Fbi raids trump lawyer

#503
#503
  • Like
Reactions: 9 people
#504
#504
lawgator1 said:
Why do you think that some person who is closely aligned with Trump has any credibility when he talks about this? You guys just do this over and over. Your Echo chamber is pathetic.
Click to expand...
The same reason that you think that a person who hates Trump has any credibility. I'm getting ready for President Pence.....a real conservative.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#505
#505
lawgator1 said:
Why do you think that some person who is closely aligned with Trump has any credibility when he talks about this? You guys just do this over and over. Your Echo chamber is pathetic.
Click to expand...

LOL....Oh please :eek:lol:, heaven forbid a valid argument, and typical response when it goes against you're vitriol and hate for Trump.
 
#506
#506
Pence, a worse potential President than Trump (because he is sane) will disappear from the political landscape the day after he emerges from a Men's room on an Indiana Interstate in handcuffs after having solicited solicited a State Trooper for sex. Momma will be pissed. When he hears the news Jared and Don, Jr may experience the wood
 
  • Like
Reactions: 6 people
#507
#507
PointGuard said:
Pence, a worse potential President than Trump (because he is sane) will disappear from the political landscape the day after he emerges from a Men's room on an Indiana Interstate in handcuffs after having solicited solicited a State Trooper for sex. Momma will be pissed. When he hears the news Jared and Don, Jr may experience the wood
Click to expand...
I hope you get what you wish for then.
 
#508
#508
I had to make a quick return to see what the gun toting pansy Racists were posting.

Hey you can't read and you can't do math. I never mention a wife, I'm 76 and YES I DID Call you pansies. LOL Just the gun toters. Not Luther, TennTom and the other SANE people here. LOL
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#509
#509
PointGuard said:
I had to make a quick return to see what the gun toting pansy Racists were posting.

Hey you can't read and you can't do math. I never mention a wife, I'm 76 and YES I DID Call you pansies. LOL Just the gun toters. Not Luther, TennTom and the other SANE people here. LOL
Click to expand...

Calling liberalism sane? Lay off the bath salts, pops!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#510
#510
Vol0725 said:
LOL....Oh please :eek:lol:, heaven forbid a valid argument, and typical response when it goes against you're vitriol and hate for Trump.
Click to expand...


Firing Mueller is not a valid argument. Even most Republicans on the hill say that. The only reason Trump would have to fire him is because he's closing in on Trump. We all know this. Quit pretending.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people
#511
#511
luthervol said:
I think he's horrible. He was a horrible pick for vice-pres. I probably agree more with Trump's policies than with Pence's.

BUT Pence isn't such a repugnant individual and national embarrassment. Plus, I believe Pence would cause much less long term damage.
Click to expand...

Pence has such a bland personality though. No charisma at all. He wouldn't be able to stir up the Republican base the way that Trump does. For all the negatives I have to say about Trump, he knows how to manipulate his core of support and he will go as low as he has to in attacking an opponent. Pence would stand no chance in 2020.

Having said that, Trump will still be President in 2020 and I do expect him to run... and he could even win if the Democrats don't get their act together and run a strong moderate.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#513
#513
BowlBrother85 said:
Pence has such a bland personality though. No charisma at all. He wouldn't be able to stir up the Republican base the way that Trump does. For all the negatives I have to say about Trump, he knows how to manipulate his core of support
Click to expand...

Do you think Trump also knows how to manipulate the opposition?
 
#515
#515
lawgator1 said:
Firing Mueller is not a valid argument. Even most Republicans on the hill say that. The only reason Trump would have to fire him is because he's closing in on Trump. We all know this. Quit pretending.
Click to expand...

Humor me here.

Non biased questions...if they have nothing, when does it end? when is enough enough? who decides?

IMO, the probe is about no crimes that were committed, you can't just investigate people, that's not how the law works...right?

Again, honestly, what are the crimes (collusion isn't a crime, and Article 2 protects the president in regards to obstruction)... it appears to me like the prize is Trump, and that's when the probe will stop in the Special Counsel's mind.
 
#517
#517
PointGuard said:
I had to make a quick return to see what the gun toting pansy Racists were posting.

Hey you can't read and you can't do math. I never mention a wife, I'm 76 and YES I DID Call you pansies. LOL Just the gun toters. Not Luther, TennTom and the other SANE people here. LOL
Click to expand...

4UiFU.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people
#518
#518
FLASHBACK...

Barack Obama’s 2008 presidential campaign was caught hiding the sources of 1,300 large campaign donations, aggregating to nearly $2 million. The campaign also accepted more than $1.3 million in unlawful donations from contributors who had already given the legal maximum.

Under federal law, such campaign-finance violations, if they aggregate to just $25,000 in a calendar year, may be treated as felonies punishable by up to five years’ imprisonment — with offenses involving smaller dollar amounts punishable by incarceration for a year or more. (See Section 30109(d) of Title 52, U.S. Code, pp. 51–52 of the Federal Election Commission’s compilation of campaign laws.)

The Obama campaign did not have a defense; it argued in mitigation that the unlawful donations constituted a negligible fraction of the monumental amount it had raised from millions of “grass-roots” donors. Compelling? Maybe not, but enough to convince the Obama Justice Department not to prosecute the Obama campaign — shocking, I know. During the Christmas holiday season right after the 2012 campaign, with Obama safely reelected and nobody paying much attention, the matter was quietly settled with the payment of a $375,000 fine.

