butchna
Sit down and tell me all about it...way over there
- Joined
- Jan 6, 2013
- Messages
- 107,006
- Likes
- 225,098
I've looked through almost all of the leaked information (a lot of time on my hands, what can I say), and I have yet to see anybody in a position of authority say anything about hiring Jon Gruden. At least there was one thing they did right......
Sorry if everybody already knows this, but I'm in the John Currie texts (1st phone) document, and there is lots of information that seems to be redacted (blank white blocks among the rest of the text). If you highlight it, copy it, and paste it into Word, you can see all the text.
His private phone would still be required in FOIA right? Anything related to the job (like his personal email that he wrongly believed wouldn't be released) or any device where he conducts business.
Yes, it appears that some state courts have broadened requests to include personal phones. But I still think there is an argument to not release it when the person pays for that phone with their own money. As utvols88 said, UT also can't release it if they don't have access to the records.
Phone company keeps a log right? Every state employee would just conduct all business in personal devices (ahem, Hillary) if it were that easy to dodge FOIA laws. Burner phone would get around that though.
