apevol
KDKWKDJDKAJFBAJFJW D JAKFJSJSHF
- Joined
- Dec 23, 2012
- Messages
- 26,949
- Likes
- 22,321
So take a look at the next post I made after that. If consciousness is a requirement then the loss of consciousness loses person status? And if your no longer a person you have no rights or protections under the law?
Under the law? Depends on the legal statutes.
Further, did I say consciousness? I thought I said capacity for abstract rational thought and sentiment. That, I think, is the essence of personhood and what makes persons special.
Under the law? Depends on the legal statutes.
Further, did I say consciousness? I thought I said capacity for abstract rational thought and sentiment. That, I think, is the essence of personhood and what makes persons special.
Ok fair enough I was equating that to consciousness. I didnt mean awake I meant reasoning.
Thus if we agree on that basis then you think a person can lose person status?
Listen I have no agenda Im not trying to trap you. This just popped into my head reading this and Im seeing where it goes. Ive never really considered an individual could lose person or human status.
Yes, I think it is possible for someone to lose personhood. In fact, I think most who suffer from advanced forms of alzheimers and dementia have lost their personhood.
That one hits close to home for me. My father died as a result of Alzheimers. My mother was on her way before a blood vessel in her brain saved her the indignity.
But they were still people, persons. Their reasoning and memories were just totally rewired.
So in the way you answered that have you thought about the concept of losing personhood before or is this a new pondering. Ive honestly never thought of it before.
Now to make my brain really hurt, I am thinking you stated your athiest? Its not an accusation.
But if so then the human identity doesnt exist beyond the biological form right? If so, and the concept of reasoning is taken as defining a person, then one could argue that when the brain has developed to the point that logical thoughts are capable of being stored within the synaptic pathways you have reached personhood? Or you think its the imprinting, the forming of those thoughts that defines personhood? Because the former is a biological basis. The latter is just for lack of a better example muscle memory.
Might go to basis of picking a defining point for person from the atheistic viewpoint.
Full disclosure. I am not atheistic I am Christian. But Im seriously not bringing that into this I have nothing Im springing here.
