#BoycottNRA

#3,453
#3,453
82_VOL_83 said:
Yeah but what if the shaker goes empty or he doesn't shake as fast as a non-salt user? What if he only uses 2 shakes instead of 30? What if......
Click to expand...

We need 17 waiters to see how many grains of salt can be delivered in y seconds. Now some can grind faster or slower than others, so we’ll need to average. We’ll need pro salt and anti salt grinders, professional waiters and regular citizens. Only then can we determine a reasonable and rational rate of salt dispensation.
 
#3,454
#3,454
Luther is heading to the beach where the humidity makes the grains get stuck together. The shaker in my house is hard to use. I guess I need to put rice in it.
 
#3,459
#3,459
tumscalcium said:
A Democrat wanting to take people rights away means the tide is shifting?

That’s par for the course.....
Click to expand...

You have no "rights" to an assault weapon. Not sure why you don't understand this. This very issue has already been decided upon by the Supreme Court. Please educate yourself on the subject.

"It was not the first time a federal appeals court had ruled that a ban on assault weapons was permissible under the Second Amendment. It was the fourth time in the past decade. In fact, no federal appeals court has ever held that assault weapons are protected.

The question of assault weapons was not addressed by the Supreme Court when, in 2008, it held for the first time in District of Columbia v. Heller that the Second Amendment protects an individual right to possess a firearm. Justice Antonin Scalia, writing for the court, went out of his way to say that the right “is not unlimited.”

Does the Second Amendment really protect assault weapons? Four courts have said no. - The Washington Post
 
#3,460
#3,460
OuterBanksVol said:
You have no "rights" to an assault weapon. Not sure why you don't understand this. This very issue has already been decided upon by the Supreme Court. Please educate yourself on the subject.

"It was not the first time a federal appeals court had ruled that a ban on assault weapons was permissible under the Second Amendment. It was the fourth time in the past decade. In fact, no federal appeals court has ever held that assault weapons are protected.

The question of assault weapons was not addressed by the Supreme Court when, in 2008, it held for the first time in District of Columbia v. Heller that the Second Amendment protects an individual right to possess a firearm. Justice Antonin Scalia, writing for the court, went out of his way to say that the right “is not unlimited.”

Does the Second Amendment really protect assault weapons? Four courts have said no. - The Washington Post
Click to expand...

What’s an assault weapon?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#3,461
#3,461
I would counter your ignorant argument and cite specifics from the Heller case that prove you wrong, but you'll just ignore it as usual.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#3,463
#3,463
Grand Vol said:
I would counter your ignorant argument and cite specifics from the Heller case that prove you wrong, but you'll just ignore it as usual.
Click to expand...

Even the article he quoted contradicts the facts. The state of Maryland argued that “assault weapons” were used in a majority of mass shootings. Their percentage stated? 21%. Wow that’s obviously a majority 🙄 And one of many contradictions in the article.

No wonder Trump is going after Bezos and WaPo with made up **** like that flying around.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#3,464
#3,464
NorthDallas40 said:
Even the article he quoted contradicts the facts. The state of Maryland argued that “assault weapons” were used in a majority of mass shootings. Their percentage stated? 21%. Wow that’s obviously a majority 🙄 And one of many contradictions in the article.

No wonder Trump is going after Bezos and WaPo with made up **** like that flying around.
Click to expand...

Here's the actual text:

"...And although the gun groups had argued that assault weapons such as AR-15s were the most popular sporting rifles in the United States, the Maryland government argued that they also happened to be the most popular guns used in mass shootings."

Majority > Popular.

Reading Comprehension 101, dude. Check into it.
 
#3,466
#3,466
OuterBanksVol said:
Here's the actual text:

"...And although the gun groups had argued that assault weapons such as AR-15s were the most popular sporting rifles in the United States, the Maryland government argued that they also happened to be the most popular guns used in mass shootings."

Majority > Popular.

Reading Comprehension 101, dude. Check into it.
Click to expand...

Maryland was wrong.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#3,469
#3,469
outerbanksvol said:
here's the actual text:

"...and although the gun groups had argued that assault weapons such as ar-15s were the most popular sporting rifles in the united states, the maryland government argued that they also happened to be the most popular guns used in mass shootings."

majority > popular.

Reading comprehension 101, dude. Check into it.
Click to expand...

😂😂😂😂😂
 
#3,471
#3,471
As time passes on during this debate, it's becoming more evident that this really isn't about kids being shot at school or people being shot at a theater or concert but rather a law being passed that says "we won" something.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement





Back
Top