TrumpPutingate III: the beginning of the end

#5,351
#5,351
Vol0725 said:
The media everyday, racing against the clock to create more anti-Trump clickbait


clickgif.gif
Click to expand...

And you make your job to try to debunk it. Not working out so well for you. When you say "No collusion" citing your sources of idiocy and forgeting about the Trump Tower meeting where they swapped recipes, I have to remind you that you have not gotten over that hump yet.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#5,352
#5,352
Mick said:
And you make your job to try to debunk it. Not working out so well for you. When you say "No collusion" citing your sources of idiocy and forgeting about the Trump Tower meeting where they swapped recipes, I have to remind you that you have not gotten over that hump yet.
Click to expand...

My idiocy? LOL...now they are swapping recipes. Jebuzz, the plot thickens.

giphy-downsized.gif
 
Last edited:
#5,354
#5,354
George Nader, the mysterious Lebanese-American businessman who attended Trump campaign meetings with foreign officials during the presidential transition—and who is now cooperating with the Mueller probe—took millions of dollars from the United Arab Emirates before he began handing out large political donations to U.S. lawmakers considering legislation targeting Qatar, the UAE’s main rival. The Associated Press reported that Nader wired $2.5 million to Trump fundraiser Elliott Broidy in what unnamed sources said was part of an effort to persuade the U.S. to take a hard line against Qatar.

Mueller Witness Took UAE Cash, Bankrolled Anti-Qatar Laws - The Daily Beast
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#5,356
#5,356
Mick said:
And you make your job to try to debunk it. Not working out so well for you. When you say "No collusion" citing your sources of idiocy and forgeting about the Trump Tower meeting where they swapped recipes, I have to remind you that you have not gotten over that hump yet.
Click to expand...

Debunk what? That article is pure speculation with nothing concrete backing up it's assumptions.
 
#5,360
#5,360
Mick said:
He said "no collusion" and posted a link. So he used a crap article to say "no collusion". Take it up with him.
Click to expand...

Here's the 'crap article'...and "no collusion" was a joke, in reference to why would Trump do this if he was in cahoots with the Kremlin...don't be a moron.

Access Denied
 
#5,361
#5,361
Vol0725 said:
Here's the 'crap article'...and "no collusion" was a joke, in reference to why would Trump do this if he was in cahoots with the Kremlin...don't be a moron.

Access Denied
Click to expand...

He expels 60 diplomats because of what Russia has done to our Allies? Nothing more. I have often thought that Russia could be one of our allies but not like this. Like this is becoming a B**ch for Russia. Don't be a Russian B**ch.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#5,362
#5,362
Mick said:
He expels 60 diplomats because of what Russia has done to our Allies? Nothing more. I have often thought that Russia could be one of our allies but not like this. Like this is becoming a B**ch for Russia. Don't be a Russian B**ch.
Click to expand...

lol u'll never quit...russia russia trump tower
 
#5,366
#5,366
B**tch please

Jr took the meeting thinking they had dirt on Hilary.
There was none. They talked about Russian adoption, and the Maninsky Act.

Those contacts, however, fall far short of any evidence of collusion and can actually be used to counter such allegations.

Moreover, the Russians used a British music promoter familiar with Donald Trump Jr. to secure a meeting with the promise of evidence of unlawful contributions made to the Clinton Foundation. There was no effort to limit the participants or hide the meeting. This secret operation supposedly was advanced with a meeting at Trump Tower with an army of reporters outside and no prior knowledge of who would be present. The brief meeting primarily discussed the lifting of a federal ban on Russian adoptions. If anything, the meeting would indicate that, in June 2016, the Russians were still trying to make contact with the Trump campaign.

Does it really track that Russian intelligence was running a disinformation and hacking campaign but sought to collude with Donald Trump Jr.? If so, the meeting was curiously late and public for that purpose. Moreover, critics continue to refuse to recognize the different treatment given these contacts with Russians and the contacts of former British spy Michael Steele, who authored the controversial Trump dossier.

Seriously, other than it being possibly a dumb decision, what's your point?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#5,367
#5,367
Vol0725 said:
B**tch please

Jr took the meeting thinking they had dirt on Hilary.
There was none. They talked about Russian adoption, and the Maninsky Act.

Those contacts, however, fall far short of any evidence of collusion and can actually be used to counter such allegations.
Click to expand...
You need a hand written note from Trump to Putin don't you? Where it spells it out for you?