Now...

Is the $130,000 in hush money Donald Trump’s personal lawyer paid to porn star Stormy Daniels on the eve of the 2016 election a campaign-finance violation? Probably, although it’s a point of contention. It may even be a simple civil penalty, who knows. Even if we stipulate that it is, though, we’re talking comparative chump change.

Hummm...what was not a crime in the Obama days is the crime of the century now? What am I missing?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people
#519
#519
McDad said:
He's definitely a cult of personality. He has great skill at controlling others through emotion.
Click to expand...

Very true. And perhaps due to his celebrity prior to running for President, he has a naturally lower bar for the expectation of decorum and professional etiquette. He can get away with behavior that not many politicians can. Running a campaign against him is like being in a boxing match with someone who is also allowed to kick you while you can just use the gloves.
 
#520
#520
PointGuard said:
Pence, a worse potential President than Trump (because he is sane) will disappear from the political landscape the day after he emerges from a Men's room on an Indiana Interstate in handcuffs after having solicited solicited a State Trooper for sex. Momma will be pissed. When he hears the news Jared and Don, Jr may experience the wood
Click to expand...

Phfffft. Not gonna happen. Secret Service of course has to sweep the bathroom first.

All aboard the Pence Train!!

Edit: hey it’s Mr Gustafson!! Get the refill on the little blue pills to keep the little woman satisfied? 😂😂😂
 
Last edited:
#521
#521
Cohen says FBI was 'courteous,' 'extremely professional'

http://thehill.com/homenews/news/382563-cohen-says-fbi-was-courteous-extremely-professional

"I am unhappy to have my personal residence and office raided," Cohen told CNN in an interview. "But I will tell you that members of the FBI that conducted the search and seizure were all extremely professional, courteous and respectful. And I thanked them at the conclusion."

Cohen also called the raid "upsetting," and acknowledged that he is worried about investigators' seizures of documents and communications.

"I would be lying to you if I told that I am not," he told CNN. "Do I need this in my life? No. Do I want to be involved in this? No."

He insisted in his interview with CNN on Tuesday that his payment to Daniels was legal, but also said that the raid has made him reconsider how he handled the payment.
 
#523
#523
Vol0725 said:
FLASHBACK...

Barack Obama’s 2008 presidential campaign was caught hiding the sources of 1,300 large campaign donations, aggregating to nearly $2 million. The campaign also accepted more than $1.3 million in unlawful donations from contributors who had already given the legal maximum.

Under federal law, such campaign-finance violations, if they aggregate to just $25,000 in a calendar year, may be treated as felonies punishable by up to five years’ imprisonment — with offenses involving smaller dollar amounts punishable by incarceration for a year or more. (See Section 30109(d) of Title 52, U.S. Code, pp. 51–52 of the Federal Election Commission’s compilation of campaign laws.)

The Obama campaign did not have a defense; it argued in mitigation that the unlawful donations constituted a negligible fraction of the monumental amount it had raised from millions of “grass-roots” donors. Compelling? Maybe not, but enough to convince the Obama Justice Department not to prosecute the Obama campaign — shocking, I know. During the Christmas holiday season right after the 2012 campaign, with Obama safely reelected and nobody paying much attention, the matter was quietly settled with the payment of a $375,000 fine.

Now...

Is the $130,000 in hush money Donald Trump’s personal lawyer paid to porn star Stormy Daniels on the eve of the 2016 election a campaign-finance violation? Probably, although it’s a point of contention. It may even be a simple civil penalty, who knows. Even if we stipulate that it is, though, we’re talking comparative chump change.

Hummm...what was not a crime in the Obama days is the crime of the century now? What am I missing?
Click to expand...

Did I miss something somewhere - how was the settlement linked or was it even linked to campaign finance?
 
#525
#525
Vol0725 said:
FLASHBACK...

Barack Obama’s 2008 presidential campaign was caught hiding the sources of 1,300 large campaign donations, aggregating to nearly $2 million. The campaign also accepted more than $1.3 million in unlawful donations from contributors who had already given the legal maximum.

Under federal law, such campaign-finance violations, if they aggregate to just $25,000 in a calendar year, may be treated as felonies punishable by up to five years’ imprisonment — with offenses involving smaller dollar amounts punishable by incarceration for a year or more. (See Section 30109(d) of Title 52, U.S. Code, pp. 51–52 of the Federal Election Commission’s compilation of campaign laws.)

The Obama campaign did not have a defense; it argued in mitigation that the unlawful donations constituted a negligible fraction of the monumental amount it had raised from millions of “grass-roots” donors. Compelling? Maybe not, but enough to convince the Obama Justice Department not to prosecute the Obama campaign — shocking, I know. During the Christmas holiday season right after the 2012 campaign, with Obama safely reelected and nobody paying much attention, the matter was quietly settled with the payment of a $375,000 fine.

Now...

Is the $130,000 in hush money Donald Trump’s personal lawyer paid to porn star Stormy Daniels on the eve of the 2016 election a campaign-finance violation? Probably, although it’s a point of contention. It may even be a simple civil penalty, who knows. Even if we stipulate that it is, though, we’re talking comparative chump change.

Hummm...what was not a crime in the Obama days is the crime of the century now? What am I missing?
Click to expand...
Two things. Obama had extensive armor, being black and being a Demoocrat.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top