Iran nuclear program. It is a lie

#252
#252
Pacer92 said:
How many American lives are lost in a war against Iran or North Korea?! A lot...

Is it worth that?!
Click to expand...

How many lives are lost each year by terrorists financed by Iran? Just ask and they will tell you they want to kill everyone who is not muslim, not shy about it either. Now lets close our eyes to this plague and hope it goes away. Same as NK these regimes are saber rattlers nothing more. Their troops are no better then the Iraq troops. Its all a bluff. Time to call the bluff and apply the toughest sanctions possible.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#253
#253
IPleadInsanity said:
How many lives are lost each year by terrorists financed by Iran? Just ask and they will tell you they want to kill everyone who is not muslim, not shy about it either. Now lets close our eyes to this plague and hope it goes away. Same as NK these regimes are saber rattlers nothing more. Their troops are no better then the Iraq troops. Its all a bluff. Time to call the bluff and apply the toughest sanctions possible.
Click to expand...

How many?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 8 people
#261
#261
Ras playing catch up I see.

Let me ask the collective forum a question about atomic/nuclear weapons. Should any country be allowed to develop them that sees fit to? I'm not talking about the US specifically getting involved in trying to stop it, but in the court of world opinion and policy, should any nation that wants them be allowed to withdraw from the non-proliferation treaty if they see fit without any international repercussions?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#263
#263
Grand Vol said:
Ras playing catch up I see.

Let me ask the collective forum a question about atomic/nuclear weapons. Should any country be allowed to develop them that sees fit to? I'm not talking about the US specifically getting involved in trying to stop it, but in the court of world opinion and policy, should any nation that wants them be allowed to withdraw from the non-proliferation treaty if they see fit without any international repercussions?
Click to expand...

Sure.
What could possibly go wrong?
 
#265
#265
n_huffhines said:
Did they hate us before 1953?* Have we given them a reason not to hate us since?

Your theory is faulty.

* Iran–United States relations - Wikipedia
Click to expand...

These are people who believe strapping a bomb to your ass and blowing yourself in public not only gets you to Heaven, but 72 virgins to boot. I'm fairly certain reason is not something they really use. But hey, go on believing what you want. When are you taking that vacation to Tehran again?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#268
#268
Grand Vol said:
Ras playing catch up I see.

Let me ask the collective forum a question about atomic/nuclear weapons. Should any country be allowed to develop them that sees fit to? I'm not talking about the US specifically getting involved in trying to stop it, but in the court of world opinion and policy, should any nation that wants them be allowed to withdraw from the non-proliferation treaty if they see fit without any international repercussions?
Click to expand...

Yes.
 
#269
#269
Weezer said:
First off, not gonna contend Trump is trustworthy. But how exactly does bankruptcy equate to not trustworthy?
Click to expand...

Only liars and cheats over extend their credit and need to restructure. If only they could print money.
 
#270
#270
Orangeslice13 said:
Sure.
What could possibly go wrong?
Click to expand...

I think it's a legitimate question. I would suppose that would depend on one's thoughts as to whether more nukes would keep the peace better. Even those nuclear armed nations that have armed conflicts tend to not use them. Only used twice and not since.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#271
#271
Grand Vol said:
Ras playing catch up I see.
Click to expand...

Forgive me, I've been working all day.

Grand Vol said:
Let me ask the collective forum a question about atomic/nuclear weapons. Should any country be allowed to develop them that sees fit to? I'm not talking about the US specifically getting involved in trying to stop it, but in the court of world opinion and policy, should any nation that wants them be allowed to withdraw from the non-proliferation treaty if they see fit without any international repercussions?
Click to expand...

Short answer is yes, they should be allowed.

More detailed answer relies on me clarifying something you posted:

"should any nation that wants them be allowed to withdraw from the non-proliferation treaty"

First off, in order for you to withdraw, you first had to join. I say that because we have nations out here that have signed no non-proliferation agreements, yet still have nukes.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#275
#275
n_huffhines said:
And it's our choice to try to better the relationship or not. Why wouldn't we try to make things better?
Click to expand...

Get rid of their wacko religion - particularly the part about it running the state, and you might be surprised how reasonable a place Iran becomes. That won't happen with their religious nut jobs running everything. But it's not our place to make that happen; so until Iranians wake up and revolt, Iran will remain a pariah.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement













Back
Top