Mass shooting of the week, high school in parkland, FL.

[hndog609]

Answer this.....

What constitutes a legitimate social media threat? Try to be specific.

True Threat: a threat that a reasonable person would interpret as a real and serious communication of an intent to inflict harm.

 

[luthervol]

I understand perfectly well.

A student posts a picture of himself holding a gun with a caption saying "I'm about to lose it." Should that be taken as a threat?

What if instead the caption said, "see you at school tomorrow."?

What if it said, "I'm taking out 19."

Should any of these be taken by school officials as threats?

I'm going to kill, blow up, destroy, hurt, ext someone or a specific target.

How about these?

 

[FLVOL_79]

True Threat: a threat that a reasonable person would interpret as a real and serious communication of an intent to inflict harm.

You lost him right there

 

[Grand Vol]

You lost him right there

It can't be quantified with an X and Y equation, hence, it's over his head.

 

[hog88]

Glorifying another mass shooter would be another example of something that should be checked into.

I can understand that.

 

[tumscalcium]

Answer this.....

What constitutes a legitimate social media threat? Try to be specific.

You wouldn’t understand. Just the thought of a gun sends you screaming into the fetal position.

 

[Grand Vol]

I can understand that.

However, going to a gun range with a parent and learning gun safety isn't one of them.

 

[SpaceCoastVol]

And if you think about it, the democratic gene pool would most likely be much deeper than the republican gene pool.

Please explain why Republicans have women like Melania and Democrats have Rachael Maddow. IF that's not inbreeding, I don't know what is.

 

[hog88]

How about these?

Possibly if there is some history. But any of those snippets could easily be taken out of context. In any case the school/LEO should never confront a minor without their parents when it it comes to matters of possible criminal behavior.

 

[hog88]

However, going to a gun range with a parent and learning gun safety isn't one of them.

No, not in the least.

Luther just doing what Luther does, moves the goalposts until he can claim victory.

 

[Mick]

Please explain why Republicans have women like Melania and Democrats have Rachael Maddow. IF that's not inbreeding, I don't know what is.

Melania was imported.

 

[luthervol]

How about these written on the boy's bathroom wall?

"A bomb is going off at 2:00 today."

"I brought a bomb to school."

"I'm going to blow this place up."

"Blow it up."

"Someone should blow this place to the ground."

"The bomb is ticking."

"I hope the bomb works."

"Explosions in one hour and counting."

Should any of these be taken seriously? Which ones? Who should decide?

 

[hog88]

How about these written on the boy's bathroom wall?

"A bomb is going off at 2:00 today."

"I brought a bomb to school."

"I'm going to blow this place up."

"Blow it up."

"Someone should blow this place to the ground."

"The bomb is ticking."

"I hope the bomb works."

"Explosions in one hour and counting."

Should any of these be taken seriously? Which ones? Who should decide?

Or

"For a good time call Luther"

 

[Squints]

How about these written on the boy's bathroom wall?

"A bomb is going off at 2:00 today."

"I brought a bomb to school."

"I'm going to blow this place up."

"Blow it up."

"Someone should blow this place to the ground."

"The bomb is ticking."

"I hope the bomb works."

"Explosions in one hour and counting."

Should any of these be taken seriously? Which ones? Who should decide?

In a stall, each and every one of those are aptly appropriate.

 

[midnight orange]

In a stall, each and every one of those are aptly appropriate.

Thread winner.

 

[Mick]

How about these written on the boy's bathroom wall?

"A bomb is going off at 2:00 today."

"I brought a bomb to school."

"I'm going to blow this place up."

"Blow it up."

"Someone should blow this place to the ground."

"The bomb is ticking."

"I hope the bomb works."

"Explosions in one hour and counting."

Should any of these be taken seriously? Which ones? Who should decide?

Kyle Kashuv - Wikipedia

He has been very politically active since the shooting and that is exactly what this is, an insensitive political statement. He was being a little p**ck and deserved to be questioned.

 

[BeecherVol]

Kyle Kashuv - Wikipedia

He has been very politically active since the shooting and that is exactly what this is, an insensitive political statement. He was being a little p**ck and deserved to be questioned.

Luther level reached.

Congrats.

 

[midnight orange]

Kyle Kashuv - Wikipedia

He has been very politically active since the shooting and that is exactly what this is, an insensitive political statement. He was being a little p**ck and deserved to be questioned.

None of which are crimes or threats. This is advocating using law enforcement to harass those of whom we disagree with.

 

[volfanhill]

None of which are crimes or threats. This is advocating using law enforcement to harass those of whom we disagree with.

It’s Mick. He’s pretty anti constitution.

 

[hog88]

None of which are crimes or threats. This is advocating using law enforcement to harass those of whom we disagree with.

Mick and Luther are fine with that, as long as their like minded folks are controlling LEO.

 

[BeecherVol]

You guys collectively have no depth of thought.

I have acknowledged that he did none of those things...more than once.

I said that if the kid had no previous "red flags", then the school and LEO over reacted and should be dealt with accordingly....numerous times.

How you guys continually fail to process what has been said is baffling.

My whole effort has been an attempt to get unanimous acknowledgement that a line must be drawn and then determine where that line is drawn and by whom. You guys continually run from that debate. There are only a couple of reasons as to why that would be true. Neither are very flattering.

A student should not post anything on social media showing him armed and shooting a gun unless he WANTS to be called in and questioned. Plus, he was told repeatedly that he had done nothing wrong.

I think all students are aware that in today's climate, posting gun activity on social media is a guaranteed ticket to visit the resource officer.

The below bold shows it shouldn't matter if he made any verbal threats in his linked video. Which is why your hypo's entered the discussion. The idea ( or horror on your end and many others) of him having a gun in his hand and firing it in a controlled enviroment with a professional instructor was enough to warrant interrogation.

 

[BeecherVol]

Mick and Luther are fine with that, as long as their like minded folks are controlling the politics and LEO.

.

 

[luthervol]

The below bold shows it shouldn't matter if he made any verbal threats in his linked video. Which is why your hypo's entered the discussion. The idea ( or horror on your end and many others) of him having a gun in his hand and firing it in a controlled enviroment with a professional instructor was enough to warrant interrogation.

Were you making a point?

A student should assume that posting a video of himself shooting an AR15 on social media will result in a "conversation" with an administrator or resource officer.

 

[82_VOL_83]

Kyle Kashuv - Wikipedia

He has been very politically active since the shooting and that is exactly what this is, an insensitive political statement. He was being a little p**ck and deserved to be questioned.

What exactly did he do to deserve being interrogated as a minor with no access to an impartial witness?

Once again folks, welcome to the new face of tyranny. Learn it, know it, fight it where you can. The blind acceptance of what was done to this kid by those that have an agenda that gets argued with is astounding yet is the new face of the ******* that are now becoming more and more prevalent in this country.

 

[RikidyBones]

Were you making a point?

A student should assume that posting a video of himself shooting an AR15 on social media will result in a "conversation" with an administrator or resource officer.

why?