Recruiting Discussion

Status
Not open for further replies.
#6,651
#6,651
bleedingTNorange said:
Is it bad luck, or is that gonna be similar across the board?

I’m not saying 50-100 is the same as unranked, just saying maybe the gap isn’t quite that big in those areas of the rankings? I’m not gonna look up 100 prospects in each class for the last 10 years, I picked Tennessee to look and see what the results said, I’m not sure 10 years of data can all be credited to bad luck though.
Click to expand...

Need to warn Tom Izzo about the three 50-100 guys in this years class.

Better let Villanova know as well. They take lots of those guys.
 
#6,652
#6,652
BigZiti09 said:
Bruin is just spraying all over the place trying to find something.

He didn’t know scout was gone. Thought rankings were just through 100. He tried the old more 3* are successful than 4*. Well yeah. There’s a million of them.

He is lost. He finally find a talking point that I can’t even wrap my mind around his point or why he’s arguing with me about it. And would bet dollars to doughnuts he crafted this dumbass argument after he read my chart and then pretended to read it later.
Click to expand...

Lol


Go back to bed with your L.

You were so generous you proved my point and yes some services still only rank 100
 
Last edited:
#6,653
#6,653
BigZiti09 said:
Need to warn Tom Izzo about the three 50-100 guys in this years class.

Better let Villanova know as well. They take lots of those guys.
Click to expand...

Hmmm what about their top 50 guys?

You realize those guys count and help win games to?

And yea I think we need some of those if we are going to win nattys
 
#6,655
#6,655
BigZiti09 said:
Bruin you literally have rambled nonsense all freakin day. Go do some browsing on scout.com ya dolt.
Click to expand...

Hey ziti scout combined with 247 a few months ago. That is irrelevant when discussing players already on campus. Feel free to use their rankings to make your stance look better.
You really need it because you look foolish


If it makes you feel better I didn't know they fully combined after I dropped my membership with IT. I was wrong about that but thanks for proving that's the only thing I am wrong about here
 
#6,656
#6,656
BruinVol said:
Hey ziti scout combined with 247 a few months ago. That is irrelevant when discussing players already on campus. Feel free to use their rankings to make your stance look better.
You really need it because you look foolish


If it makes you feel better I didn't know they fully combined after I dropped my membership with IT. I was wrong about that but thanks for proving that's the only thing I am wrong about here
Click to expand...

Provide the scout rankings for the players on campus Bruin.

I’ll wait.
 
#6,657
#6,657
You don’t know what my stance is. You came up with some baseless theory that players ranked 50-100 suck.

Nothing you’ve said today makes any sense.

On top of that you’re a petty jackass.
 
#6,659
#6,659
BigZiti09 said:
You don’t know what my stance is. You came up with some baseless theory that players ranked 50-100 suck .
Click to expand...

That's a freaking lie. I said there was no difference is a player ranked 75 and one ranked 125 in terms of success. I said the nerds aren't very good at rating kids after the top 50.
Some will be great some won't.
 
#6,661
#6,661
BruinVol said:
That's a freaking lie. I said there was no difference is a player ranked 75 and one ranked 125 in terms of success. I said the nerds aren't very good at rating kids after the top 50.
Some will be great some won't.
Click to expand...

I’m not gonna go crazy and argue against that. 75 and 125 isn’t as huge a gap as 1 and 51. No doubt.

I never was arguing against that point.

50-100 over time is gonna be better than 100-150 though. What you’re trying to do is give the field to the 100+

You’ve been talking out your ass all day.
 
Last edited:
#6,665
#6,665
bleedingTNorange said:
50–100: Woolridge, Jurick, Hall, Golden, Mostella,

101-150: Richardson, Thompson, Turner, Johnson, Bone, Pons



Again I think the 2nd group produced better players and a higher hit %
Click to expand...

Dang you broke Zitis heart. He wasn't so quick to point out you weren't jumping in. Poor guy might have to sign off for the day for the second time today
 
#6,667
#6,667
BruinVol said:
Dang you broke Zitis heart. He wasn't so quick to point out you weren't jumping in. Poor guy might have to sign off for the day for the second time today
Click to expand...

He missed some jewels by you. That’s for sure. You’re clueless and this kinda **** is why the whole freaking VN hates your guts.
 
#6,673
#6,673
bleedingTNorange said:
Ok, use Nova, last 10 rivals classes...

50-100 and 101-150, maybe they’re the opposite of UT.
Click to expand...

I would be curious to know how many in each category they brought in.


And also I would like to know how many SEC recruits are outside the top 250. I am betting there are very very few outside the top 250 that play in the SEC.
 
New posts
Status
Not open for further replies.
Advertisement





Back
Top