Moreover, the Russians used a British music promoter familiar with Donald Trump Jr. to secure a meeting with the promise of evidence of unlawful contributions made to the Clinton Foundation. There was no effort to limit the participants or hide the meeting. This secret operation supposedly was advanced with a meeting at Trump Tower with an army of reporters outside and no prior knowledge of who would be present. The brief meeting primarily discussed the lifting of a federal ban on Russian adoptions. If anything, the meeting would indicate that, in June 2016, the Russians were still trying to make contact with the Trump campaign.
Click to expand...

Hillary was not clean and there was dirt left to be raveled. You are obviously omitting Russia's links to Wiki Leaks. And the meeting could have been in violation of the the Logan act.

Hillary was not clean and there was dirt left to be raveled. You are obviously omitting Russia's links to Wiki Leaks. And the meeting could have been in violation of the the Logan act.Does it really track that Russian intelligence was running a disinformation and hacking campaign but sought to collude with Donald Trump Jr.? If so, the meeting was curiously late and public for that purpose. Moreover, critics continue to refuse to recognize the different treatment given these contacts with Russians and the contacts of former British spy Michael Steele, who authored the controversial Trump dossier.

Seriously, other than it being possibly a dumb decision, what's your point?
Click to expand...

Most criminals are dumb.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#5,368
#5,368
Mick said:
Hillary was not clean and there was dirt left to be raveled. You are obviously omitting Russia's links to Wiki Leaks. And the meeting could have been in violation of the the Logan act.



Most criminals are dumb.
Click to expand...

Russia alleged 'links' to WikLeaks, I'm sure there were. No clue...explain to me what that has to do with the Trump campaign, other than an hypothetical conspiracy that zero, as in nada evidence has been proven that an criminal conspiracy occured. Not a pubic hair! It's a phony farce made up story man...I mean the ONLY known FACT is, there were FALSE ALLEGATIONS that then-candidate Donald Trump and his top aides received advance access in 2016 to hacked WikiLeaks documents – which had in actually already been made public.

However, the Senate Intel panel confirmed several contacts between Trump campaign aides and Russians, as well as communications between people in Trump world and Wikileaks, through which Russian intelligence fenced stolen political communications...it was concluded those contacts were "ill-advised," but not illegal or improper.

Alas, the good ole Logan Act, the infamous and obscure law looming over the Trump-Russia probe that has been favored by partisan hacks since 1799...and NEVER , not once convicted someone. Good ole Sally Yates, brought that upon Flynn, which led to ruining him...'for nothing'!

If Mueller makes this obscure law the centerpiece of his case against the Trump administration, he runs the risk of inviting accusations, however unfounded, that he, too, is a partisan hack.

The Logan Act...If you wanna play that hand, then you HAVE TO look no further than HRC/DNC/Perkins Coie/Fusion GPS/The Clintonites etc etc etc...
 
Last edited:
#5,371
#5,371
Life will be better for the Libs and Dems if they let it go, and just focus on ‘trying’ to take back the WH in 2024.
 
#5,372
#5,372
Mick said:
Didn't take much to prove you're a B**ch. I would like for you explain away that meeting. What did they talk about for starters. I'm not asking if it was legal or not.
Click to expand...

Was this the meeting with the Russian attorney who is connected to Fusion GPS?
 
#5,375
#5,375
EXCLUSIVE – After he escaped from Al Qaeda in Syria, American photojournalist Matt Schrier investigated his own kidnapping and uncovered what he describes as a pattern of "betrayal" by FBI agents handling his case.

Schrier is now asking hard questions of former FBI Director Robert Mueller, who now leads the special counsel Russia probe, and former FBI Director James Comey who was fired by President Trump in May 2017.

"Not every FBI agent is bad. Some are very good people," Schrier told Fox News. "But the ones that are bad need to be weeded out. And the ones who let them be bad, and who turn their head, need to be exposed."

In an exclusive cable interview that first aired Monday on "The Story" with Martha MacCallum, Schrier went in depth, sharing emails, financial records and formal letters of complaint, which backed up allegations that after he was taken hostage in 2012, the FBI monitored his accounts as Al Qaeda terrorists used his money to buy at least a dozen computers and tablets.

While he was tortured and held by al Nusra, the brutal Al Qaeda franchise in Syria, Schrier claimed the FBI put intelligence gathering ahead of his personal security, hoping to track the computers and tablets to learn more about Al Qaeda recruits and future plots. After his harrowing escape, Schrier started demanding answers from the FBI, which at the time of his kidnapping was led by Mueller.

American who escaped Al Qaeda captivity says FBI, under Mueller and Comey, betrayed him | Fox News
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top