Glitch
You called down the thunder well now you've got it
- Joined
- Feb 3, 2013
- Messages
- 45,400
- Likes
- 223,604
Jordan had Orlando woolridge averaging over 20pts and Dailey averaging 16pts. The rosters were not much different, very comparable. Boozer was still young only 2nd yr hadnt became the player he was with Utah
Nothing he said was false. The whole meaner tougher argument is just an opinion with no backing. They were like 6 new teams for most of Jordans career. That alone waters down the league as a whole.
Just stack up their individual abilities and you would take lebron in:
Passing
Transition
3pt shooting. (Jordans best two years they moved in the line)
Defensive versatility
Length
Rebounding.
Better in pick and roll
Getting to the rim
Jordan is for sure better mid range, free throws, on probably on ball defense.
So many things point to Lebron except for whatever the hell killer mentality is.
The funny thing with this debate is it always involves lebron fans giving excuses for failures and Jordan fans giving examples of greatness. :loco:
What is Jordans excuse for not being good enough to transition from high school straight to the nba? Jordan was not as good at 18 as LeBron and that was the ages being compared.
