, political bias plus your absolute disdain of all things Trump. It is not okay for either party to engage in such behavior.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Lol the libtards continually accuse Republicans and Trump of collusion, obstruction, being amoral, and generally taking lunch money from needy kids.

Then it comes out that the previous Democratic adminstration actually conspired and spyed on a US citizen with no apparent authority to do so and nah totally ok I’m sure they had good reason to do so.

If this is true Barry Hussein needs to be perp walked in in hand cuffs and indicted on conspiracy charges.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
Lol the libtards continually accuse Republicans and Trump of collusion, obstruction, being amoral, and generally taking lunch money from needy kids.

Then it comes out that the previous Democratic adminstration actually conspired and spyed on a US citizen with no apparent authority to do so and nah totally ok I’m sure they had good reason to do so.

If this is true Barry Hussein needs to be perp walked in in hand cuffs and indicted on conspiracy charges.

If this is true......that's a pretty big if. I think it's unfounded horse****......to use Weezer's term.

If what is speculated by many about Trump is true......you guys have been screaming incessantly that that is a pretty big if.

Let's let the "ifs" be proven. That's all we've wanted from the beginning. Let Mueller's investigation play out and then see the conclusions.

IF other investigations need to take place, great, let them happen and wait for the conclusions.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
It's complete horse **** for you to excuse the behavior because it was the administration of a Democrat doing it to a Republican. If it was a Republican administration doing it to a Democrat, you'd be in conniptions. To be clear, I'm saying you are allowing political bias to blind you to just how wrong this type of action would be. Well, political bias plus your absolute disdain of all things Trump. It is not okay for either party to engage in such behavior.

Who's excusing the behavior? Not me.

I said if it's true and unwarranted and unjustified, lock them all up for life. (that doesn't sound like excusing the behavior to me).

On the other hand, if it's true, and was warranted and justifiable, then so be it. It needed to be done and I'm glad they did it. Impeach Trump and lock him and whoever else is deserving up for life.

Let's see the facts. After all, that's YOUR rallying cry.
 
Last edited:
If this is true......that's a pretty big if. I think it's unfounded horse****......to use Weezer's term.

If what is speculated by many about Trump is true......you guys have been screaming incessantly that that is a pretty big if.

Let's let the "ifs" be proven. That's all we've wanted from the beginning. Let Mueller's investigation play out and then see the conclusions.

IF other investigations need to take place, great, let them happen and wait for the conclusions.

ROTFLMFAO!! We’ve gone from “Impeach Trump!! Impeach Trump!! The evidence shows he’s guilty as hell!! Ahhhhhhhh!! to “No way your speculation here is valid and clearly is the same as your dismissive attitude as our speculation on Trump”!

Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!

All I know is boy the silence on this board and the MSM outlets on this revelation is deafening this morning. Wonder why? 🤔
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
Advertisement





Back
Top