TrumpPutingate III: the beginning of the end

Pretty sad that you hope and pray our President and/or his people committed a crime.

The crimes he committed was before he became president. Its sad he wasn't caught before. He is not a good business man evident by his numerous bankruptcies and the numerous Americans those bankruptcies hurt. Kushner is also from a crime family. I have no love loss for them so you shouldn't shed a tear when the truth comes out.
 
The crimes he committed was before he became president. Its sad he wasn't caught before. He is not a good business man evident by his numerous bankruptcies and the numerous Americans those bankruptcies hurt. Kushner is also from a crime family. I have no love loss for them so you shouldn't shed a tear when the truth comes out.
So, Trump is an ex-con? Maybe he has reformed.
 
The crimes he committed was before he became president. Its sad he wasn't caught before. He is not a good business man evident by his numerous bankruptcies and the numerous Americans those bankruptcies hurt. Kushner is also from a crime family. I have no love loss for them so you shouldn't shed a tear when the truth comes out.

Trump has never filed for bankruptcy, something like 4-6 of his properties have. None have ever filed chapter 7 bankruptcy. You might want to learn yourself up on the subject. Do you consider Bezos is a good businessman?

There is no proof and there has been no accusations that he committed any crime prior to running for President.
 
The crimes he committed was before he became president. Its sad he wasn't caught before. He is not a good business man evident by his numerous bankruptcies and the numerous Americans those bankruptcies hurt. Kushner is also from a crime family. I have no love loss for them so you shouldn't shed a tear when the truth comes out.

Lol. Man you're desperate.
 
Since I don't believe the meeting was about adoptions, I will continue to be optimistic that it was about the release of "dirt on Hillary" and "sanctions".

But if that don't pan out I still have the witch hunt.

Shouldn’t you want to keep this orange Bernie Sanders in office?
 
Trump has never filed for bankruptcy, something like 4-6 of his properties have. None have ever filed chapter 7 bankruptcy. You might want to learn yourself up on the subject. Do you consider Bezos is a good businessman?

There is no proof and there has been no accusations that he committed any crime prior to running for President.

And this is where you typically derail a normal conversation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
they are called "facts" and yes they would derail a fantasy thread.

Can't take anyone serious that never capitalizes the beginning of a sentence. Trump U grad I see. Did you ever get your money back from another failure of Trump.
 
Can't take anyone serious that never capitalizes the beginning of a sentence. Trump U grad I see. Did you ever get your money back from another failure of Trump.

this is what deflection looks like. and to answer your question.

yUP. tOOK IT AND INVESTED IT. wILL RETIRE AT 30. oNLY REASON I WORK NOW IS BOREDOM.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Can't take anyone serious that never capitalizes the beginning of a sentence. Trump U grad I see. Did you ever get your money back from another failure of Trump.

Ah yes. The grammar Nazi. The last defense of the defeated party in the debate. Lol.

Edit: but props on the non sequitor shift to Trump
U followed by the ad hominem! 👍
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Ah yes. The grammar Nazi. The last defense of the defeated party in the debate. Lol.

Edit: but props on the non sequitor shift to Trump
U followed by the ad hominem! 👍

The conversation ended when Hog and I were talking about bankruptcies and Trump being a bad businessman. Keep up and you wont get left behind. Way to jump on a false narrative by your fellow Trump anal probes.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
The conversation ended when Hog and I were talking about bankruptcies and Trump being a bad businessman. Keep up and you wont get left behind. Way to jump on a false narrative by your fellow Trump anal probes.

Lol. You’re so fos by even typing that out and trying to sell it.
 
Hell all you have to do is go back and read. I even pointed out where it got derailed. You have a tendency to jump in with both feet.

I saw it. It still reads pretty straight forward to me. Plus didn’t you bring up the bankruptcy stuff?
 
Ah yes. The grammar Nazi. The last defense of the defeated party in the debate. Lol.

Edit: but props on the non sequitor shift to Trump
U followed by the ad hominem! 👍

And about this you were not in the conversation or debate. Just pop on in and spew your s**t like the rest.
 
And about this you were not in the conversation or debate. Just pop on in and spew your s**t.

Lol. Ok my bad. And thanks for the laugh I’ll giggle on the drive home now.

Edit: forgot to add... Triggered!!. Been wanting to use that all day.
 
FBI Continues to Skirt Court Order to Turn Over McCabe Communications | Sara A. Carter

For more than two months, the FBI has failed to abide by a judge’s order to turn over all of former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe’s text messages, emails and SMS phone messages to a government watchdog group that has filed a lawsuit on behalf of a former senior FBI special agent. The communications in question are related to McCabe’s wife’s unsuccessful run for Virginia State senate and might also contain invaluable information on McCabe’s role in the Bureau’s investigation into Hillary Clinton’s private email server used to send classified information, several former FBI sources and a government official told this reporter.

According to loother ..... this means they're guilty as hell
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Not sure anybody's been talking about this here, but this Russian libertarian guy posted this, and I thought it was interesting.

In Russian, there are two words - ‘rooski’ and ‘rossiyanin’. ‘Rooski’ refers to ethnic Russians, while ‘rossiyanin’ refers to all citizens of Russia regardless of their ethnicity. Unfortunately, English does not distinguish between the two (like it does with ‘Afghan’ and ‘Afghani’), translating both as ‘Russian’.

Why does it matter? Because of stuff like this:

“But his remark about Jews, which seemed to suggest that a Russian Jew was not really a Russian, prompted particular outrage among those who remember Russia’s centuries-long history of anti-Semitism and Jewish purges. Some groups compared the statement to anti-Jewish myths that helped inspire the Holocaust.”

Putin used ‘rooski’ not ‘rossiyanin’ when he responded that some of the people who were indicted were not (ethnic) Russians. A Russian Jew can be a rossiyanin, but not a rooski.

The MSM doesn’t seem to care about linguistic nuances, choosing instead to paint Putin as an anti-Semite.

It used the same tactic against Ahmadinejad, translating “down with the Zionist regime” as “death to Israel”.

It pays to be aware of these types of language manipulations.

Russian President Vladimir Putin condemned for saying Jews may have manipulated U.S. election - The Washington Post
 
Not sure anybody's been talking about this here, but this Russian libertarian guy posted this, and I thought it was interesting.



Russian President Vladimir Putin condemned for saying Jews may have manipulated U.S. election - The Washington Post

This is all headline fluff to get clicks and viewership.
But, I’m not saying we should totally stand ideal, without addressing the matter.

I still don’t buy into all this ‘who effected’ the election. Meddling? Hell, there’s always been and always will be meddling of some kind, even domesticity to peddle discord or whatever. You’ll never ever contain social media peddling, nor whom all could be doing it or masking it.

Most people listen to the candidates on the issues that concern and effect them. And they talk amongst their local constituents and family. Personally, this is all wayyy blown outta proportion IMO, which don’t mean much.
Most people I know and speak too, are intelligent enough to not rely on the internet, social media, nor the mainstream media.
 
Last edited:
Trump is reportedly seriously considering firing Sessions again and replacing him with Pruitt from the EPA. If true he obviously would not be forced to recuse himself from the Russian investigation. As such, there's speculation Pruitt would fire Mueller.

Hope this is all BS. Rest assured if this were to pass there would be a constitutional crisis and a complete meltdown from both democrats and independents.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Advertisement

Back
Top