#BoycottNRA

#3,301
#3,301
I loved hearing some moron argue the 2nd ammendment had nothing to do with personal gun ownership rights, it had to do with a forming constitutional army.

Seriously these idiots don’t know what they want. They just want it really really bad!
 
#3,302
#3,302
NorthDallas40 said:
I loved hearing some moron argue the 2nd ammendment had nothing to do with personal gun ownership rights, it had to do with a forming constitutional army.

Seriously these idiots don’t know what they want. They just want it really really bad!
Click to expand...

They like to trip over their points and circle back around as if everyone would forget what they said previously.
 
#3,303
#3,303
NorthDallas40 said:
I loved hearing some moron argue the 2nd ammendment had nothing to do with personal gun ownership rights, it had to do with a forming constitutional army.

Seriously these idiots don’t know what they want. They just want it really really bad!
Click to expand...

It's even funnier to listen to the ones who try to explain that the 2A is about the government being the militia and that we don't need it anymore.
 
#3,304
#3,304
I think it hilarious that people dont know it’s both. The people were supposed to keep, maintain, and practice with their arms for self-defense and in the event of a call up, to defend the national. Once upon a long time ago, the militia would supply its own arms. The militia in the 2A is not the National Guard, Army, or State Guard. It’s the citizenry.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#3,307
#3,307
82_VOL_83 said:
Dude, you need to figure out how to draw that triangle before you get into anymore math. Your theories just don't cut it.....too many "and then a miracle occurs" steps for me.
Click to expand...

I give you enough credit to know that my triangle method was the best and easiest. Even Trut and Squirts conceded by their silence. If you can't admit I'm right even when you obviously know that I'm right, then every other time you say I'm wrong will be suspect.
 
#3,308
#3,308
I think the woman around the 8:30 mark is having a stroke. At one point she just says "Gun laws."

The guys that do this non-confrontational thing are so much better at letting the stupid come to light. The guy at the beginning sums it up: I looked at this at 3am the morning of the march.
 
#3,312
#3,312
luthervol said:
No to both. But if one is more true than the other (which I'm not conceding) then it's the former.
Click to expand...

The "no" is predicated on the idea that you cant, not because you wouldnt if you could.

No reason to hide behind that anymore.

Essentially a compromise would suffice until you figure out it's not going to change anything. Then the next gun grab attempt goes into action.
 
Last edited:
#3,313
#3,313
#3,315
#3,315
BeecherVol said:
The "no" is predicated on the idea that you cant, not because you wouldnt if you could.

No reason to hide behind that anymore.

Essentially a compromise would suffice until you figure out it's not going to change anything. Then the next gun grab attempt goes into action.
Click to expand...

Yep. Before too long it will be handguns and hunting rifles. Except then they'll be labeled "sniper rifles". Not sure what they'll try to tag handguns as. Concealable wmd or something silly like that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#3,317
#3,317
“The rifle itself has no moral stature since it has no will of its own. Naturally, it may be used by evil men for evil purposes, but there are more good men than evil, and while the latter cannot be persuaded to the path of righteousness by propaganda, they can certainly be corrected by good men with rifles.”

― Jeff Cooper, Art of the Rifle
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#3,318
#3,318
DEFENDTHISHOUSE said:
“The rifle itself has no moral stature since it has no will of its own. Naturally, it may be used by evil men for evil purposes, but there are more good men than evil, and while the latter cannot be persuaded to the path of righteousness by propaganda, they can certainly be corrected by good men with rifles.”

― Jeff Cooper, Art of the Rifle
Click to expand...

The second amendment is dope, yo.

-Thomas Jefferson.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#3,319
#3,319
BeecherVol said:
The "no" is predicated on the idea that you cant, not because you wouldnt if you could.

No reason to hide behind that anymore.

Essentially a compromise would suffice until you figure out it's not going to change anything. Then the next gun grab attempt goes into action.
Click to expand...

You're wrong. I wouldn't. Flat out absolutely 100% wouldn't. But you keep on deluding yourself in order to justify your unwillingness to be rational and reasonable.
 
#3,321
#3,321
luthervol said:
You're wrong. I wouldn't. Flat out absolutely 100% wouldn't. But you keep on deluding yourself in order to justify your unwillingness to be rational and reasonable.
Click to expand...

Bull**** Luther. You spend your time going after a particular firearm that is used in a minuscule amount of murders and you expect us to believe you won’t go after another?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5 people
#3,322
#3,322
luthervol said:
I give you enough credit to know that my triangle method was the best and easiest. Even Trut and Squirts conceded by their silence. If you can't admit I'm right even when you obviously know that I'm right, then every other time you say I'm wrong will be suspect.
Click to expand...

Pretty sure Squints ignored it because it wasn't part of the serious discussion and TRUT left you in room. Believe me, I would admit you were right if your were and I'm not saying that your method wouldn't work given certain conditions. However, you assumed and given the reason for the test, assumptions wouldn't be allowed.
 
#3,323
#3,323
82_VOL_83 said:
Pretty sure Squints ignored it because it wasn't part of the serious discussion and TRUT left you in room. Believe me, I would admit you were right if your were and I'm not saying that your method wouldn't work given certain conditions. However, you assumed and given the reason for the test, assumptions wouldn't be allowed.
Click to expand...

I'll spare everyone a rehashing. It works under every condition and I made no assumptions.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement





Back
Top